Association between the colorectal cancer screening status of primary care physicians and their patients: Evidence from the Swiss Sentinella practice-based research network.

Swiss health insurance reimburses screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with either colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Studies have documented the association between a physician's personal preventive health practices and the practices they recommend to their patients. We explored the association between CRC testing status of primary care physicians (PCP) and the testing rate among their patients. From May 2017 to September 2017, we invited 129 PCP who belonged to the Swiss Sentinella Network to disclose their CRC test status and whether they had been tested with colonoscopy or FOBT/other methods. Each participating PCP collected demographic data and CRC testing status from 40 consecutive 50- to 75-year-old patients. We analyzed data from 69 (54%) PCP 50 years or older and 2623 patients. Most PCP were men (81%); 75% were tested for CRC (67% with colonoscopy and 9% with FOBT). Mean patient age was 63; 50% were women; 43% had been tested for CRC (38%, 1000/2623 with colonoscopy and 5%, 131/2623, with FOBT or other non-endoscopic test). In multivariate adjusted regression models that clustered patients by PCP, the proportion of patients tested for CRC was higher among PCP tested for CRC than among PCP not tested (47% vs 32%; OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.85). Since PCP CRC testing status is associated with their patients CRC testing rates, it informs future interventions that will alert PCPs to the influence of their health decisions and motivate them to further incorporate the values and preferences of their patients in their practice.

Young Survivors at KSA: registry for standardised assessment of long-term and late-onset health events in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer-a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: A high proportion of survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer experience chronic medical conditions - late effects. Most studies on late effects have a retrospective or questionnaire-based design, which leads to unavoidable limitations such as missing data or different severity coding and grading of late effects. We, therefore, need prospective data, including standardised severity coding and grading. 'Young Survivors at KSA' aims to close this gap by assessing frequency, severity, risk factors and longitudinal changes of late effects in childhood cancer survivors prospectively and in a standardised way. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Within the 'Young Survivors at KSA' registry, we collect data from regular follow-up visits in a comprehensive database prospectively and repeatedly from start of the study and retrospectively at most until January 2016. We classify and grade the severity of late effects according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 modified by Hudson et al. The outcome variables correspond to results from risk-stratified organ examinations, performed according to the Children's Oncology Group guidelines version 5.0 and the recommendations by the International Guideline Harmonization Group. We collect the exposure variables from the patients' medical history, including detailed information on cancer diagnosis and treatment. We analyse the data in an exposure-driven and organ system-driven approach. We start recruitment with patients treated at the Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland. However, our design allows the inclusion of additional national centres later. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: 'Young Survivors at KSA' is approved by the Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, reference number AO_2020-00012. The results of this study will be presented at scientific meetings, including meetings with childhood cancer survivors and published in peer-reviewed and if possible open access journals. New insights gained from the study will be used directly in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04811794; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04811794.

Patient preferences for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: how much benefit is worthwhile from the patient's perspective?

Oncological studies have shown that patients consider small benefits sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy worthwhile. We sought to determine the minimal survival benefits that patients considered enough to legitimate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and the factors associated with patient preferences. One hundred eighty-four patients having previously received allogeneic HCT at our centre were included and completed a questionnaire exploring patient expectations elicited by time trade-off scenarios as well as quality of life (QoL), symptoms of graft-versus host disease (GvHD) and sociodemographic characteristics. The majority of patients considered a minimal survival benefit of at least 5 (38.6%) or 10 years (41.9%) sufficient to justify HCT, with less than 5% considering survival < 1 year sufficient to warrant HCT. In terms of minimal cure rate, a cumulative 14.8% of patients accepted cure rates below 30% and 30.6% rates below 50%. Likelihood-ratio tests were significant for the effect of age at transplant on expected minimal survival (p = 0.007) and cure rates (p = 0.0001); that is, younger patients at HCT were more likely to accept smaller survival and cure rates. Pre-transplant risk score, QoL, GvHD score and sociological factors did not seem to influence patients' expectations. In conclusion, patient expectations of treatment were much higher than what had been reported in oncological studies. Patients who experienced HCT considered a survival superior to 1 year and cure rates above 50% sufficient to make it worthwhile. Younger patients were more likely to accept smaller benefits; no other predictors for preferences could be detected.

The self-image in borderline personality disorder: an in-depth qualitative research study.

Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) suffer from affective instability, impulsivity, and identity disturbance which particularly manifest in an unstable or insecure self-image. One main problem for studies of core psychopathology in BPD is the complex subject of identity disturbance and self-image. The purpose of this study was to investigate the self-image of BPD patients with a qualitative research approach. Twelve patients with BPD were compared to 12 patients with remitted major depressive disorder (MDD) without personality disorder, using the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of content analysis and grounded theory. BPD patients described themselves predominantly as helpful and sensitive; reported typical emotions were sadness, anger, and anxiety. MDD patients on the other hand reported numerous and various characteristics and emotions, including happiness, as well as sadness and anxiety. Other persons were characterized by the BPD group as egoistic and satisfied, while the MDD group described others as being balanced and secretive. BPD patients displayed an altruistic, superficial, and suffering self-image. Aggressive tendencies were only seen in other persons. Our findings support the concept of a self and relationship disturbance in BPD which is highly relevant for psychotherapy treatment.