Assessing short-term feed efficiency and its association with biological markers in herbage-fed dairy cows.

Feed efficiency is an important trait of dairy production. However, assessing feed efficiency is constrained by the associated cost and difficulty in measuring individual feed intake, especially on pastures. The objective of this study was to investigate short-term feed efficiency traits of herbage-fed dairy cows and screening of potential biomarkers (n = 238). Derived feed efficiency traits were ratio-based (i.e., feed conversion ratio (FCR) and N use efficiency (NUE)) or residual-based (i.e., residual feed intake (RFI), residual energy intake (REI), and residual N intake (RNI)). Thirty-eight Holstein and 16 Swiss Fleckvieh dairy cows underwent a 7-d measurement period during mid- and/or late-lactation. The experimental data (n = 100 measurement points) covered different lactational and herbage-fed system situations: mid-lactation grazing (n = 56), late-lactation grazing (n = 28), and late-lactation barn feeding (n = 16). During each measuring period, the individual herbage intake of each cow was estimated using the n-alkane marker technique. For each cow, biomarkers representing milk constituents (n = 109), animal characteristics (n = 13), behaviour, and activity (n = 46), breath emissions (n = 3), blood constituents (n = 35), surface, and rectal temperature (n = 29), hair cortisol (n = 1), and near-infrared (NIR) spectra of faeces and milk (n = 2) were obtained. The relationships between biomarkers and efficiency traits were statistically analysed with univariate linear regression and for NIR spectra using partial least squares regression with feed efficiency traits. The feed efficiency traits were interrelated with each other (r: -0.57 to -0.86 and 0.49-0.81). The biomarkers showed varying R2 values in explaining the variability of feed efficiency traits (FCR: 0.00-0.66, NUE: 0.00-0.74, RFI: 0.00-0.56, REI: 0.00-0.69, RNI: 0.00-0.89). Overall, the feed efficiency traits were best explained by NIR spectral characteristics of milk and faeces (R2: 0.25-0.89). Biomarkers show potential for predicting feed efficiency in herbage-fed dairy cows. NIR spectra data analysis of milk and faeces presents a promising method for estimating individual feed efficiency upon further validation of prediction models. Future applications will depend on the ability to improve the robustness of biomarkers to predict feed efficiency in a greater variety of environments (locations), managing conditions, feeding systems, production intensities, and other aspects.

Functional bracing treatment for stable type B ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND: In general, stable type B ankle fractures are treated conservatively with cast immobilization or a walking boot during six weeks. Some disadvantages of casting are joint stiffness, muscle wasting and lack of comfort. This study was designed to evaluate whether functional treatment with a removable brace is a safe and more comfortable alternative. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial. In the period March 2013 - May 2015, 44 patients visiting the emergency department due to a stable type B ankle fracture were included. During the first week both groups received a splint. After one week the patients were randomized: one group received a cast, the other a removable brace. For outcome Olerud & Molander Ankle Score, Visual Analogue Score for comfort and pain, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle score questionnaire, EuroQol-5D and range of motion were used. RESULTS: 44 patients participated (21 cast, 23 brace). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. After 6 weeks, VAS for comfort (cast vs brace; 5.74 vs 7.21; p = 0.02) and total range of motion (40° vs 49°; p = 0.00) showed significant differences in favour of the brace. VAS pain (3.15 vs 2.05; p = 0.16), OMA-score (51.75 vs 61.32; p = 0.22) en EuroQoL-5D (7.26 vs 6.74; p = 0.33) did not show significant differences. Week 52 showed no significant differences at OMA-score (89.29 vs 96.18; p = 0.16), EuroQoL-5D (6.00 vs 5.35; p = 0.15), VAS pain (1.07 vs 0.82; p = 0.69) and AAOS score (91.71 vs 96.06; p = 0.21). No complications occurred in both groups. CONCLUSION: Functional bracing showed significant differences for the VAS comfort score and range of motion at 6 weeks compared to casting. After a year no significant differences were found. Treatment with a brace is a safe and more comfortable option for stable type B ankle fractures.

