Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 65
Filter
1.
Cancer Nurs ; 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To advance oncology nursing science and clinical practice, researchers and clinicians must understand the important real-world concerns of nurses who provide direct care to people with cancer or manage processes that support patient care. OBJECTIVE: This study developed a comprehensive compendium of real-world concerns among oncology nurses and built consensus regarding their importance. METHODS: Using Delphi survey methodology, this prospective, descriptive study was performed in 3 phases: (1) identification of experts, defined as registered nurses (RNs) employed within a comprehensive cancer center; (2) qualitative content analysis of 353 responses from 267 RNs who responded to the question, "What do you see as nursing research concerns, problems, and/or issues on your unit or in your work environment that needs to be studied?"; and (3) rating the importance of 62 research themes identified from the qualitative content analysis (n = 247 RNs). RESULTS: The top research priority was patient safety followed by patient education, oncologic emergencies, patient expectations and adherence with care, team communication, patient psychosocial needs, patient-reported outcomes and quality of life, healthcare team burnout, workload, and nurse burnout. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the nursing discipline's fundamental focus on patient safety, the top-rated nursing research priority, along with other patient-related and work environment issues. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nursing is complex and complicated. This study identified and prioritized the real-world concerns, issues, and problems of oncology RNs who provide direct care or manage the processes that support care, supporting the need to focus on patient-related and work environment research.

2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302597, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722888

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, has significantly impacted the psychological and physical health of a wide range of individuals, including healthcare professionals (HCPs). This umbrella review aims provide a quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have investigated the prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reviews was conducted. The search was performed using the EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases from 01st January 2020 to 15th January 2024. A random-effects model was then used to estimate prevalence with a 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses were then conducted to explore the heterogeneity of the sample. Seventy-two meta-analyses involved 2,308 primary studies were included after a full-text review. The umbrella review revealed that the pooled prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic was 37% (95% CI 32.87-41.22), 31.8% (95% CI 29.2-34.61) 29.4% (95% CI 27.13-31.84) 36.9% (95% CI 33.78-40.05) respectively. In subgroup analyses the prevalence of anxiety and depression was higher among nurses than among physicians. Evidence from this umbrella review suggested that a significant proportion of HCPs experienced stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance during the COVID-19 pandemic. This information will support authorities when implementing specific interventions that address mental health problems among HCPs during future pandemics or any other health crises. Such interventions may include the provision of mental health support services, such as counseling and peer support programs, as well as the implementation of organizational strategies to reduce workplace stressors.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Health Personnel , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Pandemics , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Meta-Analysis as Topic
5.
Nurs Outlook ; 71(6): 102050, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Home health care (HHC) patients with diabetes are at high risk for inpatient admissions. PURPOSE: To identify variables associated with inpatient admissions among adults age ≥50 with diabetes receiving HHC in the community and in assisted living (AL). METHODS: Retrospective HHC data (collected October 2021 to March 2022 in the Southern United States) from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set D were analyzed with logistic regression (n = 5,308 patients). DISCUSSION: The inpatient admission rate was 29.5%. For community-dwelling patients, multiple hospitalizations, depression, limited cognitive function, decreased activities of daily living (ADL) performance, and unhealed pressure ulcer or injury ≥stage 2 were significantly associated with inpatient admission. For those in AL, multiple prior hospitalizations and decreased ability to perform ADLs were associated with inpatient admission. CONCLUSION: Understanding risk factors for inpatient admissions among patients with diabetes can support the identification of at-risk patients and inform interventions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Home Care Services , Adult , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Activities of Daily Living , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Risk Factors , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy
7.
Heart Lung ; 61: 84-91, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37187106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Precautions to mitigate spread of COVID-19 such as the closing of exercise facilities impacted physical activity behaviors. Varied risks for severe COVID-19 may have influenced participation in regular physical activity to maintain precautions. OBJECTIVE: Describe differences in the amount and intensity of physical activity between adults at high versus low risk for severe COVID-19 illness during the pandemic. We hypothesized that over 13 months, 1) high-risk adults would have greater odds of inactivity than low-risk adults, and 2) when active, high-risk adults would have lower metabolic equivalent of task minutes (MET-min) than low-risk adults. METHODS: This longitudinal observational cohort study surveyed U.S. adults' demographics, health history, and physical activity beginning March 2020 using REDCap. Using self-report, health history was assessed with a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index and physical activity with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Repeated physical activity measurements were conducted in June, July, October, and December of 2020, and in April of 2021. Two models, a logistic model evaluating physical inactivity (hypothesis 1) and a gamma model evaluating total MET-min for physically active individuals (hypothesis 2), were used. Models were controlled for age, gender, and race. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 640 participants (mean age 42.7 ± 15.7, 78% women, 90% white), with n = 175 categorized as high-risk and n = 465 as low-risk. The odds of inactivity for the high-risk adults were 2.8 to 4.1 times as high than for low-risk adults at baseline and 13 months. Active high-risk adults had lower MET-min levels than low-risk adults in March (28%, p = 0.001), June (29%, p = 0.002), and July of 2020 (30%, p = 0.005) only. CONCLUSIONS: Adults at high risk of severe COVID-19 illness were disproportionately more likely to be physically inactive and exhibit lower MET-min levels than adults at low risk during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Exercise , Cohort Studies , Longitudinal Studies
8.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 29(10): 632.e1-632.e10, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137442

