ABSTRACT
Introduction: The past decade has seen some major changes in the diagnostics of prostate cancer. Progress in MR imaging has allowed us to better visualise prostate cancer and thus perform targeted biopsies of tumour suspect lesions. mpMRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy is a precise and cost-effective method to diagnose prostate cancer. Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarise our results in mpMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy between 2017 and 2019 and compare them with the findings in the current literature. Method: Between 2017 and 2019, fully 40, mpMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies were performed transperineally using the BioJet fusion system at Semmelweis University Urology Clinic. The MRI evaluations were done in line with the PI-RADS v2 guidelines. It was analysed whether the PI-RADS score, the location of the tumour, lesion size, the signs of extraprostatic extension, PSA/PSAD density and prostate volume have an influence on the outcome of mpMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy. Results: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 80% of the cases during targeted biopsies. The detection rate was 91%, 85%, and 20% for PI-RADS 5, 4 and 3 lesions, respectively. The detection rate was significantly higher for lesions located at the peripheral zone compared to the ones in the transitional zone (khi2(1) = 6.555, p = 0.010, Fisher-exact p = 0.017, V = 0.355). Signs of extraprostatic extension and higher PSAD correlated with better detection rate (khi2(1)= 7.704, p = 0.006, Fisher-exact p = 0.004, V = 0.355; and 0.47 ± 0.50 ng/ml2 vs. 0.18 ± 0.17 ng/ml2; Z = 3.447, p<0.001, respectively). The size of the lesions did not influence the outcome. The analysis showed a significant correlation between large prostate volumes and negative biopsies (50.9 ± 18.8 ml vs. 119.6 ± 91.6 ml; Z= 3.505, p<0.001). Conclusions: The detection rate of prostate cancer with targeted biopsies was higher than the data found in the international literature. The PI-RADS score, the location of the tumour, MRI signs of extraprostatic extension, PSAD and prostate volume had an influence on the detection rate. Our findings may promote a better selection of the best candidates for targeted biopsies in the future.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of subclavian artery stent fractures and to investigate their impact on in-stent restenosis development. METHODS: One hundred eight patients (65 females; median age, 58.3 years [interquartile range, 53.4-65.5 years]) with steno-occlusive disease of the first part of the subclavian artery who underwent stenting (N = 108 stents; balloon-expandable, 83.3%; self-expandable, 16.7%) between 2005 and 2015 and returned for a fluoroscopic examination of the implanted stents in 2017 were included in our study. Fractures were type I (single strut fracture), type II (multiple strut fractures without deformation), type III (multiple strut fractures with deformation), type IV (multiple strut fractures with acquired transection but without gap), or type V (multiple strut fractures with acquired transection with gap in the stent body). Stent patency was monitored by duplex ultrasound imaging. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests; Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic, and logistic regression analyses; as well as a log-rank test were used as statistical methods. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 73.8 months (interquartile range, 35.6-104.2 months). Thirty-eight fractures (35.2%) were detected; fractures were type I in 13, type II in 12, type III in 6, type IV in 4, and type V in 3 cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the presence of long (≥20 mm) lesions (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.4; P = .012) and heavy calcification (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.7; P = .002) to be significant independent predictors of stent fracture. The primary patency rates were significantly worse (P = .035) in patients with stent fracture compared with those without stent fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Stent fractures frequently occur. Patients with long and/or heavily calcified lesions require closer follow-up.
