Can baseline ultrasound results help to predict failure to achieve DAS28 remission after 1 year of tight control treatment in early RA patients?

BACKGROUND: At present, there are no prognostic parameters unequivocally predicting treatment failure in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We investigated whether baseline ultrasonography (US) findings of joints, when added to baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiographical data, could improve prediction of failure to achieve Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) remission (<2.6) at 1 year in newly diagnosed RA patients. METHODS: A multicentre cohort of newly diagnosed RA patients was followed prospectively for 1 year. US of the hands, wrists, and feet was performed at baseline. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographical parameters were recorded. Primary analysis was the prediction by logistic regression of the absence of DAS28 remission 12 months after diagnosis and start of therapy. RESULTS: Of 194 patients included, 174 were used for the analysis, with complete data available for 159. In a multivariate model with baseline DAS28 (odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.2), the presence of rheumatoid factor (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-5.1), and type of monitoring strategy (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.85), the addition of baseline US results for joints (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.04) did not significantly improve the prediction of failure to achieve DAS28 remission (likelihood ratio test, 1.04; p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: In an early RA population, adding baseline ultrasonography of the hands, wrists, and feet to commonly available baseline characteristics did not improve prediction of failure to achieve DAS28 remission at 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01752309 . Registered on 19 December 2012.

A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability with dose escalation of allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day used to attain a target serum urate concentration (sUr) < or =0.30 mmol/l (5 mg/dl). METHODS: A randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial in gout patients with renal function defined as a calculated creatinine clearance > or =50 ml/min. Patients were treated with 300 mg allopurinol or 100 mg benzbromarone once a day (stage 1). If sUr < or =0.30 mmol/l was not attained after 2 months, the dose was doubled to allopurinol 300 mg twice a day or benzbromarone 200 mg once a day (stage 2). The primary end point was treatment success in either of the two stages, defined as clinical tolerability and attainment of biochemical target sUr. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in stage 1; 36 received allopurinol and 29 received benzbromarone. Fifty-five patients (85%) were analysed at stage 1: the success rates were 8/31 (26%) and 13/25 (52%), respectively, and the difference was -0.26 (95% CI from -0.486 to -0.005), p = 0.049. At stage 2, the success rates were 21/27 (78%) and 18/23 (78%), respectively, and the difference was -0.005 (95% CI from -0.223 to 0.220), p = 1.00. Two patients stopped receiving allopurinol and three stopped receiving benzbromarone because of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the allopurinol dose from 300 to 600 mg/day and the benzbromarone dose from 100 to 200 mg/day according to the target sUr produced significantly higher success rates (both 78% successful in attaining sUr < or =0.30 mmol/l). No significant differences in treatment success between benzbromarone and allopurinol were found after dose escalation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN49563848).

Corticosteroid injections reduce size of rheumatoid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic rheumatoid nodules are frequently surgically treated. Injection with steroids might be an alternative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine whether injection with triamcinolon acetonide reduces the size of rheumatoid nodules, we randomized twenty patients with symptomatic nodules to either triamcinolon acetonide 40 mg/ml plus lidocaine 2% or lidocaine 1% (placebo). We measured the nodules before injection and 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. Possible side effects were recorded. RESULTS: We found that the volume of the nodules injected with triamcinolon acetonide reduced significantly (p = 0.011), from 130 to 8 mm(3) (median calculated size) at 12 weeks, compared with baseline. Furthermore, at 12 weeks, the difference between the groups was significant (p = 0.03). The median size of the placebo nodules diminished as well, from 358 to 237 mm(3), but this was not significant. Pain at injection was the only side effect, equally distributed in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Injection with triamcinolon acetonide seems to be an alternative for surgery of rheumatoid nodules. No adverse events occurred but the limited sample does not allow definitive conclusions.