The effect of an education programme (MEDIAS 2 BSC) of non-intensive insulin treatment regimens for people with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, multi-centre trial.

AIMS: A self-management oriented education programme (MEDIAS 2 BSC) for people with Type 2 diabetes who are on a non-intensive insulin treatment regimen was developed. In a randomized, multi-centre trial, the effect of MEDIAS 2 BSC was compared with an established education programme that acted as a control group. METHODS: The primary outcome was the impact of MEDIAS 2 BSC on glycaemic control. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, hypoglycaemia unawareness, diabetes-related distress, diabetes knowledge, quality of life and self-care behaviour. RESULTS: In total, 182 participants were randomized to the control group or MEDIAS 2 BSC [median age 64.0 (interquartile range 58.0-68.5) vs. 63.5 (57.0-70.0) years; HbA1c 62.8 ± 12.7 mmol/mol vs. 63.7 ± 14.0 mmol/mol; 7.9% ± 1.2% vs. 8.0% ± 1.3%]. After a 6-month follow-up, there was a mean decrease in HbA1c of 3.5 mmol/mol (0.32%) in the control group and 6.7 mmol/mol (0.61%) in MEDIAS 2 BSC. After adjusting for baseline differences and study centre, the mean difference between the groups was -3.3 mmol/mol [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.54 to -5.90 mmol/mol] [-0.30% (95% CI -0.05 to -0.54)] in favour of MEDIAS 2 BSC (P = 0.018). There were no increases in severe hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemia unawareness. The education programmes had no significant effects on psychosocial outcome variables. CONCLUSION: MEDIAS 2 BSC was more effective in lowering HbA1c than the control condition. MEDIAS 2 BSC is a safe educational tool that improves glycaemic control without increasing the risk for hypoglycaemia. (Clinical Trials Registry No; NCT 02748239).

How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).

AIMS: To compare the properties of the two most commonly used assessment tools for diabetes distress, the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), in order to discriminate their psychometric capabilities and functions. METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-eight people with diabetes (67% Type 1, 33% Type 2) were cross-sectionally assessed with the PAID, the DDS and further self-report scales regarding coping, quality of life, depressive symptoms and self-care, and medical data were gained. We analysed the PAID and DDS for areas of contentual/psychometric divergence in assessing diabetes distress and compared their associations with criteria of interest. RESULTS: Content analysis: The PAID covers a greater variety of emotional concerns and shows a stronger focus on food-related problems and complications. The DDS is more reflective of physician-related distress and problems concerning diabetes self-management. Psychometric analysis: Exploratory factor analyses revealed four-factor structures of both scales, explaining 60% (PAID) and 67% (DDS) of variance. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that single-factor and four-factor models fit the data. Total scales proved high and subscales mostly satisfactory reliability. Associations with criteria of interest: The PAID was significantly more strongly associated with dysfunctional coping styles, quality of life and depressive symptoms. The DDS showed significantly stronger associations with diabetes self-care and metabolic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results support both PAID and DDS as good self-report measures of diabetes distress. The observed contentual/psychometric differences suggest that a justified choice with regard to the intended clinical or scientific purpose can improve the acquisition of the required data.

Longitudinal relationship of diabetes-related distress and depressive symptoms: analysing incidence and persistence.

AIM: To investigate the longitudinal bi-directionality of diabetes-related distress and depressive symptoms. METHODS: A total of 509 patients receiving intensified insulin therapy completed the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale questionnaire for the assessment of depressive symptoms as well as the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire for the assessment of diabetes-related distress at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Separate logistic and linear regression analyses for incidence and persistence were performed with demographic (age, gender, BMI) and medical (diabetes type, HbA1c , diabetes duration, late complications) control variables. RESULTS: Diabetes-related distress at baseline increased the risk of the incidence of elevated depressive symptoms by 2.56-fold (odds ratio 2.56; 95% CI 1.15-5.72; P = 0.02) when controlling for demographic and medical variables. In addition, diabetes-related distress at baseline doubled the chance of the persistence of elevated depressive symptoms (odds ratio 2.04, 95% CI 1.04-3.99; P = 0.04) when controlling for demographic and medical variables. The chance of having persistent elevated diabetes-related distress was increased 5.94-fold (odds ratio 5.94, 95% CI 2.60-13.59; P < 0.0001) when elevated depressive symptoms were present at baseline. None of the medical variables had an influence on incidence or persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes-related distress was identified as a risk factor for the incidence and persistence of depressive symptoms. Reducing diabetes-related distress could help to prevent the development of elevated depressive symptoms. Furthermore, depressive symptoms were identified as an amplifier for diabetes-related distress. Diabetes-related distress and depressive symptoms were independent risk factors for each other and should be monitored in routine care to disentangle their influence.