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is increasingly offered to older adults with hematologic malignancies, even though nonrelapse mortality remains a major concern in older patients owing to more comorbidities and greater frailty compared with their younger counterparts. The importance of patient fitness, a well-matched donor, and disease control to the success of allogeneic HCT have been well documented; however, these factors fail to account for the impact of the complex transplantation ecosystem (TE) that older adult HCT candidates must navigate. We propose a definition of the TE modeled after the social determinants of health. Furthermore, we outline a research agenda aimed at increasing understanding of the roles of individual social determinants of transplantation health in the larger ecosystem and how they may benefit or harm older adult HCT candidates. Herein we define the TE and its individual tenets, the social determinants of transplantation health. We review the available literature while incorporating the expertise of the membership of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Special Interest Group for Aging. The membership of the ASTCT Special Interest Group for Aging identify knowledge gaps and strategies to address them for each of the described social determinants of transplantation health. The ecosystem is an essential but underappreciated pillar for transplant access and success. We put forth this novel research agenda seeking to gain a better understanding of the complexity of HCT in older adults and develop strategies to improve access to HCT, survival, and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Aged , Quality of Life , Ecosystem , Transplantation, Homologous , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy
10.
West J Nurs Res ; 45(1): 34-45, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148648

ABSTRACT

This study reports the development and psychometric testing of the Kidney Transplant Self-Management Scale (KT-SMS). The instrument development phase included the following: (a) conceptual definition, item generation, and framework; (b) face validity assessment; and (c) content validity assessment. The psychometric testing phase included the following: (a) construct validity testing; (b) internal consistency reliability testing; (c) convergent validity testing; and (d) predictive power of the KT-SMS using a cross-sectional sample of kidney transplant recipients (N = 153). Factor analysis results supported the 16-item KT-SMS as multidimensional with five domains (medication adherence, cardiovascular risk reduction, protecting kidney, ownership, and skin cancer prevention). Internal consistency reliability for the total scale and five subscales was adequate. Convergent validity was supported as the intercorrelations of the KT-SMS total score with the five subscales were significant. The KT-SMS total score and five subscales were significantly correlated with self-efficacy for managing chronic disease, patient activation, and health-related quality of life.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Self-Management , Humans , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies
11.
West J Nurs Res ; 44(12): 1193-1194, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36226655
12.
West J Nurs Res ; 44(10): 987-988, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112786
13.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 103(9): 1807-1826, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35104445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions targeting optimal physical or cognitive function in adults with a history of cancer and describe the breadth of evidence as well as strengths and limitations across a range of functional domains. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The time scope was January 2008 to April 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective, controlled trials including single- and multiarm cohorts investigating rehabilitative interventions for cancer survivors at any point in the continuum of care were included, if studies included a primary functional outcome measure. Secondary data analyses and pilot/feasibility studies were excluded. Full-text review identified 362 studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction was performed by coauthor teams and quality and bias assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Scheme (class I-IV). DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies for which the functional primary endpoint achieved significance were categorized into 9 functional areas foundational to cancer rehabilitation: (1) quality of life (109 studies), (2) activities of daily living (61 studies), (3) fatigue (59 studies), (4) functional mobility (55 studies), (5) exercise behavior (37 studies), (6) cognition (20 studies), (7) communication (10 studies), (8) sexual function (6 studies), and (9) return to work (5 studies). Most studies were categorized as class III in quality/bias. Averaging results found within each of the functional domains, 71% of studies reported statistically significant results after cancer rehabilitation intervention(s) for at least 1 functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence supporting the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for individuals with a cancer history. The findings should be balanced with the understanding that many studies had moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in study quality by AAN criteria. These results may provide a foundation for future work to establish clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative interventions across cancer disease types.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Exercise , Fatigue , Humans , Prospective Studies