Intermittent rises in plasma homocysteine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with higher dose methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of higher weekly maintenance dose methotrexate (MTX) (> or =25 mg/week) on plasma homocysteine concentrations in adults with RA. METHODS: Patients with RA were treated with high doses of MTX with adjuvant folic acid. Plasma homocysteine was determined at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 48 hours after subcutaneous MTX administration. Maximum homocysteine concentrations after MTX administration were compared with baseline concentrations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with RA (11 women) were included, with a median age of 61 years (range 31-72) and median disease duration 7 years (range 2-32). Median MTX dose was 30 mg (range 25-40). All patients received folic acid supplementation (5-30 mg/week). Median plasma homocysteine concentration at baseline was 10.1 mumol/l (range 6.6-12.7; normal 6-15). Homocysteine concentrations increased after MTX administration by a median of 2.5 mumol/l (range 0.7-5.1). Median maximum plasma homocysteine was significantly higher than at baseline. Peak homocysteine was reached after 12 hours. No relation between serum folate concentrations and plasma homocysteine concentrations was found. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA higher MTX doses with adjuvant folic acid do not increase baseline concentrations of homocysteine. An intermittent significant rise in plasma homocysteine occurs in the 48 hours after MTX administration.

Factors associated with toxicity, final dose, and efficacy of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study factors associated with toxicity, final dose, and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data were used from a randomised clinical 48 week trial on 411 patients with RA all treated with MTX, comparing folates and placebo. Logistic regression was used to study the relation between baseline variables and various dependent factors, including hepatotoxicity (alanine aminotransferase >/=3 x upper limit of normal), MTX withdrawal, final MTX dose >/=15 mg/week, and MTX efficacy. RESULTS: Addition of folates to MTX treatment was strongly related to the lack of hepatotoxicity. Next to this, high body mass index was related to the occurrence of hepatotoxicity. Prior gastrointestinal (GI) events and younger age were related to the adverse event, diarrhoea. Hepatotoxicity and GI adverse events were the main reason for MTX withdrawal, which in turn was associated with the absence of folate supplementation, body mass index, prior GI events, and female sex. Renal function (creatinine clearance >/=50 ml/min) was not associated with toxicity. Reaching a final dose of MTX of >/=15 mg/week was related to folate supplementation and the absence of prior GI events. Efficacy of MTX treatment was associated with low disease activity at baseline, male sex, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and lower creatinine clearance. CONCLUSIONS: MTX toxicity, final dose, and efficacy are influenced by folate supplementation. Baseline characteristics predicting the outcome of MTX treatment are mainly prior GI events, body mass index, sex, use of NSAIDs, and creatinine clearance.

Homocysteine and folate status in methotrexate-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study (i) the influence of methotrexate (MTX) therapy on homocysteine and folate metabolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), (ii) the influence of the C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) on the change in plasma homocysteine levels during MTX treatment, and (iii) the interference of folate and homocysteine metabolism with the efficacy and toxicity of treatment with MTX. METHODS: The 113 patients enrolled in this study were participating in a 48-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and toxicity of MTX treatment with and without folic or folinic acid supplementation. The MTX dose was 7.5 mg/week initially and increased to a maximum of 25 mg/week if necessary. Concentrations of total folate, 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate (in serum and in erythrocytes) and of homocysteine, cysteine and cysteine-glycine and the MTHFR genotype were determined before the start of the study, after 6 weeks, and after 48 weeks or on withdrawal from the study. Blood was drawn from fasting patients at a standardized time in the morning, 16 h after intake of MTX. The laboratory results were related to parameters of efficacy and toxicity of MTX treatment. RESULTS: Baseline values were distributed equally in the three treatment groups. The mean plasma homocysteine level (normal range 6-15 micromol/l) before the start of MTX was relatively high in all groups: 15.4 micromol/l [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.5 to 17.2] in the MTX plus placebo group (n=39), 14.3 micromol/l (95% CI 12.2 to 16.4) in the MTX plus folic acid group (n=35) and 15.9 micromol/l (95% CI 13.7 to 18.1) in the MTX plus folinic acid group (n=39). After 48 weeks of MTX therapy, the mean homocysteine level showed an increase in the placebo group (+3.6 micromol/l, 95% CI 1.7 to 5.6). In contrast, a decrease was observed in the groups supplemented with folic or folinic acid (folic acid, -2.7 micromol/l, 95% CI -1.4 to -4.0; folinic acid, -1.6 micromol/l, 95% CI -0.1 to -3.0). The differences in the change in plasma homocysteine level between the placebo group and each of the two folate-supplemented groups were statistically significant (P<0.0001), contrary to the difference between the folic and folinic acid groups (P=0.26). Linear regression analysis showed that the change in plasma homocysteine level was statistically significantly associated with folic or folinic acid supplementation (P=0.0001) but not with the presence or absence of the C677T mutation in the MTHFR gene. Homozygous mutants had a higher plasma homocysteine concentration at baseline. No relationship was found between the change in disease activity and the change in homocysteine concentration or the mean homocysteine concentration after 48 weeks of MTX therapy. Toxicity-related discontinuation of MTX treatment was not associated with the change in homocysteine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose MTX treatment in RA patients leads to an increased plasma homocysteine level. Concomitant folate supplementation with either folic or folinic acid decreases the plasma homocysteine level and consequently protects against potential cardiovascular risks. No relationship was found between the change in homocysteine concentration and the presence or absence of the C677T mutation in the MTHFR gene. Homocysteine metabolism was not associated with efficacy or toxicity of MTX treatment.

