New insights into the structure of membrane fouling by biomolecules using comparison with isotherms and ATR-FTIR local quantification.

The objective of this paper was to propose a deepened analyze of a microfiltration membrane fouling by two biomolecules: a protein (Bovine Serum Albumin) and a peptide (Glutathione). In addition to an analysis of flux decline, the mass of biomolecules accumulated on the membrane during filtration was quantified and compared to adsorption experiments, using Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflection mode (ATR-FTIR). It was demonstrated that the same quantity of accumulated biomolecules on the apparent membrane area can generate totally different flux declines because of different fouling mechanisms. On the one hand, Glutathione can adsorb in the whole porous media of the membrane, penetrating through the pores, modifying the hydrophilicity at low concentrations and generating pore constriction at high concentrations. On the other hand, BSA organize a dense irreversible fouling in the first minutes of filtration containing a quantity equivalent to more than 45 monolayers, leading to pore blocking and pore constriction. This structure is resistant to rinsing and NaOH cleaning. Then a reversible fouling, containing a quantity equivalent to more than 90 monolayers is settled. The above structure can be removed with an intensive water rinsing and corresponds to a rather porous cake leading to a low resistance to water permeation, whereas the intermediate structure can only be removed with chemical cleaning and has a higher impact on water permeation. The original approach detailed in this paper allowed to go deeper in the understanding of the membrane fouling by soft matter, not detailed in previous papers.

Effects of Lubiprostone, an Intestinal Secretagogue, on Electrolyte Homeostasis in Chronic Idiopathic and Opioid-induced Constipation.

GOALS: To assess short-term and long-term effects of lubiprostone, a type-2 chloride channel activator, on electrolyte homeostasis. BACKGROUND: Conventional laxatives are associated with electrolyte imbalances. Lubiprostone is a type-2 chloride channel activator approved for treating chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC), opioid-induced constipation (OIC), and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in women. It induces intestinal fluid secretion, possibly affecting water and electrolyte homeostasis. We investigated short-term and long-term effects of lubiprostone on electrolyte, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine levels using pooled data from CIC and OIC patients. STUDY: Data were pooled from 10 CIC and OIC studies-6 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies and 4 open-label, long-term studies. Total duration of lubiprostone exposure was from 3 weeks (short-term: CIC, 3 to 4 wk; OIC, placebo-controlled, 12 wk) to 48 weeks (long-term: CIC, 24 to 48 wk; OIC, 48 wk). Sodium, chloride, potassium, magnesium, BUN, and creatinine levels were examined at baseline and final assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 3209 patients were assessed. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, there were no clinically meaningful differences in levels of electrolytes, BUN, and creatinine between lubiprostone and placebo groups, and in changes from baseline levels with long-term use of lubiprostone. Analyses of shifts in laboratory values (low/normal/high) at baseline and final assessment showed minimal effects on electrolytes, BUN, and creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone did not cause clinically meaningful electrolyte imbalances or affect markers of renal function in either the short-term or long-term treatment of CIC or OIC.

Analysis of Nausea in Clinical Studies of Lubiprostone for the Treatment of Constipation Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Lubiprostone is a ClC-2 chloride channel activator approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in women. Lubiprostone is generally well tolerated, with nausea being the most common adverse event. AIMS: To characterize nausea with lubiprostone using pooled results from clinical studies in patients with CIC, OIC, or IBS-C. METHODS: Data from three 3- and 4-week placebo-controlled studies and three long-term open-label studies were pooled for the CIC analysis. The OIC and IBS-C analyses each used pooled data from three 12-week placebo-controlled studies and one 36-week open-label extension study. RESULTS: The populations included the following numbers of patients: CIC, 316 (placebo) and 1113 (lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily [BID]); OIC, 652 (placebo) and 889 (lubiprostone 24 mcg BID); and IBS-C, 435 (placebo) and 1011 (lubiprostone 8 mcg BID). The incidence of nausea in lubiprostone-treated patients ranged from 11.4 to 31.1%, with the highest incidence in patients with CIC. Among patients with any nausea, most reported only mild or moderate severity (96.5-99.1% across indications) and only one event (83.6-88.7%); most events occurred within the first 5 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nausea was the most common adverse event following the treatment with lubiprostone. Event rates varied by indication and dose, and the majority of nausea adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Nausea events predominantly occurred early in the treatment period in all of the pooled study populations.

Pharmacokinetics of 2 dapivirine vaginal microbicide gels and their safety vs. Hydroxyethyl cellulose-based universal placebo gel.

Dapivirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is in development as a microbicide for the protection of women against HIV infection. A randomized, double-blind, phase 1 trial was conducted in 36 healthy HIV-negative women to compare the pharmacokinetics of 2 dapivirine vaginal gel formulations (0.05% each) and their safety with the hydroxyethyl cellulose-based universal placebo gel. Gel was self-administered once daily for a total of 11 days. Blood and vaginal fluid samples were collected sequentially over 24 days for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was evaluated by pelvic examination, colposcopy, adverse events, and clinical laboratory assessments. Adverse event profiles were similar for the 3 gels. Most events were mild and not related to study gel. Headache and vaginal hemorrhage (any vaginal bleeding) were most common. Plasma concentrations of dapivirine did not exceed 1.1 ng/mL. Steady-state conditions were reached within approximately 10 days. Dapivirine concentrations in vaginal fluids were slightly higher for Gel 4789, but Cmax values on days 1 and 14 were not significantly different. Terminal half-life was 72-73 hours in plasma and 15-17 hours in vaginal fluids. Both formulations of dapivirine gel were safe and well tolerated. Dapivirine was delivered to the lower genital tract at concentrations at least 5 logs greater than in vitro inhibitory concentrations.