Outcomes of Combined Scleral Buckling Plus Pneumatic Retinopexy Vs. Scleral Buckling for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes and complications of scleral buckle surgery alone or combined with pneumatic retinopexy (pneumatic buckle) for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirteen patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment of whom 101 underwent primary scleral buckle surgery at Rabin Medical Center in 2005-2015 (SB group) and 112 underwent pneumatic buckle surgery at Royal Alexandra Hospital in 2013-2015 (PB group). METHODS: All patients were followed for ≥12 months. Data on clinical and surgical parameters, outcome, and complications were collected from the medical files. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best corrected visual acuity and anatomical outcomes. RESULTS: At 12 months, average best corrected visual acuity was 0.3 logMar in the SB group and 0.42 logMar in the PB group (P < 0.05). Rates of anatomical reattachment were high and similar in the two groups (99% and 97%, respectively, P = 0.623). The SB group had a higher percentage of patients requiring additional laser applications (21% vs. 7%; P < 0.01) and buckle readjustment surgery (6% vs. 0; P = 0.01), and the PB group had a higher percentage of patients who required postoperative pars plana vitrectomy (30% vs. 17%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Scleral buckle surgery alone is efficient for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Its combination with pneumatic retinopexy usually has no significant added value in terms of anatomical reattachment rate. Outcomes of Pneumatic buckling vs Scleral Buckling for RRD.

External lumbar drainage in progressive pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by increased intracranial pressure despite normal cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging findings. Initial management is typically medical; however, nearly 10% of children will eventually require surgery for persistent headache and/or vision loss. External lumbar drainage, which is a considerably safer treatment option, has not been adequately analyzed in children with medically refractory IIH. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of children with medically refractory IIH who had undergone external lumbar drain (ELD) placement because of worsening papilledema, reflected as increased retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) testing. The main outcome measures were effects of external lumbar drainage on papilledema resolution, symptoms, and vision. RESULTS: The authors analyzed the medical records of 13 children with IIH (11 girls, mean age 15.0 ± 2.3 years) whose mean CSF opening pressure was 45.5 ± 6.8 cm H2O. In all children, the average global RNFL thickness in both eyes significantly increased at ELD placement (right eye 371.8 ± 150.2 µm, left eye 400.3 ± 96.9 µm) compared with presentation thickness (right eye 301.6 ± 110.40 µm, left eye 350.2 ± 107.7 µm) despite acetazolamide medical therapy (20-30 mg/kg/day), leading to ELD placement after 9.5 ± 6.9 days (range 3-29 days). After ELD insertion, there was headache resolution, gradual and continuous improvement in optic disc thickness, and preservation of good vision. CONCLUSIONS: ELD placement in children with medically refractory IIH who demonstrated worsening papilledema with increased RNFL thickening on OCT testing typically results in symptom relief and disc edema resolution with good visual outcome, often preventing the need for additional definitive surgeries that carry greater failure and morbidity risks.