METEOR Trial Reports on the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Low-Risk Individuals with Subclinical Atherosclerosis.

PRACTICE PEARL: The data from the METEOR trial show that asymptomatic low-risk patients treated with rosuvastatin have a reduction in progression of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) over 2 years versus placebo. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Crouse JR 3rd, Raichlen JS, Riley WA, et al; METEOR Study Group. Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: the METEOR Trial. JAMA. 2007;297(12):1344-1353.

Validation of a method to measure resident doctors' reflections on quality improvement.

OBJECTIVES: Resident reflection on the clinical learning environment is prerequisite to identifying quality improvement (QI) opportunities and demonstrating competence in practice-based learning. However, residents' abilities to reflect on QI opportunities are unknown. Therefore, we developed and determined the validity of the Mayo Evaluation of Reflection on Improvement Tool (MERIT) for assessing resident reflection on QI opportunities. METHODS: The content of MERIT, which consists of 18 items structured on 4-point scales, was based on existing literature and input from national experts. Using MERIT, six faculty members rated 50 resident reflections. Factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality of MERIT instrument scores. Inter-rater and internal consistency reliabilities were calculated. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed three factors (eigenvalue; number of items): Reflection on Personal Characteristics of QI (8.5; 7); Reflection on System Characteristics of QI (1.9; 6), and Problem of Merit (1.5; 5). Inter-rater reliability was very good (intraclass correlation coefficient range: 0.73-0.89). Internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.93 overall and 0.83-0.91 for factors). Item mean scores were highest for Problem of Merit (3.29) and lowest for Reflection on System Characteristics of QI (1.99). CONCLUSIONS: Validity evidence supports MERIT as a meaningful measure of resident reflection on QI opportunities. Our findings suggest that dimensions of resident reflection on QI opportunities may include personal, system and Problem of Merit factors. Additionally, residents may be more effective at reflecting on 'problems of merit' than personal and systems factors.

Testosterone use in men with sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials to measure the effect of testosterone use on sexual function in men with sexual dysfunction and varying testosterone levels. METHODS: Librarian-designed search strategies were used to search the MEDLINE (1966 to October 2004), EMBASE (1988 to October 2004), and Cochrane CENTRAL (inception to October 2004) databases. The MEDLINE search was rerun in March 2005. We also reviewed reference lists from included studies and content expert files. We selected randomized placebo-controlled trials of testosterone vs placebo that enrolled men with sexual dysfunction and measured satisfaction with erectile function and libido and overall sexual satisfaction. RESULTS: We included 17 trials (N = 862 participants) in this review. Trials that enrolled participants with low testosterone levels showed (1) a moderate nonsignificant and inconsistent effect of testosterone use on satisfaction with erectile function (random-effects pooled effect size, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.10 to 1.60), (2) a large effect on libido (pooled effect size, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.40 to 2.25), and (3) no significant effect on overall sexual satisfaction. Trials that enrolled patients with low-normal and normal testosterone levels at baseline showed testosterone that caused (1) a small effect on satisfaction with erectile function (pooled effect size, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.65), (2) moderate nonsignificant effect on libido (pooled effect size, 0.41; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.83), and (3) no significant effect on overall sexual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Testosterone use in men is associated with small improvements in satisfaction with erectile function and moderate improvements in libido. Unexplained inconsistent results across trials, wide CIs, and possible reporting bias weaken these inferences.

Testosterone and cardiovascular risk in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed the effect of testosterone use on cardiovascular events and risk factors in men with different degrees of androgen deficiency. METHODS: Librarian-designed search strategies were used to search the MEDLINE (1966 to October 2004), EMBASE (1988 to October 2004), and Cochrane CENTRAL (inception to October 2004) databases. The database search was performed again in March 2005. We also reviewed reference lists from included studies and content expert files. Eligible studies were randomized trials that compared any formulation of commercially available testosterone with placebo and that assessed cardiovascular risk factors (lipid fractions, blood pressure, blood glucose), cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, angina or claudication, revascularization, stroke), and cardiovascular surrogate end points (ie, laboratory tests indicative of cardiac or vascular disease). Using a standardized data extraction form, we collected data on participants, testosterone administration, and outcome measures. We assessed study quality with attention to allocation concealment, blinding, and loss to follow-up. RESULTS: The 30 trials included 1642 men, 808 of whom were treated with testosterone. Overall, the trials had limited reporting of methodological features that prevent biased results (only 6 trials reported allocation concealment), enrolled few patients, and were of brief duration (only 4 trials followed up patients for > 1 year). The median loss to follow-up across all 30 trials was 9%. Testosterone use in men with low testosterone levels led to inconsequential changes in blood pressure and glycemia and in all lipid fractions (total cholesterol: odds ratio [OR], -0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.71 to 0.27; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: OR, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.30; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: OR, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.42; and triglycerides: OR, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.08); results were similar in patients with low-normal to normal testosterone levels. The OR between testosterone use and any cardiovascular event pooled across trials that reported these events (n = 6) was 1.82 (95% CI, 0.78 to 4.23). Several trials failed to report data on measured outcomes. For reasons we could not explain statistically, the results were inconsistent across trials. CONCLUSION: Currently available evidence weakly supports the inference that testosterone use in men is not associated with important cardiovascular effects. Patients and clinicians need large randomized trials of men at risk for cardiovascular disease to better inform the safety of long-term testosterone use.

Testosterone use in men and its effects on bone health. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

CONTEXT: Androgen-deficient men are at increased risk of osteoporosis. The extent to which testosterone can prevent and treat osteoporosis in men remains unclear. OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials in men to estimate the effect of testosterone use on bone health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: The review encompassed librarian-designed search strategies using MEDLINE (1966 to March 2005), EMBASE (1988 to March 2005), and Cochrane CENTRAL (inception to March 2005); a review of reference lists from included studies; and content expert files. DATA COLLECTION: Independently and in duplicate, we assessed the methodological quality of the eligible trials and collected data on bone mineral density and bone fractures at the longest point of complete follow-up. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included eight trials enrolling 365 patients. Two trials followed patients for more than 1 yr. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that, compared with placebo, im testosterone was associated with an 8% (95% confidence interval, 4%, 13%) gain in lumbar bone mineral density and transdermal testosterone had no significant impact. Testosterone use was associated with a nonsignificant 4% (95% confidence interval, -2%, 9%) gain in femoral neck bone mineral density with unexplained differences in results across trials (26% of these differences were not explained by chance alone). No trials measured or reported the effect of testosterone on fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular testosterone moderately increased lumbar bone density in men; the results on femoral neck bone density are inconclusive. Without bone fracture data, the available trials offer weak and indirect inferences about the clinical efficacy of testosterone on osteoporosis prevention and treatment in men.