14.
Cancer Nurs ; 45(3): 211-223, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Finding effective ways to increase physical activity immediately following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is challenging. OBJECTIVE: This pilot randomized clinical trial tested the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effects of a free-living physical activity intervention (STEPS) compared with usual care (UC) on physical activity, fatigue, muscle strength, functional ability, sleep, and quality of life following treatment for MM with HCT. METHODS: Using a 2-group pretest/posttest design (N = 32), this study compared the 6-week STEPS intervention to UC. Data were collected using self-report questionnaires, functional performance tests, and wrist actigraphy before HCT and 7 weeks following hospital discharge. RESULTS: The STEPS group achieved their physical activity goals on 53% of intervention days. The STEPS group experienced greater appetite loss, more diarrhea, and slept more than UC regardless of time point. Both groups reported improvements in mental fatigue, emotional functioning, pain, sleep disturbance, anger, anxiety, and depression but climbed stairs slower and had weaker hand grips after intervention. Both groups subjectively reported fewer sleep disturbances but objectively experienced more wakefulness after sleep onset and an increased number of awakenings postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: The STEPS intervention is acceptable and feasible for people with MM treated with HCT. Both groups reported some improved symptoms but experienced some declines in physical performance postintervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurses strive to optimize health and promote well-being. Helping people increase their physical activity after treatment for MM with HCT may improve symptoms, but additional studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Sleep Wake Disorders , Exercise , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Muscle Strength , Quality of Life
15.
J Prof Nurs ; 37(6): 1167-1174, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High rates of mental health conditions and poor healthy lifestyle behaviors are reported in nurses, other clinicians, and health science students but have not been compared across different professions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) describe rates of mental health problems and healthy lifestyle behaviors across the Big 10 health professional faculty and students, (2) compare the health and healthy lifestyle behaviors of the Big 10 health sciences faculty and students across health sciences' professions, and (3) identify factors predictive of depression, stress, and anxiety. METHODS: Faculty and students from eight health science colleges at the Big 10 Universities responded to the study survey, which included: demographics, healthy lifestyle behavior questions, and three valid/reliable mental health scales. Descriptive statistics described the findings and multiple linear regression identified factors associated with mental health conditions. RESULTS: Eight-hundred and sixty-nine faculty and 1087 students responded. Approximately 50% of faculty and students reported 7 h of sleep/night, a third achieved 150 min of physical activity/week; 5.5%-9.9% screened positive for depression; and 11.5%-25.5% had anxiety. Age, sleep, and physical activity were associated with lower depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: University leadership must build wellness cultures that make healthy lifestyle behaviors easy to engage in and enhance mental well-being.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Universities , Faculty , Healthy Lifestyle , Humans , Students , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(5): 755-766, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33894985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Associations among illness perceptions of viruses, anxiety and depression symptoms, and self-management decisions, such as mask-wearing, are critical to informing public health practices to mitigate the short- and long-term consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 viral pandemic. PURPOSE: Guided by the common-sense model of self-regulation, this observational study examined associations among illness perceptions of COVID-19, anxiety, and depression symptoms among community-dwelling adults. METHOD: Data were collected from 1380 adults living in the United States early in the pandemic (03-23-2020 to 06-02-2020). Participants completed online surveys. Analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics and correlations. FINDINGS: While increased anxiety symptoms were associated with less perceived personal control, greater concern, and higher emotional responsiveness, increased depression symptoms were related to lower concern as well as greater emotional responsiveness and perceived consequences of the pandemic. DISCUSSION: Associations among illness perceptions, anxiety, and depression symptoms may impact viral spread mitigation behavior adoption.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Risk Reduction Behavior , Social Perception/psychology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Independent Living , Middle Aged , Self-Control/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young Adult
17.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 27(7): 617.e1-617.e7, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836312