The C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: a genetic risk factor for methotrexate-related elevation of liver enzymes in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the possible relationship between the C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and the toxicity and efficacy of treatment with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Genotype analysis of the MTHFR gene was done in 236 patients who started MTX treatment with (n = 157) or without (n = 79) folic or folinic acid supplementation. Outcomes were parameters of efficacy of MTX treatment, patient withdrawal due to adverse events, discontinuation of MTX treatment because of elevated liver enzyme levels, and the total occurrence of elevated liver enzyme levels during the study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the relationship between the presence of the MTHFR C677T mutation and toxicity outcomes of MTX treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of the patients showed the homozygous (T/T) or heterozygous (T/C) mutation. The presence of the C677CT or C677TT genotypes was associated with an increased risk of discontinuing MTX treatment because of adverse events (relative risk 2.01; 95% confidence interval 1.09, 3.70), mainly due to an increased risk of elevated liver enzyme levels (relative risk 2.38; 95% confidence interval 1.06, 5.34). Efficacy parameters were not significantly different between the patients with and those without the mutation. CONCLUSION: The C677T mutation is the first identified genetic risk factor for elevated alanine aminotransferase values during MTX treatment in patients with RA. We postulate that the incidence of clinically important elevation of liver enzyme levels during MTX treatment is mediated by homocysteine metabolism. Supplementation with folic or folinic acid reduced the risk of toxicity-related discontinuation of MTX treatment both in patients with and in patients without the mutation.

Influence of sulphasalazine, methotrexate, and the combination of both on plasma homocysteine concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of sulphasalazine (SSZ), methotrexate (MTX), and the combination (COMBI) of both on plasma homocysteine and to study the relation between plasma homocysteine and their clinical effects. METHODS: 105 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were randomised between SSZ (2-3 g/day), MTX (7.5-15 mg/week), and the COMBI (same dose range) and evaluated double blindly during 52 weeks. Plasma homocysteine, serum folate concentrations, and vitamin B12 were measured. The influence of the C677T mutation of the enzyme methyl-enetetrahydrofolatereductase (MTHFR) gene was analysed. RESULTS: A slight trend towards increased efficacy and an increased occurrence of minor gastrointestinal toxicity was present in the COMBI group, no differences existed clinically between SSZ and MTX. Only a slight and temporary increase in plasma homocysteine was found in the SSZ group, in contrast with the persistent rise in the MTX group and the even greater increase in the COMBI patients. Patients homozygous for the mutation in the MTHFR gene had significantly higher baseline homocysteine, heterozygous MTHFR genotype induced a significantly higher plasma homoeysteine at week 52 compared with no mutation. No correlation was found between clinical efficacy variables and homocysteine. Patients with gastrointestinal toxicity had a significantly greater increase in homocysteine. CONCLUSION: A persistent increase in plasma homocysteine concentrations was observed in patients treated with MTX alone and more pronounced in combination with SSZ, in contrast with SSZ alone. An increase in plasma homocysteine is related to the C677T mutation in MTHFR. A relation in the change in homocysteine concentrations with (gastrointestinal) toxicity was found, no relation with clinical efficacy existed.

ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. American College of Rheumatology European League of Associations for Rheumatology.

