ABSTRACT
Hair analysis of drugs of abuse has been a subject of interest from a clinical, social and forensic perspective for years because of the broad time detection window after intake in comparison to urine or blood. However, the correct and reliable interpretation of opiates findings in an authentic hair sample requires optimalisation and standardisation of decontamination and incubation procedures. Comparing various published methods, we have found some variability in them and no unequivocal recommended procedure for starting with a method directly. Therefore, various combinations of solvents, of various polarity, as washing solvents were tested for removing opiates from the external surface of real hair samples. The yields of opiates from these washings were compared with the yields from the interior of the hair matrix after digestion with various procedures. The opiates after digestion were cleaned up from resulting solution on extraction columns with mixed solid-phase and analysed by GC-MS in standard EI mode after silylation. The efficiencies of neutral (Söerensen buffer, pH 7.4), acid (0.1 M HCl) and basic (1 M NaOH) digestion of the hair matrix were evaluated and the relative recoveries for morphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine and hydrocodone were compared. As it is very problematic to imitate the reference hair sample with a specific amount of analytes incorporated inside, which can be used for calibration to get a close estimate of the quantities of analytes inside the solid authentic sample, the total digestion of a hair sample in basic medium was considered to be a very important reference basis for quantitative determinations. The ratios of hydrolysis of labile 6-acetylmorphine or acetylcodeine were tested and evaluated in practical routine conditions of acid or neutral digestion of hair. Comparing the three methods of incubation of authentic hair samples, the methods using 1 M NaOH or 0.1 M HCl yielded higher recoveries of total equivalents of morphine or codeine, whereas the incubation in Söerensen buffer allowed the reflection of real ratios of labile metabolites and/or parent compounds in an original sample. This method has been shown to be capable of detecting hydrocodone in hair with other opiates concomitantly and to indicate the drug abuse pattern of a person at various time intervals in the past.
Subject(s)
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Hair/chemistry , Narcotics/analysis , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
Urinary metabolic pattern after the therapeutic peroral dose of dihydrocodeine tartrate to six human volunteers has been explored. Using the GC-MS analytical method, we have found that the major part of the dose administered is eliminated via urine within the first 24 h. However, the analytical monitoring of dihydrocodeine and its metabolites in urine was still possible 72 h after the dose was administered. The dihydrocodeine equivalent amounts excreted in urine in 72 h ranged between 32 and 108% of the dose, on average 62% in all individuals. The major metabolite excreted into urine was a 6-conjugate of dihydrocodeine, then in a lesser amount a 6-conjugate of nordihydrocodeine (both conjugated to approximately 65%). The O-demethylated metabolite dihydromorphine was of a minor amount and was 3,6-conjugated in 85%. Traces of nordihydromorphine and hydrocodone were confirmed as other metabolites of dihydrocodeine in our study. This information can be useful in interpretation of toxicological findings in forensic practice.
Subject(s)
Codeine/analogs & derivatives , Codeine/urine , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Humans , Reference Standards , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
A GC-MS method suitable to conduct practical trace toxicological analyses of various opiates including hydrocodone or hydromorphone is presented both in scan and selected ion monitoring modes. Silylation can be a convenient reaction to derivatize unknown analytes in toxicological samples. However, silylation of drugs with tautomeric keto/enol groups in molecular structure can cause analytical problems due to poor reproducibility of conversion degree. After using N-Methyl-N-trimethyl-silyltrifluoracetamide (MSTFA) acceptable results were achieved.