Assessment of diabetes acceptance can help identify patients with ineffective diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control.

AIMS: To estimate the associations between insufficient diabetes acceptance and relevant diabetes outcomes. METHODS: A total of 320 patients completed questionnaires on diabetes non-acceptance (the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire), diabetes distress (the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale), depressive mood (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), coping with illness (the Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness), self-care activities (the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure) and quality of life (the Short Form-36 Health Questionnaire). A six-item version of the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire showing good reliability and validity was established, and the associations between insufficient acceptance and clinical outcomes were estimated. RESULTS: Higher diabetes non-acceptance correlated significantly with less active coping (-0.37), reduced self-care (-0.43) and higher HbA1c levels (0.31), higher diabetes distress (0.53) and more depressive symptoms (0.36). Correlations of diabetes non-acceptance with diabetes self-care/glycaemic control were significantly higher than were those of depressive mood or diabetes distress with these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Low diabetes acceptance is associated with impaired self-care and glycaemic control. Assessment of diabetes acceptance may facilitate the detection of patients at high risk and may present an essential target for treatments to improve diabetes control that is more relevant than elevated depressive mood or diabetes distress.

The Barmer study: impact of standardized warming of the injection site to enhance insulin absorption and reduce prandial insulin requirements and hypoglycemia in obese patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this prospective controlled study was to investigate the impact of standardized injection-site warming on prandial rapid acting insulin dose and glycemic control when studied under real-world conditions. METHODS: All 145 participating patients (51 female, 94 male, 13 type 1 and 132 type 2 patients, age: 61.6 ± 8.4 yrs, HbA1c: 7.19 ± 0.50%) were treated with intensive insulin glargine and short-acting insulin analog therapy. After a 4 week treatment optimization run-in period, patients were randomized to continue therapy for three months without (control) or with a local injection-site warming device (InsuPad * ). Observation parameters included HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycemia, body weight and adverse events. RESULTS: HbA1c improved in both arms until study end (control group: 6.3 ± 0.5%; injection-site warming device: 6.3 ± 0.5%; both p < 0.001 vs. baseline). To achieve this good control, patients in the control group needed to increase the daily prandial insulin dose by 8.1% (from 66 ± 31 U to 71 ± 38 U, p < 0.05) with stable basal insulin requirements. Patients who used the injection-site warming device required less prandial insulin (70 ± 43 U to 55 ± 34 U; -19%, p < 0.001) and slightly more basal insulin (+3.9%). Total daily insulin dose increased in the control group (+3.7%) and decreased with warming device use (-8.6%, p < 0.001). The number of hypoglycemic events (<63 mg/dL) during the observation period was higher in the control group (6.2 ± 9.9/patient vs. injection-site warming device: 3.3 ± 4.8/patient, p < 0.05). Main study limitations can be seen in the open label design reliability of the collected dose information and the very obese patient cohort. CONCLUSION: When treating obese patients to target with insulin therapy, use of an injection-site warming device for 3 months resulted in a lower frequency of hypoglycemic events and a reduction in prandial insulin analog requirements. If these results are confirmed in other patient populations, an injection-site warming device may be useful in achieving treatment targets with a safer and more efficient basal bolus therapy in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Initial combination of linagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: efficacy and safety in a randomised, double-blind 1-year extension study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in initial combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This 1-year randomised, double-blind study was an extension of a 6-month randomised controlled trial, in which adults with type 2 diabetes received one of six treatment regimens (linagliptin 2.5 mg plus metformin 500 mg bid, linagliptin 2.5 mg plus metformin mg 1000 bid, metformin 1000 mg bid, metformin 500 mg bid, linagliptin 5 mg qd or placebo). In the extension, patients in the first three treatment groups continued their regimen (non-switched group, n = 333) while the metformin 500 mg bid, linagliptin 5 mg qd and placebo groups were re-randomised to one of the three continuing regimens (switched group, n = 233). RESULTS: All three non-switched groups maintained reductions in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c; mean ± standard deviation reductions across the 1.5-year period: linagliptin 2.5 plus metformin 1000 bid, -1.63 ± 1.05%; linagliptin 2.5 plus metformin 500 bid, -1.32 ± 1.06%; metformin 1000 bid, -1.25 ± 0.91%) while the switched groups showed additional HbA1c reductions. During the extension, there were no clinically meaningful changes in body weight in any group. Adverse event rates were similar between groups, with most events being mild or moderate, and the incidence of investigator-defined hypoglycaemia was low, with no severe events. DISCUSSION: Initial combination of linagliptin and metformin was well tolerated over the 1-year extension period, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, and improved glycaemic control vs. metformin alone. CONCLUSION: The initial combination of linagliptin and metformin appears to provide a useful treatment option in patients whose blood glucose levels are increased to an extent that metformin monotherapy may not achieve treatment targets.

