Effects of SARPE and MISMARPE on correction of transverse maxillary deficiency: A preliminary comparative evaluation.

AIM: The present study was designed to compare, on cone-beam computed tomography imaging, the skeletal and dental effects of the SARPE (Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion) and MISMARPE (Minimally Invasive Surgical and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of adult patients with transverse maxillary deficiency (TMD) was divided into two groups, and scans were obtained preoperatively (T0) and immediately after completion of expansion (T1). The posterior and anterior linear transverse distances of the maxilla and the angulation of the maxillary first molars were evaluated. The data were entered into a generalized estimating equations model to verify the postoperative effects of the different techniques. RESULTS: None of the techniques caused any appreciable change in the angulation of the molars. The skeletal changes were similar, with significantly greater gains in the nasal fossa and intermaxillary distance when using the MISMARPE. CONCLUSION: The technique can be an effective and lower morbidity alternative to SARPE.

Le Fort I osteotomy and soft tissue response: A retrospective cohort study comparing three different techniques.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the nasolabial soft tissues effects in three different Le Fort I osteotomy techniques using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) volume surfaces. A retrospective study was designed, and three groups were evaluated: group 1, patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy; group 2, patients who underwent subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy; and group 3, patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy with ANS recontouring or removal. CBCT evaluation was performed at two time points: T0, 1 week before surgery; T1, 6 months after surgery. A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study (group 1: 30; group 2: 30; group 3: 30). Mean maxillary advancement was 4.26 mm. For group 1, mean change in inter-alar width was 2.29 ± 1.57 mm (minimum -2mm; maximum 6.1 mm; for group 2 it was 1.20 ± 1.56 mm (minimum -1.7 mm; maximum 5.9 mm), and for group 3 was 1.84 ± 1.76 mm (minimum -2.3 mm; maximum 5.9 mm). For group 1, mean change in alar base width was 1.69 ± 2.32 mm (minimum -4.8 mm; maximum 6,1 mm); in group 2 it was 0.85 ± 2.08 mm (minimum -4mm; maximum 6 mm), and group 3 was 1.21 ± 1.83 mm (minimum -2mm; maximum 5 mm). Results showed statistically significant differences in nasolabial area (P < 0.001). Within the limitations of the study it seems that subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy should be preferred when the priority is to avoid changes to the nasolabial region.