We compared the validity of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) definitions of response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials. US: ACR and EULAR improvement criteria were calculated in 7 large randomized RA clinical trials. The discriminant validity of the response criteria between treatment groups was studied using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared value. To compare both sets of criteria the chi-squared ratio was determined for each trial. Europe: In 2 large randomized RA clinical trials, ACR and EULAR criteria were calculated, once with extensive and once with 28 joint counts. The classification of patients with these 4 criteria were compared with each other using cross tables. We further studied the difference in response between treatment groups per trial, the association of response with patient and investigator assessment of improvement, and the association of response with radiological progression. US: The chi-squared ratio for most trials was close to 1. There was no clear pattern suggesting that the discriminant validity of the ACR criteria was stronger than the discriminant validity of the EULAR definition of response or vice versa. Europe: Conflicting results between ACR and EULAR were present in only 3% of patients in both trials. The discriminant validity of all 4 criteria (ACR and EULAR with reduced and extensive joint counts) was comparable. All criteria were related with the overall assessment of improvement by both investigator and patient. The association with radiographic progression was comparable for EULAR and ACR improvement criteria. There is a high level of agreement between ACR and EULAR improvement classification, and their validity is equivalent. The discriminating potential of the criteria between treatment groups is comparable, as is the association with patient's and investigator's overall assessment and with radiographic progression.

Pharmacotherapeutic combination strategies with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in established rheumatoid arthritis.

Pharmacotherapy is still the cornerstone in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Due to several reasons the pharmacotherapeutic strategy has changed dramatically in the past decades. It has become clear that in most cases single treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is insufficient to control the disease on the long term. This is the main reason why combinations of second-line agents are increasingly being used in the treatment of established RA. Many different ways of prescribing combination treatment and a large number of different combinations have been published. However definite conclusions which drugs to combine or what strategy to apply are difficult to make as solid studies which enable these conclusions are sparse. Several studies have shown that the best opportunity to achieve a good response is to use a set-up approach, in addition different studies have shown that corticosteroids do have a profound effect on disease activity variables.

Clinically important drug interactions with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Rheumatic diseases are mostly chronic in nature and often require long term drug treatment. An increasing number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used earlier in the course of disease and increasingly in combination with each other. Often there is comorbidity with ensuing pharmacotherapy, especially in the elderly, and therefore the risk of unwanted drug interactions increases. Awareness of these interactions is important in order to either avoid or manage them. Antimalarials, gold, penicillamine (D-penicillamine), sulfasalazine and azathioprine have few clinically important drug interactions. The renal excretion of the antifolate methotrexate is affected by drugs that influence kidney function. This is of particular importance in patients with compromised renal function, e.g. the elderly. Other drugs with influence on folate metabolism, such as trimethoprim, should not be given concomitantly. Cyclosporin is an agent recently introduced in rheumatological practice, and shows a myriad of clinically significant drug interactions mainly based on interference with its metabolic degradation by cytochrome P450 3A, leading to increased or decreased blood concentrations and toxicity or lack of effect. Although most of these interactions with cyclosporin are described in organ transplant patients, they may apply to rheumatological practice as well.

Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts.

OBJECTIVE: To study the validity of response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that included 28-joint counts instead of more comprehensive joint counts. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 105 patients treated with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or both, response was evaluated at week 52. Both European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology definitions of response, with comprehensive as well as simplified joint counts, were calculated. We studied the differences between the criteria with and without simplified joint counts, the discriminating capacity between treatment groups, and the association with change in functional capacity and joint damage. RESULTS: Response criteria that included 28-joint counts classified patients' responses more conservatively. No differences between treatment groups were found with either set of response criteria. The association with change in functional capacity was significant in all cases. All response criteria were significantly associated with radiographic progression of RA. CONCLUSION: Improvement criteria that include 28-joint counts are as valid as the original improvement criteria that included more comprehensive joint counts.

Combination of sulphasalazine and methotrexate versus the single components in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 52 week clinical trial.