[Insulin degludec--a new basal insulin for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes]. / Insulin degludec--ein neues Basalinsulin zur Behandlung von Typ-1- und Typ-2-Diabetes.

After subcutaneous injection, IDeg self-associates to form multihexamer chains that slowly dissociate into monomers. This results in a duration of action of more than 42 hours as well as a smooth level action profile with low intra-individual variability. Pharmacokinetic studies foun IDeg to have a half-life of approximately 25 hours which is considerably longer than that from other current insulin formulations. Based on these properties, IDeg demonstrated low risk for nocturnal hypoglycaemic events in the clinical study program. Concurrently, phase 3 studies have provided evidence for a non-inferior glucose lowering effect when compared to other currently available basal insulin formulations. Moreover, the long duration of action suggests a flexible handling which could be better adapted to patients' needs in daily routine. This article gives an overview of the mechanism of action of IDeg and the latest results from phase 2 and phase 3 studies.

Comparison of stepwise addition of prandial insulin to a basal-bolus regimen when basal insulin is insufficient for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: results of the OSIRIS study.

AIM: The metabolic efficacy of adding prandial insulin in a stepwise manner to a straightforward basal-bolus regimen was compared in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), suboptimally controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) and once-daily basal insulin. METHODS: In this international randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, 811 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes using basal insulin were switched to insulin glargine (GLAR) for 6 months while continuing OADs. Patients with HbA(1c) > 7% and FPG < 120 mg/dL (n=476) were then randomized to either group 1, GLAR+metformin (MET)+3×insulin glulisine (GLU), group 2, GLAR+MET+1-3×GLU, or group 3, GLAR+MET+insulin secretagogue (IS)+1-3×GLU, for 12 months. Objectives were to show the non-inferiority of efficacy of group 2 vs group 1 and vs group 3. Non-inferiority of group 2 vs group 1 was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the HbA(1c) difference was ≤ to 0.4%. RESULTS: The adjusted HbA(1c) difference of group 2 vs 1 for the per-protocol population crossed the non-inferiority margin (0.228, 95% CI: -0.018-0.473). There was significantly less weight gain in group 2 compared with group 1, but adverse events were otherwise similar between the two groups. In patients with HbA(1c) < 8% at baseline, non-inferiority was achieved in group 2 vs group 1. CONCLUSION: Although non-inferiority was not achieved, stepwise intensification of GLU added to GLAR showed efficacy close to that of the basal-bolus approach and with significantly less weight gain.

[Bariatric surgery in a patient with adipositas permagna and uncontrolled insulin resistance]. / Bariatrischer Eingriff bei einem Patienten mit Adipositas permagna und nicht beherrschbarer Insulinresistenz.

