Alternative methods for assessing bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Bronchodilator reversibility testing is recommended in all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but does not predict improvements in breathlessness or exercise performance. Two alternative ways of assessing lung mechanics-measurement of end expiratory lung volume (EELV) using the inspiratory capacity manoeuvre and application of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) during tidal breathing to detect tidal airflow limitation-do relate to the degree of breathlessness in COPD. Their usefulness as end points in bronchodilator reversibility testing has not been examined. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with clinically stable COPD (mean age 69.9 (1.5) years, 15 men, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 29.5 (1.6)% predicted) with tidal flow limitation as assessed by their maximum flow-volume loop. Spirometric parameters, slow vital capacity (SVC), inspiratory capacity (IC), and NEP were measured seated, before and after nebulised saline, and at intervals after 5 mg nebulised salbutamol and 500 microg nebulised ipratropium bromide. The patients attended twice and the treatment order was randomised. RESULTS: Mean FEV(1), FVC, SVC, and IC were unchanged after saline but the degree of tidal flow limitation varied. FEV(1) improved significantly after salbutamol and ipratropium (0.11 (0.02) l and 0.09 (0.02) l, respectively) as did the other lung volumes with further significant increases after the combination. Tidal volume and mean expiratory flow increased significantly after all bronchodilators but breathlessness fell significantly only after the combination treatment. The initial NEP score was unrelated to subsequent changes in lung volume. CONCLUSIONS: NEP is not an appropriate measurement of acute bronchodilator responsiveness. Changes in IC were significantly larger than those in FEV(1) and may be more easily detected. However, our data showed no evidence for separation of "reversible" and "irreversible" groups whatever outcome measure was adopted.

Antimicrobial management of acute exacerbation of chronic airflow limitation.

Antibiotics are frequently administered for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, yet their role remains unclear. We prospectively audited the antimicrobial management of 167 patients aged >50 years hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic airflow limitation. Antibiotics were commenced on admission for 151 (90%) patients (oral 52%, intravenous 38%), including 17/23 (74%) with no evidence of fever, purulent sputum, leucocytosis or inflammatory chest X-ray changes. The mean number of different antibiotics prescribed was 1.8 (range 0-6); a wide range of antibiotics and antibiotic combinations were used. Sputum samples were sent for microbiological examination in 101 (61%) patients. Sputum culture was positive in 34, but only 11 (7% of the total) had amoxycillin-resistant organisms in their sputum. Seventeen patients (10%) developed diarrhoea while in hospital. Under logistic regression analysis, total number of antibiotics prescribed (p<0.0001) and age (p=0.0062) were the two factors associated with hospital-acquired diarrhoea. Only 34% of patients had received an influenza vaccination in the winter of the study, and 10% a pneumococcal vaccination within the last 5 years. In routine clinical practice, aggressive antibiotic therapy was frequently administered to patients admitted with chronic airflow limitation, despite limited clinical, radiological and microbial indications. Excessive use of antibiotics has important implications, including morbidity (antibiotic-associated diarrhoea), cost and the potential for increased microbial antibiotic resistance. A minority of patients with chronic airflow limitation are being vaccinated against influenza and Pneumococcus.