To compare the efficacy of sulphasalazine, methotrexate, and the combination of both in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs previously, we conducted a double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, clinical trial. One hundred and five patients with active, early RA, rheumatoid factor and/or HLA DR1/4 positive were randomized between sulphasalazine (SSZ) 2000 (maximum 3000) mg daily, or methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 (maximum 15) mg weekly, or the combination (COMBI) of both, and were followed up by a single observer for 52 weeks. The mean change over time per patient, including all visits, in Disease Activity Score (DAS) was: SSZ: -1.6 (95% CI -2.0 to -1.2); MTX: -1.7 (-2.0 to -1.4); COMBI: -1.9 (-2.2 to -1.6); the difference week 0-week 52 (SSZ, MTX, COMBI respectively); DAS: -1.8, -2.0, -2.3, Ritchie articular index: -9.2, -9.5, -10.6, swollen joints: -9.2, -12.4, -14.3, erythrocyte sedimentation rate: -17, -21, -28. Nausea occurred significantly more in the COMBI group. The numbers of drop-outs due to toxicity were SSZ 9, MTX 2, COMBI 5. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in efficacy between combination and single therapy, only a modest trend favouring COMBI. The results of MTX and SSZ were very comparable. Nausea occurred more often in the COMBI group: the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly.

Combination of second-line antirheumatic drugs.

Single drug therapy is often not satisfactory in the treatment of chronic arthritis. The combination of second-line antirheumatic drugs is therefore increasingly employed. Various strategies of combining drugs can be used, starting with combinations or adding agents in case of insufficient effect of single therapy. Effective combinations have to be found empirically because lack of knowledge about pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics often hinders rational choices. Few controlled studies on combinations of second-line antirheumatic drugs exist, results suggesting very moderately increased efficacy and increased toxicity. Recently, results of combinations, mainly with methotrexate, have become available. Combining this agent with azathioprine did not offer advantages. Cyclosporin added to insufficiently effective methotrexate possibly has some value and antimalarials combined with methotrexate may be beneficial regarding effectivity and/or toxicity. Methotrexate added to insufficiently effective sulphasalazine seems to be better than methotrexate alone, although this combination when used from the start of the therapy was disappointing. Triple therapy of the latter combination together with hydroxychloroquine turned out to be superior to single methotrexate and to the combination of sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. Surprisingly, the toxicity of these combinations was mainly comparable to single therapy. In conclusion, combinations of second-line antirheumatic drugs have a role, although not yet clearly defined, in the therapy of chronic arthritis.

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis patients with slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARDs).

Treatment with slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARDs) is nowadays initiated earlier in the disease course, preferably before any radiographic damage has occurred. SAARDs have the ability to decrease inflammatory synovitis as measured by clinical and laboratory variables, and there is some evidence that they improve physical function and decrease the progression rate of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. There is a clear difference in survival time between the various SAARDs. The efficacy/toxicity profiles of the SAARDs show equal variation. Rank order of prescription or disease duration may have an effect on drug survival, but different treatment strategies are also important sources of variation. Efficacy might be improved by combining different SAARDs (starting with a multiple drug regimen, or adding a drug to the first one), but further research is necessary to prove this hypothesis.

Combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pharmacokinetic analysis and relationship to clinical response.

1. The influence of sulphasalazine (SASP) on the pharmacokinetics of low dose methotrexate (MTX) and the relation between pharmacokinetic variables and clinical response was studied in 15 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite > 6 months of SASP treatment. 2. SASP was stopped for 2 weeks. Thereafter a single oral dose of 7.5 mg MTX was administered after a standard breakfast. Blood was sampled initially every 30 min, thereafter hourly during 8 h. Urine was sampled every hour. Then 2000 mg SASP daily + 7.5 mg MTX weekly was given. After 4 weeks the same procedure was repeated supplemented with concomitant administration of 1000 mg SASP. Clinical measurements included Ritchie articular index, number of swollen joints, ESR and the disease activity score. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a two-compartment model with first order absorption and lag time. Results are given as mean (s.d.). Paired t-test or signed rank test were applied in the statistical analysis. 3. Pharmacokinetics of MTX without vs with SASP, means +/- s.d. were follows: AUC: 673 +/- 179 vs 628 +/- 210 (95% confidence interval [CI] of the difference was -71 to 159) ng ml-1, MRT: 5.2 +/- 1.3 vs 5.2 +/- 1.1 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.4) h, t1/2,z: 4.3 +/- 1.1 vs 4.2 +/- 1.1 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.5) h, V/F: 59.3 +/- 29.3 vs 65.5 +/- 25.3 (95% -23.8 to 11.4) 1, CL/F: 12.3 +/- 5.0 vs 13.5 +/- 4.8 (95% CI -4.5 to 2.3) 1 h-1. CLR/F: 6.2 +/- 1.3 vs 6.3 +/- 2.1 (95% CI -1.3 to 1.1) l h-1. All P values were > or = 0.3. 4. A weak correlation existed between the change of ESR and the MRT, the t1/2,z and the V/F (Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.43, 0.50 and 0.50 respectively, 0.05 < P < 0.1). 5. There is no significant influence of chronic SASP administration on the pharmacokinetics of MTX or vice versa. Of the clinical variables, only the ESR correlated consistently with some pharmacokinetic variables on MTX.

