Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 6(10): 715-20, 2012 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103893

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical procedures is one of the measures employed to prevent the development of surgical site infections (SSI). The appropriate choice of antimicrobial agents, dosage regimen, timing, duration and use of intravenous route must be evidence based. This study aimed to assess the practice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and adherence of practitioners to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery and to explore reasons for non-compliance. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 20 Jordanian hospitals from October 2006 to June 2007. A questionnaire was designed to collect information from physicians regarding the practice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP), references used for guiding SAP practice, prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI), and causative microorganisms. RESULTS: SAP was employed in almost all surgical departments of hospitals. The improper timing of antimicrobial administration for SAP was attributed to lack of knowledge of the guidelines (46.1%), while the improper antimicrobial choice was ascribed to drug unavailability (61.8%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that physicians are aware of the importance of antimicrobial prophylaxis before surgical procedures. However, further efforts are needed to ensure the implementation of the standard SAP guidelines in Jordanian hospitals.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Guideline Adherence , Preoperative Care/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Jordan , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Biologicals ; 39(5): 333-5, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21873079

ABSTRACT

After the expiration of patents on originator biological products, Jordanian local manufacturers and the agents of international pharmaceutical companies in Jordan started to submit registration dossiers for biosimilar products. The Jordan Food and Drug Administration (JFDA) is the national regulatory authority responsible for the registration of biosimilar products. Biosimilars are registered under the same regulations used for drugs until specific guidelines for registration of biological and biosimilar products are released. Those regulations are called Criteria of Registration of Drugs, Vaccines, Sera and Biological Products, the Renewal of its Registration and the Cancellation of Any of them which was published in the official gazette in 2004 under the Provisional Law Number 80 of the year 2001, Drug and Pharmacy Law and its amendments of the year 2003. Also, the JFDA follows the EMA guidelines on similar biological medicinal products for specific active biological substances for non-clinical and clinical studies requirements and the EMA guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues. A post marketing surveillance study is requested after a biosimilar product is authorized. The JFDA keeps pace with all advances in the regulatory issues related to biosimilars in order to be capable of authorizing biosimilar products with a safe, effective and good quality profile.


Subject(s)
Drug Evaluation/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Evaluation/standards , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry/standards , Legislation, Drug/standards , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Jordan , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/standards , Quality Control
3.
J Headache Pain ; 10(4): 265-70, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19387792

ABSTRACT

Here, we investigated the prevalence of headache among adults in Jordan. The study was conducted from January 2007 to November 2008. A sample of 4,836 participants were permitted to complete a self-conducted screening questionnaire. As much as 82.3% of participants complained from headache at least once per year. 36.1% were tension-type headache and 59% of the participants had other family members who suffered from headache. Headaches affected everyday activities in 51.6% of the participants; 82.7% of participants did not seek medical attention for their headaches. Among those who used analgesics (75.6%), acetaminophen was the most common (91.43%). In conclusion, headache and overuse of analgesics were prevalent in a significant part of the society. Thus, there is a need to educate the public to ensure safe practices and to make the use and selling of analgesics more stringent.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Tension-Type Headache/epidemiology , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Jordan/epidemiology , Legislation, Drug/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Prevalence , Self Medication/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...