Late pseudocoarctation syndrome after stent-graft implantation for traumatic aortic rupture.

The present observation illustrates an unusual complication occurring after stent-grafting (S-graft) for aortic isthmus rupture. A 22-year-old patient, treated by S-graft in the emergency department for traumatic aortic rupture, was readmitted 10 months later with pseudocoarctation syndrome. A membrane was found inside the stent-graft that had induced a pseudo-dissection, which caused the pseudocoarctation syndrome. Surgical treatment consisted of removing the stent-graft and membrane and replacing it with a vascular implant. The patient's clinical course was fair. The suggested mechanism was circumferential neoendothelialization of the stent-graft. Dehiscence caused the superior part of the membrane to drop into the lumen of the stent-graft creating a "false channel" that compressed the "true lumen" and induced "pseudocoarctation" syndrome. The cause of the extensive neointimalization remains unexplained. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts require regular follow-up monitoring by angioscan or angio-magnetic resonance imaging.

CardioWest (Jarvik) total artificial heart: a single-center experience with 42 patients.

BACKGROUND: When implanted in patients with biventricular failure, the CardioWest total artificial heart has asserted itself over time as a reliable bridge-to-transplant device that as yet is used by only a few international teams. The aim of this single-center retrospective study is to assess both the comorbidity and survival of patients awaiting heart transplants while receiving circulatory support with a CardioWest total artificial heart. METHODS: From 1990 to December 2006, 42 patients received a CardioWest total artificial heart at our center. Mean age at the time of implantation was 45.7 +/- 9.5 years, and 40 patients (95%) were men. Idiopathic or dilated cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 45.2% (n = 19) of the patients and ischemic cardiomyopathy in 42.8% (n = 18). Average body surface area was 1.9 +/- 0.22 m(2). RESULTS: Duration of support was 1 to 292 days (mean, 101 +/- 86 days). Twelve patients died (28.5%) while receiving device support, and 30 patients (71.5%) underwent transplantation. Actuarial survival rates for the transplanted patients were 90% (n = 25), 81% (n = 14), and 76% (n = 10) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Causes of death during device support included multiorgan failure in 6 (50%), sepsis in 2, acute respiratory distress syndrome in 2, alveolar hemorrhage in 1, and other cause in 1. There were no device malfunctions that led to patient death. Adverse events included stroke in 3 patients (7%) and infections in 35 patients (85%) during support. CONCLUSIONS: The CardioWest total artificial heart is an excellent bridge-to-transplant device for patients with biventricular failure. Our study demonstrates excellent safety, reliability, and efficiency. Exceptional outcome after transplantation underlines its capacity to aid in end-organ recovery.

Outcome of heart transplants 15 to 20 years ago: graft survival, post-transplant morbidity, and risk factors for mortality.

OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to determine the long-term outcome of patients who underwent heart transplantation 15 to 20 years ago, in the cyclosporine era, and identify risk factors for death. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of 148 patients who had undergone heart transplantation between 1985 and 1991 at a single center. Operative technique and immunosuppressive treatment were comparable in all patients. RESULTS: Actuarial survival rates were 75% (n = 111), 58% (n = 86), and 42% (n = 62) at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 12.1 +/- 5.6 years for patients who survived more than 3 months after transplantation (n = 131). The major causes of death were malignancy (35.8%) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (24.7%). No death related to acute rejection was reported after the first month of transplantation. Graft coronary artery disease was detected on angiography in 66 (50.3%), and 7 (5.3%) had retransplantation. Malignancies developed in 131 patients (48.1%), including skin cancers in 31 (23.6%), solid tumors in 26 (19.8%), and hematologic malignancies in 14 (10.6%). Severe renal function requiring dialysis or renal transplantation developed in 27 patients (20.6%). By multivariable analysis, the only pre-transplant risk factor found to affect long-term survival was a history of cigarette use (p < 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival at 15 years after cardiac transplantation remains excellent in the cyclosporine era. Controlling acute allograft rejection can be achieved but seems to carry a high rate of cancers and renal dysfunction. History of cigarette use affects significantly long-term survival in our study.

Direct stenting limits sirolimus-eluting stent edge neointimal thickening.

OBJECTIVE: The use of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) has strongly limited the incidence of in-stent restenosis that still remains a problem at the stent edge. The aim of this study was to analyze the neointimal thickening after implantation of SES and to assess the influence of the stent implantation procedure on the neointimal thickening in the in-stent segment and at the edge of the stent in an ex-vivo model of stented human artery. METHODS: Both balloon expandable SES and the corresponding bare metal stent (BMS) were used in a model of human mammary artery culture. Stents were implanted either directly or after predilatation (10 atm, 60 seconds) and analysis of arterial segments were performed at 28 days poststenting. Cell proliferation and neointimal thickening were assessed by immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and histomorphometry, both in the in-stent segment and at the edge of the stent. Neointimal thickening was expressed as the ratio ([neointimal area/neointimal area + media area]). RESULTS: The in-stent neointimal thickening was dramatically inhibited in the SES group compared with the BMS group whatever the stenting technique was (predilatation: 0.22 +/- 0.05 vs 0.30 +/- 0.10; P < .04; direct stenting 0.16 +/- 0.04 vs 0.30 +/- 0.13; P <.01). This effect of SES was associated with a smallest expression of the small G protein RhoA and an increase of p27kip expression. In the BMS group, predilatation and direct stenting gave similar in-stent neointimal thickening. In contrast, in the SES group, in-stent neointimal thickening was significantly reduced when direct stenting was performed (0.16 +/- 0.04 [direct stenting] vs 0.22 +/- 0.05 [predilatation], P < .03). At the stent edge, a similar neointimal thickening was observed with both type of stent when predilatation was performed on the entire segment of the artery. Direct stenting significantly reduced the neointimal thickness at the stent edge when SES where used (0.06 +/- 0.01 [direct stenting] vs 0.19 +/- 0.06 [predilatation]; P < .001) but not in the BMS group. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficiency of sirolimus released form SES to inhibit RhoA expression and to increase p27kip level in the arterial wall and show the benefit of direct stenting to limit the edge effect with SES.

Does the pretransplant UNOS status modify the short- and long-term cardiac transplant prognosis?

BACKGROUND: We compared the morbidity and mortality rates of patients who had urgent heart transplantation or transplantation after bridging with a ventricular assist device, with the rates of patients whose clinical stability allowed them to wait at home. METHODS: From March 1985 to December 2000, 404 patients underwent heart transplantation in a single center. There were 273 patients with UNOS status 2 (US 2), 103 patients with UNOS Status 1A (US 1A), and 28 patients with UNOS Status 1B (US 1B). We compared the groups retrospectively with respect to pretransplantation status and operative results. RESULTS: Despite more severely impaired hemodynamics and a significantly higher preoperative infection rate in US 1A and 1B patients, there were no statistically significant differences in survival rates among the three groups. Donor sex and age, cytomegalovirus and toxoplasmosis, mismatch rate, ischemic time, method of myocardial protection, and operative technique did not differ statistically among the three groups. Length of intensive care unit stay, postoperative morbidity, first year postoperative rejection rate, and graft occlusive vascular disease rate were statistically similar among the three groups. Although pretransplantation cancer assessment was less complete in US 1A and 1B than in US 2 patients, the late-cancer rate was not statistically different among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that urgently transplanted patients have both early and long term morbidity and mortality similar to those of patients waiting for transplantation at home or with a ventricular assist device.