Combining sulphasalazine and methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: early clinical impressions.

The use of combinations of second line antirheumatic agents (SLAs) is increasing. There are several reasons for combination therapy, e.g. the unsatisfactory effects of single therapy. Strategies for combining SLAs are to begin with combinations, or to add one or more agents to another. The strategy of adding one agent to another is illustrated by a study of 40 patients having insufficient effect from sulphasalazine (SASP). Patients were randomized between methotrexate (MTX) and the combination of SASP and MTX. The patients were evaluated by a single observer in an open design. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The mean decrease in disease activity score was significantly greater and occurred earlier in the combination group. This favourable response was also present in the other efficacy variables. The incidence of toxicity was equal in both groups. These results support the strategy of adding MTX to SASP when combining these second line antirheumatic drugs.

Effect of methotrexate alone or in combination with sulphasalazine on the production and circulating concentrations of cytokines and their antagonists. Longitudinal evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

In a recent study from our group, the combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine (MTX + SASP) seemed superior to MTX alone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To assess the impact of these therapies on the cytokine cascade, the in vitro production and circulating concentrations of several cytokines and endogenous cytokine antagonists were measured in 30 healthy controls and longitudinally in a subset of 26 patients enrolled in this study. Compared to controls, RA patients had significantly higher circulating concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble receptors for tumour necrosis factor (sTNFR), soluble receptors for interleukin-2 (sIL-2R) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonists (IL-1RA), and their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) showed a higher spontaneous production of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and IL-1RA (both secreted and cell-associated) and a higher stimulated production of cell-associated TNF alpha, IL-1RA and (to a lesser extent) IL-1 beta. Treatment with MTX alone (n = 12) or combined with SASP (n = 14), resulted in significant reductions of circulating IL-6 and sIL-2R but did not alter IL-1 beta, TNF alpha or IL-1RA concentrations. Decreases in circulating levels of sTNFR and in the in vitro production of cell-associated IL-1 beta and IL-1RA after stimulation were only observed in patients treated with MTX + SASP. The concentrations of IL-1RA and sTNFR in the circulation exceeded moderately those of IL-1 beta and TNF alpha but this is probably insufficient to block IL-1 and TNF alpha activity. In conclusion, therapy with MTX alone or with SASP modulates IL-6 and sIL-2R concentrations in RA. Decreased production of IL-1 beta and IL-1RA and circulating sTNFR levels were only observed during therapy with MTX + SASP. Whether this relates to the better clinical effect observed with the combination therapy remains to be investigated. Circulating levels of IL-6, sIL-2R and sTNFR seem useful markers of disease activity in RA.

Oral steroids as bridge therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients starting with parenteral gold. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

The efficacy of oral prednisone as bridge therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was studied. Forty patients starting aurothioglucose were randomized to receive either prednisone or placebo for 18 weeks. The dose was 10 mg/day in the first 12 weeks, 7.5 mg/day in weeks 13 and 14, 5 mg/day in weeks 15 and 16, and 2.5 mg/day in weeks 17 and 18. Patients were followed for 44 weeks. We found that disease activity was significantly lower in the prednisone group as early as week 1 and continued up to week 12. Response to prednisone was noticed in 60% of the patients. After tapering prednisone, a rebound deterioration was noticed at weeks 20 and 24 in 58% of the responders. No significant differences in X-ray progression were found between the two groups. We concluded that oral prednisone (10 mg/day) significantly reduces short-term disease activity in 60% of patients with active RA. The rebound deterioration after tapering the dose means that bridge therapy with prednisone using this dose-reduction scheme is not recommended.