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 58-year-old patient had a 21 years history of diabetes mellitus and multiple diabetic complications. In addition he suffered from severe obesity with a body mass index of 42.7 kg/m² and a waist circumference of 141 cm. After all treatment options according to the national guidelines had failed the patient was admitted to a diabetes clinic. INVESTIGATIONS: All approaches on the metabolic ward to control insulin resistance failed as well and finally blood glucose levels could only be stabilized with the aid of continous subcutaneous insulin infusion with more than 500 units per day. The patient's quality of life and the options for physical activity were extremely limited. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Thus, the indication of bariatric surgery was discussed with the interdisciplinary team of specialists and with the patient. After informed consent a Roux-Y gastric bypass was established with the aid of minimal invasive surgery. Already two weeks after the operation insulin demand had decreased to 100 units per day and metabolic control and the treatment could be further optimized. Three months later the body mass index was reduced to 34.3 kg/m². The treatment improved the patient's quality of life, optimized metabolic control and resulted last but not least in lower costs for the diabetes treatment. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery is an additional option in the treatment of obesity and insulin resistance. The collaboration between diabetologists and bariatric surgeons is a prerequisite for the successful selection of patients and for longterm control after surgery.

[Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis. Bidirectional relationship and clinical implications. A consensus document]. / Diabetes mellitus und Parodontitis. Wechselbeziehung und klinische Implikationen. Ein Konsensuspapier.

Diabetes and periodontitis are chronic diseases with an increasing prevalence in the German population. There is a bi-directional relationship between both diseases. Diabetes promotes the occurrence, the progression and the severity of periodontitis. Periodontitis complicates the glycemic control of diabetes, increases the risk of diabetes-associated complications and possibly even of its onset. In view of the existing evidence, that is still not sufficiently communicated within the medical community, an expert panel consisting of four diabetologists and four periodontists has addressed the following questions: What is the effect of diabetes mellitus on periodontitis and on periodontal therapy? What is the effect of periodontitis on diabetes mellitus? What are the practical consequences, that result for interdisciplinary treatment strategies? The treatment of periodontal infections should become an integral part of the management of diabetes, whereas glycemic control is a prerequisite for successful periodontal therapy.

[Preventive measures and organization of a regional shared-care system for foot treatment]. / Präventive Massnahmen und Organisation eines regionalen Shared-care-Systems zur Fussversorgung.

A shared-care system should be established to treat diabetic foot wounds. This means including different professions and institutions to optimize the treatment of these patients in respect of medical, psychological and social aspects. This procedure is very well described in the national guidelines of treatment of type 2 diabetes to prevent and treat diabetic foot complications. In the treatment of the diabetic foot syndrome the establishment of such a shared-care system has to recognize the wound classification and the underlying risk of patients. In this article the stage-adjusted approach and the duties of the different levels of responsibility are described.

Short-term effects on patient satisfaction of continuous glucose monitoring with the GlucoDay with real-time and retrospective access to glucose values: a crossover study.

BACKGROUND: This randomized crossover trial examines the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with real-time access (RTA) to glucose data versus CGM with a retrospective analysis (RA) of glucose data regarding satisfaction with CGM and other patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Participants used the CGM device (GlucoDay, Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy) twice. In one study phase, patients were allowed RTA to, and in the other phase RA of, current glucose values. The order of these two conditions was randomized. At baseline and after the first and second trials, subjects completed questionnaires (Continuous Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Scale) about perceived satisfaction with CGM. They also completed the Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire, a state anxiety scale (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and a depression scale (Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale). RESULTS: Fifty patients with type 1 diabetes (41.7 +/- 12.3 years old, diabetes duration of 14.75 +/- 11.9 years, 48% female, hemoglobin A1c 8.1 +/- 1.5%, years of education 10.3 +/- 2.1 years) participated in this study. At baseline patients perceived CGM as rather advantageous, but after RA and RTA the perceived benefits were reduced (baseline, 101.0 +/- 16.0; RA, 95.7 +/- 20.2; RTA, 93.6 +/- 22.8; P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between RA and RTA. Also, there was no significant effect on diabetes-related distress or state anxiety, but a positive effect on depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no specific, significant, negative or positive effect of RA versus RTA on satisfaction with CGM. Exposing patients with type 1 diabetes to their current glucose values does not seem to have a specific negative impact on the appraisal of CGM or more generic patient-reported outcomes.

