Simple actions to support breastfeeding can avoid unwanted weaning in infants younger than 6 months hospitalized for bronchiolitis: A before/after study (Bronchilact II).

BACKGROUND: Admission to hospital with bronchiolitis may adversely affect breastfeeding. Correct advice and support have been pointed out as a determining factor. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a telephone survey to evaluate a set of actions to promote breastfeeding during hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis. METHODS: Population: All patients 6 months of age or younger hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis and receiving at least partial breastfeeding were eligible for the study. Patients discharged home whose parents accepted to be contacted by phone were also included. INTERVENTION: We established a set of actions to promote breastfeeding (posters, flyers, staff training, and equipment) in all pediatric wards attending to these patients. COMPARISON: This was a cross-sectional study conducted during two epidemic seasons of bronchiolitis in a tertiary care hospital. Data on continued breastfeeding at 3 months (0.5-6; median, range) postdischarge were collected by telephone and compared with the same set of data collected from patients with bronchiolitis in the same setting the year before the intervention. OUTCOME: We conducted a telephone survey to evaluate whether some actions regarding breastfeeding might diminish the risk of unwanted weaning during hospitalization for bronchiolitis. The primary outcome was the proportion of stopped or reduced breastfeeding at discharge. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether there were factors associated with breastfeeding modification. RESULTS: The results of the evaluation before intervention (phase 1) are published by Heilbronner et al. In Phase 1 of our study, 84 patients were included and 43 mothers (51%) reported that breastfeeding was modified by hospitalization of their child: 20.4% stopped, 14% switched to partial breastfeeding, and 16.6% reduced breastfeeding. These mothers stated that causes of breastfeeding disturbances were lack of support and advice (63%), followed by severity of the child's respiratory disease (32%), logistical hospital difficulties (30%), and personal organizational issues (9.3%). The intervention took place in September. After the intervention, 50 patients could be included in the study between October 1and December 31, 2016. Among them, 40 (80%) mothers kept breastfeeding as before, four (8%) stopped, four (8%) switched to partial breastfeeding, and two (4%) reduced breastfeeding without stopping. Bronchiolitis was more severe among patients with altered breastfeeding in terms of ventilatory support. CONCLUSION: Bronchiolitis is a high-risk event for breastfeeding disruption but interventions to promote breastfeeding might help to prevent the risk of unwanted weaning. More severe bronchiolitis probably poses the highest risk of weaning and the need for supplementary nutrition.

Recent actuality about Bacillus cereus and human milk bank: a new sensitive method for microbiological analysis of pasteurized milk.

Three cases of Bacillus cereus infection or colonization occurred in the same region in France, and milk from the milk bank was suspected as a possible common source of contamination. All Batches delivered to the three cases complied with the requirements of the bacteriological reference method recommended by good practices guidelines. Still, a retrospective analysis with a more sensitive method showed one batch to contain B. cereus, however straincomparison revealed no epidemiological link betweenisolates from patients and those from the milk. Consequently, in accordance with the precautionary principle, we developed a new sensitive method for the screening of pasteurized milk for pathogenic bacteria. From January 1 to August 31, 2017, 2526 samples of pasteurized milk were prospectively included in the study. We showed that a 20 mL sample of pasteurized milk incubated for 18 h at 37 °C under aerobic conditions was favoring the detection of B. Cereus. The nonconformity rate was 6.3% for the reference method and 12.6% for the improved method (p < 0.0001). Nonconformity was due to the presence of B. cereus in 88.5% of cases for the improved method and 53% of cases for the reference method (p < 0.0001). Thus our new method is improves the microbiological safety of the product distributed and only moderately increases the rate of bacteriological nonconformity .