ABSTRACT

Despite continuing increases in the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in older adults, no standardized geriatric assessment (GA) has been established to risk stratify for transplantation-related morbidity. We conducted a survey of transplant physicians to determine perceptions of the impact of older age (≥60 years) on alloHCT candidacy, and utilization of tools to gauge candidacy. This 23-item online cross-sectional survey was distributed to HCT physicians caring for adults in the United States between May and July 2019. Of the 770 invited HCT physicians, 175 (22.7%) completed the survey. The majority of respondents were age 41 to 60 years and male and practiced in a higher-volume teaching hospital. When considering regimen intensity, 29 physicians (17%) stated they would consider a myeloablative regimen for patients age ≥70 years, and 141 (82%) would consider reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients age ≥70 years. Almost all (90%) endorsed the need for a specialized assessment of pre-HCT vulnerabilities to guide candidacy decisions for older adults. Most physicians reported that their centers rarely (33%) or never (46%) use a dedicated geriatrician/geriatric-oncologist to assess alloHCT candidates age ≥60 years. Common barriers to performing a GA included uncertainty about which tools to use, lack of knowledge and training, and lack of appropriate clinical support staff. Many alloHCT physicians will consider alloHCT in patients up to age 75 years and not uncommonly in patients older than that. However, the application of tools and domains to assess candidacy in older adults varies widely. Incorporation of a standardized pretransplantation health assessment tool for risk stratification is a significant unmet need.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Physicians , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Transplantation, Homologous , United States
18.
Cancer Nurs ; 44(5): 378-387, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fatigue and sleep disturbance are 2 of the most common and distressing cancer symptoms that negatively affect quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of, and factors contributing to, fatigue and sleep disturbance in Arabic-speaking cancer patients in Oman after completion of their cancer treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional and descriptive correlational design was used. Data were collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index where a score of >5 indicated as poorer sleep, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue a score of ≤34 indicating clinically significant fatigue, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. RESULTS: Of the 369 patients who participated, 77.5% (n = 286) reported clinically significant fatigue, and 78% (n = 288) reported poor sleep. Fatigue (P < .05) was significantly associated with age, cancer site, months since diagnosis, type of treatment received, and comorbidity. Those experiencing fatigue and poor sleep had the lowest quality of life among the cancer patients studied. CONCLUSION: Fatigue and sleep disturbance are significant problems for the Arabic patients diagnosed with cancer. Both fatigue and sleep disturbance should be routinely assessed in the case of such patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Routine assessments of fatigue and sleep disturbance are recommended so that appropriate interventions and treatment management plans can be introduced to reduce fatigue and improve sleep quality among patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Sleep Wake Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology
20.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 20(2): e125-e137, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32655904

ABSTRACT

This review aimed to explore the psychometric properties of quality of life (QOL) scales to identify appropriate tools for research and clinical practice in Arabic-speaking adults. A systematic search of the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature® (EBSCO Information Services, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), MEDLINE® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and PsycINFO (American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia, USA) databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality assessment criteria were then utilised to evaluate the psychometric properties of identified QOL scales. A total of 27 studies relating to seven QOL scales were found. While these studies provided sufficient information regarding the scales' validity and reliability, not all reported translation and cross-cultural adaptation processes. Researchers and clinicians should consider whether the psychometric properties, subscales and characteristics of their chosen QOL scale are suitable for use in their population of interest.


Subject(s)
Psychometrics/standards , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Culturally Competent Care/methods , Culturally Competent Care/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...