Effect of experimentally induced hypoglycemia and different insulin levels on feelings of hunger in type 1 diabetic patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the impacts of experimentally induced hypoglycemia and different insulin infusion rates on feelings of hunger. METHODS: Blood glucose and insulin levels were manipulated by hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique. Participants were 16 patients with type 1 diabetes (age 36.2+/-11.7 yrs, diabetes duration 9.0+/-6.3 yrs, HbA1c 8.2+/-2.0%). One group (n=8) received moderate, constant insulin infusion (0.8 microU/kg/min), whereas the insulin infusion was doubled in the other group (1.6 microU/kg/min). Blood glucose was lowered stepwise from euglycemia (5.6 mmol/l) to moderate hypoglycemia (2.5 mmol/l). RESULTS: As expected, there was a significant effect of hypoglycemia on feelings of hunger (F (3, 42)=41.7, p<0.01). But during high insulin infusion, feelings of hunger were significantly less intense than during moderate insulin infusion (F (1, 14)=7.2, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Peripheral insulin levels seem to be associated with the intensity of feelings of hunger.

Pharmacodynamic effects of orally administered dexlipotam on endothelial function in type 2-diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic endotheliopathy is the result of hyperglycemia and the production of oxygen-free radicals. In vitro and in vivo data have shown beneficial effects of dexlipotam (DEX), a tromethamine salt of R(+)-alpha-lipoic acid, on oxidative stress in hyperglycemic states, but no data are available on the effects of this agent on endothelial function. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of DEX on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and to estimate the safety and tolerability of DEX. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DEX 960 mg and DEX 1,920 mg were investigated in DM2 patients over a period of 4 weeks using a randomized, placebo- (PLA) controlled, double-blinded study with 3 parallel groups. The marker of arterial function after 4-week therapy with DEX was the maximum percentage change versus baseline in the flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (FMD) after reperfusion. RESULTS: A total of 114 diabetic patients were randomized to the three study groups. DEX was safe and well tolerated. Dyspepsia appeared to be the most relevant side effect of DEX treatment. Systolic (p = 0.078) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.059) tended to be lower in patients treated with DEX at a dose of 1,920 mg. There were no significant differences in FMD between the placebo- and the DEX-treated groups. In patients with poorer glucose control (HbA1c > 6.5% Hb), FMD increased significantly after 4-week treatment with DEX: PLA -1.51 +/- 2.98%, DEX 960 mg +1.22 +/- 3.22, p = 0.027, DEX 1,920 mg +1.47 +/- 3.78, p= 0.012. The magnitude of the mean change compared to placebo was 2.73% (DEX 920) and 2.98% (DEX 1,920) in patients with HbAlc > 7.5% Hb (DEX 960, p = 0.007, DEX 1,920, p = 0.032). The effects of treatment were usually statistically significant in subgroups with more severe vascular stress (longer duration of disease, pretreatment history, higher LDL-C, higher blood pressure). CONCLUSION: DEX therapy appears to reduce endothelial dysfunction in DM2, especially in men with long history of DM2 and having poor glucose control. These findings will be useful in patient selection in future prospective clinical trials with drugs to treat vascular stress.

