ABSTRACT
Objective assessment of fluid status in critical surgical care may help optimize perioperative fluid administration and prevent postoperative fluid retention. We evaluated the feasibility of hydration status and fluid distribution assessment by Bioimpedance spectroscopy Analysis (BIA) in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery. This observational study included 73 patients undergoing AHA surgery. During the observational period (0-120 h), we registered BIA calculated absolute fluid overload (AFO) and relative fluid overload (RFO), defined as AFO/extracellular water ratio, as well as cumulative fluid balance and weight. Based on RFO values, hydration status was classified into three categories: dehydrated (RFO < - 10%), normohydrated (- 10% ≤ RFO ≤ + 15%), overhydrated RFO > 15%. We performed a total of 365 BIA measurements. Preoperative overhydration was found in 16% of patients, increasing to 66% by postoperative day five. The changes in BIA measured AFO correlated with the cumulative fluid balance (r2 = 0.44, p < .001), and change in weight (r2 = 0.55, p < .0001). Perioperative overhydration measured with BIA was associated with worse outcome compared to patients with normo- or dehydration. We have demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining perioperative bedside BIA measurements in patients undergoing AHA surgery. BIA measurements correlated with fluid balance, weight changes, and postoperative clinical complications. BIA-assessed fluid status might add helpful information to guide fluid management in patients undergoing AHA surgery.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Water Intoxication , Water-Electrolyte Imbalance , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Prospective Studies , Body Water , Water , Electric ImpedanceABSTRACT
Stable intraoperative haemodynamics are associated with improved outcome and even short periods of instability are associated with an increased risk of complications. During anaesthesia intermittent non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate remains the cornerstone of haemodynamic monitoring. Continuous monitoring of systemic blood pressure or even -flow requires invasive or advanced modalities creating a barrier for obtaining important real-time haemodynamic insight. The Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) is obtained continuously and non-invasively by standard photoplethysmography. We hypothesized that changes in indices of systemic blood flow during general anaesthesia would be reflected in the PPI. PPI, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were evaluated in 20 patients. During general anaesthesia but before start of surgery relative changes of SV, CO and MAP were compared to the relative changes of PPI induced by head-up (HUT) and head-down tilt (HDT). Furthermore, the effect of phenylephrine (PE) during HUT on these parameters was investigated. ∆PPI correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with ∆SV (r = 0.9), ∆CO (r = 0.9), and ∆MAP (r = 0.9). HUT following induction of anaesthesia resulted in a decrease in PPI of 41% (25-52) [median (IQR)], SV 27% (23-31), CO 27% (25-35), and MAP 28% (22-35). HDT led to an increase in PPI of 203% (120-375), SV of 29% (21-41), CO 22% (16-34), and MAP 47% (42-60). After stabilizing a second HUT decreased PPI 59% (49-76), SV 33% (28-37), CO 31% (28-36), and MAP 34% (26-38). Restoration of preload with PE increased PPI by 607% (218-1078), SV by 96% (82-116), CO by 65% (56-99), and MAP by 114% (83-147). During general anaesthesia changes in PPI tracked changes in systemic haemodynamics.
Subject(s)
Hemodynamics , Perfusion Index , Anesthesia, General , Blood Pressure , Cardiac Output , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In a frail patient group often suffering from dehydration, hip fracture is potentially fatal partly because of the blood loss and thus deteriorated circulation. An important goal for haemodynamic monitoring and resuscitation is early detection of insufficient tissue perfusion. "The peripheral perfusion index" reflects changes in peripheral perfusion and blood volume. We hypothesize that hip fracture patients are hypovolaemic with poor peripheral perfusion and accordingly respond to controlled fluid resuscitation. The peripheral perfusion index might reflect restricted tissue perfusion in spite of stable central haemodynamic variables. METHODS: This prospective observational study assess to what extend hip fracture patients suffer from hypovolaemia and respond to a stroke volume-guided fluid challenge. The secondary objectives are to evaluate correlation between the non-invasive peripheral perfusion index and minimally invasive measures of stroke volume, changes in blood volume and near-infrared spectroscopy determined tissue- and cerebral oxygenation and to compare results to prevalence of post-operative complications including mortality. We will include 50 patients (>65 years) presenting a hip fracture and treated in a multimodal fast-track regimen when written informed consent is available. DISCUSSION: This is likely the first study to address pre-operative haemodynamic monitoring and resuscitation in hip fracture patients where adequate resuscitation is easily missed. We aim to evaluate feasibility of pre-operative stroke volume-guided haemodynamic optimization in the context of minimally- and non-invasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion and measure of blood volume.