Selecting a Bedside Cognitive Vital Sign to Monitor Cognition in Hospital: Feasibility, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Logical Memory.

Although there is a high prevalence of delirium and cognitive impairment among hospitalised older adults, short, reliable cognitive measures are rarely used to monitor cognition and potentially alert healthcare professionals to early changes that might signal delirium. We evaluated the reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of logical memory (LM), immediate verbal recall of a short story, compared to brief tests of attention as a bedside "cognitive vital sign" (CVS). Trained nursing staff performed twice-daily cognitive assessments on 84 clinically stable inpatients in two geriatric units over 3-5 consecutive days using LM and short tests of attention and orientation including months of the year backwards. Scores were compared to those of an expert rater. Inter-rater reliability was excellent with correlation coefficients for LM increasing from r = 0.87 on day 1 to r = 0.97 by day 4 (p < 0.0001). A diurnal fluctuation of two points from a total of 30 was deemed acceptable in clinically stable patients. LM scores were statistically similar (p = 0.98) with repeated testing (suggesting no learning effect). All nurses reported that LM was feasible to score routinely. LM is a reliable measure of cognition showing diurnal variation but minimal learning effects. Further study is required to define the properties of an ideal CVS test, though LM may satisfy these.

Quantifying the intraindividual variation of antimüllerian hormone in the ovarian cycle.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify intraindividual variability of antimüllerian hormone (AMH) as analytical and biological coefficients of variation and assess the effects of variation on clinical classification. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Thirty-eight women referred by general practitioners. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Total intraindividual variability (CVW), analytical (CVA) and biological variability (CVI) for each woman and for AMH ranges: low (<5 pmol/L), reduced (5-10), moderate (>10-30) and high (>30 pmol/L), with calculation of proportion of women crossing clinical cutoffs and expected variability around each cutoff. RESULT(S): Cycling women (n = 38) contributed 238 blood samples (average 6 samples each). The average total intraindividual AMH variability was 20% (range: 2.1% to 73%). Biological variation was 19% (range: 0 to 71%) and at least twice the analytical variation of 6.9% (range: 4.5% to 16%). Reclassification rates were highest in women with low (33%) or reduced AMH (67%) levels. Expected variations around the 5, 10, and 30 pmol/L cutoffs were 3-7, 7-13, and 20-40 pmol/L, respectively. In a woman with mean AMH in the 10-30 pmol/L range, the span of results that could occur was 7-40 pmol/L. CONCLUSION(S): Total variation in AMH was 20%, and the majority of this was biological. Changes in AMH resulted in reclassification in 29% of women and occurred most frequently in those with low and reduced AMH. In cycling women, the variability in AMH should be considered by clinicians, especially if a result is close to a clinical cutoff.