Association of glucose levels and glucose variability with mood in type 1 diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of glucose levels and variability of glucose, assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with mood in type 1 diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six type 1 diabetic patients (77.8% male, age: 31.1 +/- 10.0 years; disease duration: 14.7 +/- 7.1 years, BMI: 26.7 +/- 5.1 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.4 +/-1.8%, 27.8% with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] therapy) used a continuous glucose monitoring system for 48.8 h. During this time the patients rated their current mood states 14.6 times on average, using the University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology Mood Adjective Checklist and hand-held computers. RESULTS: Sensor performance was satisfactory, with a mean absolute difference from reference laboratory glucose measurement of 13.7%. Current glucose values were significantly associated with ratings of 'tension' (z = 2.40), 'hedonic tone' (z = -2.63) and 'energetic arousal' (z = -2.09). 'Anger' (z = 1.64) was not significantly associated with glucose values. The glucose AUC during the 60 min prior to the mood rating showed similar associations. The two parameters of glucose variability-coefficient of variation and absolute glucose change during the 60 min prior to the mood ratings-did not show any significant association with the mood ratings. The magnitude of association was significantly higher for glucose level than for glucose variability in the scales 'tension' and 'hedonic tone'. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: High glucose values had a negative impact on mood; positive mood ratings decreased, whereas negative mood ratings increased. The association between mood and glucose variability seemed to be less important than that between glucose level and mood.

Effects of self-management training in Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, prospective trial.

AIMS: The efficacy of three education programmes for Type 2 diabetic patients was tested in a randomized trial. A didactic-oriented training programme (treatment A) was compared with a self-management-oriented programme delivered in group sessions (treatment B). The latter programme was compared with a more individualized approach (treatment C). METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one Type 2 diabetic patients (age 55.6 +/- 6.3 years, diabetes duration 6.6 +/- 6.2 years, HbA(1c) 7.8 +/- 1.6%, female 49.7%) took part. Efficacy was assessed 3 months (t1) after baseline (t0) and at a follow-up 15 months (t2) after baseline. RESULTS: The fall in HbA(1c) in treatment B at t1 was sustained at t2 (t0 8.1 +/- 1.8%, t1 7.3 +/- 1.7%, t2 7.4 +/- 1.9%). In treatment A, HbA(1c) was unchanged throughout (t0 7.6 +/- 1.5%, t1 7.5 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.7 +/- 1.7%; treatment A vs. treatment B; P < 0.05). With the more individualized approach of treatment C, there was a fall in HbA(1c) at t1, but this was not sustained at t2 (t0 7.8 +/- 1.6%, t1 7.1 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.6 +/- 1.6%; treatment B vs. treatment C; P = 0.73). There were also significant benefits in treatment B subjects compared with treatment A in further medical (body mass index and fasting blood glucose), psychological (control, irritability and hunger dependency of eating behaviour, and trait anxiety) and behavioural (exercise) variables. There were no significant benefits of the more individualized treatment C compared with group treatment B. No significant differences were found regarding triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein, diabetes-related knowledge, negative well-being, urine or blood glucose levels or foot care. CONCLUSION: Self-management training had a significantly higher medium-term efficacy than didactic diabetes education. The group sessions were more effective than a more individualized approach.

Insulin glargine benefits patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic treatment: an observational study of everyday practice in 12,216 patients.

AIMS: This observational study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of adding insulin glargine (LANTUS((R))) to support oral antidiabetic (OAD) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in everyday practice. METHODS: A 9-month, open-label, multicentre, observational study, with an optional 20-month extension phase, in which add-on insulin glargine therapy was initiated in 12,216 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on OADs. The insulin glargine dose was adjusted at the physician's discretion, reflecting everyday practice. The main outcome measures were changes in HbA(1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin dose and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: At baseline, mean (+/- s.d.) age was 63.9 +/- 11.3 years; disease duration was >5 years in 47% of patients, 1-5 years in 39% of patients and <1 year in 10% of patients, while 4% of patients were newly diagnosed. Addition of insulin glargine to OAD therapy led to reductions in mean HbA(1c) (-1.5% from 8.7%) and FBG (-69 mg/dl from 202 mg/dl) levels after 3 months, which were maintained after 9 months [HbA(1c): -1.7%; FBG: -71 mg/dl (-3.9 mmol/l)] without an increase in BMI. Similar glycaemic control was observed after 20 months in the 2721 patients in the extension study. Adverse drug reactions were documented in 26 patients (0.2%). Of 47 adverse events documented, 19 were due to hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: In everyday practice, patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled on OADs benefit from add-on basal insulin treatment with insulin glargine as they demonstrate improved glycaemic control without weight gain.