Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Patol ; 54(1): 17-21, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455689

ABSTRACT

Mesenteric arteriovenous vasculopathy (MAVD/V) is an extremely rare and poorly understood disease and its incidence is probably underestimated. It is an uncommon, non-inflammatory and non-atherosclerotic form of mesenteric vascular injury, first reported in 2016, with characteristic histopathologic evidence of fibromuscular dysplasia-like vascular changes. We present the case of a chronically ill 84-year-old female with a 5 year history of recurrent small bowel obstruction, who underwent segmental resection of the small bowel. Intraoperative examination showed bowel stricture with fibrosis, intraluminal pill fragments and creeping mesenteric adipose tissue clinically compatible with Crohn's disease. Histological examination showed acute and chronic mucosal injury characterized by crypt distortion, ulcerations with granulation tissue, pseudo-pyloric metaplasia, areas of fibrosis and serosal adhesions. Multiple blood vessels (including both veins and arteries) demonstrated wall hyalinization, elastic degeneration and non-atherosclerotic luminal occlusion. The pattern of the mucosal injury is, in this case, potentially a consequence of acute and chronic ischemic processes secondary to mesenteric arteriovenous vasculopathy.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Malformations/pathology , Crohn Disease/pathology , Mesentery/blood supply , Adipose Tissue/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Arteries/abnormalities , Arteries/pathology , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Constriction, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Constriction, Pathologic/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/pathology , Intestine, Small/surgery , Mesentery/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Veins/abnormalities , Veins/pathology
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 58(3): 281-90, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24383612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the role of perioperative epidural analgesia in improving cancer outcomes. The heterogeneity of studies (tumour type, stage and outcome endpoints) has produced inconsistent results. Clinical practice also highlights the variability in epidural effectiveness. We considered the novel hypothesis that effective epidural analgesia improves cancer outcomes following gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery in patients with grouped pathological staging. METHODS: Following institutional approval, a database analysis identified 140 patients, with 2-year minimum follow-up after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (2005-2010). Information pertaining to cancer and survival outcomes was extracted. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated a 1-year 14% vs. 33% (P = 0.01) and 2-year 27% vs. 40% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09, P = 0.087] incidence of cancer recurrence in patients with (vs. without) effective (> 36 h duration) epidural analgesia, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased time to cancer recurrence (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival benefit (HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P < 0.0001) at 2-year follow-up following effective epidural analgesia. Subgroup analysis identified epidural-related cancer recurrence benefit in patients with oesophageal cancer (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.005) and in patients with tumour lymphovascular space infiltration (LVSI), (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94, P = 0.03). Effective epidural analgesia improved estimated median time to death (2.9 vs. 1.8 years, P = 0.029) in patients with tumour LVSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between effective post-operative epidural analgesia and medium-term benefit on cancer recurrence and survival following oesophageal surgery. A prospective study that controls for disease type, stage and epidural effectiveness is warranted.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Esophageal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & control , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophagus/pathology , Esophagus/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Stomach/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Survival Analysis
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 99(5): 662-5, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17872936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines of 2002 recommended the use of ultrasound (US) for central venous catheterization in order to minimize complications associated with central line placement. An ongoing audit of line placement by anaesthetists in the theatre complex of a tertiary referral centre looked at the associated complication rates. The objective of the study was to compare complication rates pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines. METHODS: This prospective, single centre audit looked at all patients in whom a central venous catheter was placed for surgery. Complication rates were assessed for procedures that were performed pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines. In total, 438 patients were identified for the study, and the procedures were performed either by trainee or by consultant anaesthetists. RESULTS: The pre- and post-implementation complication rates were 10.5% (16/152) and 4.6% (13/284), respectively, representing an absolute risk reduction of 5.9% (95% CI 0.5-11.3%). Comparison of those procedures in which US was used when compared with the landmark technique after implementation found a reduction of 6.9% in complications (95% CI 1.4-12.4%). The reduction in complication rates was larger for specialist registrars than for consultants (11.2% vs 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of NICE guidelines has been associated with a significant reduction in complication rates in our tertiary referral centre. In the light of the cross-speciality evidence of US superiority and our results, it is imperative that routine use of US guidance becomes more widespread.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , London , Medical Audit , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...