Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 31(9): 1969-1981, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35398163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures can be managed operatively or nonoperatively with functional bracing in the absence of neurovascular injury, open fracture, or polytrauma. A consensus on optimal management has not been reached, nor has the cost-effectiveness perspective been investigated. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed describing the management of humeral shaft fractures with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), and functional bracing in a non-elderly population. Probabilities were defined using weighted averages determined from systematic review of the literature. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, measured in cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-six studies were included. Using bracing as the referent in the health care model, we observed that bracing was the preferred strategy at both incremental cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds. ORIF and IMN had higher overall effectiveness (0.917 QALYs and 0.913 QALYs, respectively) compared with bracing (0.877 QALYs). The cost-effectiveness of bracing was driven by a substantially lower overall cost. In the societal model-accounting for both health care and societal costs-the cost difference narrowed between bracing, ORIF, and IMN. Bracing remained the preferred strategy at the $50,000/QALY threshold; ORIF was preferred at the $100,000/QALY threshold. ORIF and IMN were comparable strategies across a range of probability values in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Functional bracing, with its low cost and satisfactory clinical outcomes, is often the most cost-effective strategy for humeral shaft fracture management. ORIF becomes preferable at the higher willingness-to-pay threshold when societal burden is considered. QALY values for ORIF and IMN were comparable.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humeral Fractures , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Humerus , Open Fracture Reduction , Treatment Outcome
2.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 25(1): 2-7, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current literature on carbon fiber implant use in foot and ankle surgery is scant. The purpose of this paper is to report medium-term outcomes of hindfoot fusion using a carbon fiber intramedullary nail. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 cases of hindfoot fusion using carbon fiber intramedullary nail fixation between 2014 and 2017. We excluded revisions and cases with bulk allograft or ankle infection prior to surgery. We reviewed charts for length of followup, radiographic union, and complications. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included (6 females, 5 males; mean age=52±15years; mean BMI=29.0±6.4kg/m2). Mean followup was 20 (range, 1.5-107) months. Nine of eleven cases achieved radiographic union while one case developed a complication requiring surgery. The mean time to union was 3 (range, 1.5-6) months. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon fiber implants offer several theoretical advantages over traditional metallic implants. They can be used safely in foot and ankle surgery without concern for high failure or complication rate. Larger scale studies with longer followup are needed on this topic.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint/surgery , Arthritis/surgery , Arthrodesis/instrumentation , Bone Nails , Carbon Fiber , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
3.
Foot Ankle Spec ; 11(3): 223-229, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28677405

ABSTRACT

Distal fibula fractures represent a common problem in orthopaedics. When fibula fractures require operative fixation, implants are typically made from stainless steel or titanium alloys. Carbon fiber implants have been used elsewhere in orthopaedics for years, and their advantages include a modulus of elasticity similar to that of bone, biocompatibility, increased fatigue strength, and radiolucency. This study hypothesized that carbon fiber plates would provide similar outcomes for ankle fracture fixation as titanium and steel implants. A retrospective chart review was performed of 30 patients who underwent fibular open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The main outcomes assessed were postoperative union rate and complication rate. The nonunion or failure rate for carbon fiber plates was 4% (1/24), and the union rate was 96% (23/24). The mean follow-up time was 20 months, and the complication rate was 8% (2/24). Carbon fiber plates are a viable alternative to metal plates in ankle fracture fixation, demonstrating union and complication rates comparable to those of traditional fixation techniques. Their theoretical advantages and similar cost make them an attractive implant choice for ORIF of the fibula. However, further studies are needed for extended follow-up and inclusion of larger patient cohorts. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective Case series.


Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/surgery , Bone Plates , Carbon , Fibula/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Adult , Aged , Ankle Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Carbon Fiber , Cohort Studies , Device Removal , Female , Fibula/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...