Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 64(3-4): 178-86, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11442215

ABSTRACT

Prevention of placental malaria through administration of antimalarial medications to pregnant women in disease-endemic areas decreases the risk of delivery of low birth weight (LBW) infants. In areas of high Plasmodium falciparum transmission, two intermittent presumptive treatment doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy are effective in decreasing the prevalence of placental malaria in human immunodeficiency virus (HlV)-negative women, while HIV-positive women may require a monthly SP regimen to reduce their prevalence of placental parasitemia. A decision-analysis model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of three different presumptive SP treatment regimens with febrile case management with SP in terms of incremental cost per case LBW prevented. Factors considered included HIV seroprevalence, placental malaria prevalence, LBW incidence, the cost of SP, medical care for LBW infants, and HIV testing. For a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 pregnant women, the monthly SP regimen would always be the most effective strategy for reducing LBW associated with malaria. The two-dose SP and monthly SP regimens would prevent 172 and 229 cases of LBW, respectively, compared with the case management approach. At HIV seroprevalence rates greater than 10%, the monthly SP regimen is the least expensive strategy. At HIV seroprevalence rates less than 10%, the two-dose SP regimen would be the less expensive option. When only antenatal clinic costs are considered, the two-dose and monthly SP strategies cost US $11 and $14, respectively, well within the range considered cost effective. Presumptive treatment regimens to prevent LBW associated with malaria and the subsequent increased risk of mortality during the first year of life are effective and cost effective strategies in areas with both elevated HIV prevalence and malaria transmission rates.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/administration & dosage , Antimalarials/economics , Decision Support Techniques , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/prevention & control , Prenatal Care/economics , Pyrimethamine/administration & dosage , Pyrimethamine/economics , Sulfadoxine/administration & dosage , Sulfadoxine/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Female , Global Health , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Malaria, Falciparum/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/economics
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 21(1): 1-9, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11418251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many recommended clinical preventive services are delivered at low rates. Decision-makers who wish to improve delivery rates, but face competing demands for finite resources, need information on the relative value of these services. This article describes the results of a systematic assessment of the value of clinical preventive services recommended for average-risk patients by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. METHODS: The assessment of services' value for the U.S. population was based on two dimensions: burden of disease prevented by each service and cost effectiveness. Methods were developed for measuring these criteria consistently across different types of services. A companion article describes the methods in greater detail. Each service received 1 to 5 points on each of the two dimensions, for total scores ranging from 2 to 10. Priority opportunities for improving delivery rates were determined by comparing the ranking of services with what is known of current delivery rates nationally. RESULTS: The highest ranked services (scores of 7+) with the lowest delivery rates (< or =50% nationally) are providing tobacco cessation counseling to adults, screening older adults for undetected vision impairments, offering adolescents an anti-tobacco message or advice to quit, counseling adolescents on alcohol and drug abstinence, screening adults for colorectal cancer, screening young women for chlamydial infection, screening adults for problem drinking, and vaccinating older adults against pneumococcal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-makers can use the results to set their own priorities for increasing delivery of clinical preventive services. The methods provide a basis for future priority-setting efforts.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Guideline Adherence/standards , Health Priorities , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Preventive Health Services/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Child , Cost Savings , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making, Organizational , Decision Trees , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/standards , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Needs Assessment , Preventive Health Services/economics , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Prevention/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 21(1): 10-9, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11418252

ABSTRACT

Methods used to compare the value of clinical preventive services based on two criteria-clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost effectiveness (CE)-are described. A companion article provides rankings of clinical preventive services and discusses its uses for decision-makers; this article focuses on the methods, challenges faced, and solutions. The authors considered all types of data essential to measuring CPB and CE for services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and developed methods essential to ensuring valid comparisons of different services' relative value.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Priorities/organization & administration , Health Services Research/methods , Preventive Health Services/economics , Preventive Health Services/standards , Primary Prevention/economics , Primary Prevention/standards , Bias , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making, Organizational , Humans , Morbidity , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States/epidemiology
4.
Inj Prev ; 7(4): 276-81, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11770651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of the Lifesavers Residential Fire and Injury Prevention Program (LRFIPP), a smoke alarm giveaway program. SETTING: In 1990, the LRFIPP distributed over 10,000 smoke alarms in an area of Oklahoma City at high risk for residential fire injuries. The program also included fire prevention education and battery replacement components. METHODS: A cost effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal and health care systems perspectives. The study compared program costs with the total costs of medical treatment and productivity losses averted over a five year period. Fatal and non-fatal residential fire related injuries prevented were estimated from surveillance data. Medical costs were obtained from chart reviews of patients with fire related injuries that occurred during the pre-intervention period. RESULTS: During the five years post-intervention, it is estimated that the LRFIPP prevented 20 fatal and 24 non-fatal injuries. From the societal perspective, the total discounted cost of the program was $531,000. Total discounted net savings exceeded $15 million. From the health care system perspective, the total discounted net savings were almost $1 million and would have a net saving even if program effectiveness was reduced by 64%. CONCLUSIONS: The program was effective in reducing fatal and non-fatal residential fire related injuries and was cost saving. Similar programs in other high risk areas would be good investments even if program effectiveness was lower than that achieved by the LRFIPP.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Home/prevention & control , Fires/prevention & control , Accident Prevention , Accidents, Home/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fires/economics , Humans , Oklahoma
6.
Am J Manag Care ; 5(4): 445-54, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10387384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the potential value and current limitations of using resource allocation models for selecting health services. DESIGN: To identify the most efficient mix of preventive services that could be offered by a managed care organization (MCO) for a fixed budget, an optimization model (greatest number of life years saved) and a cost-effectiveness model (rank order of most to least cost effective) were developed. Because of the lack of cost-effectiveness analyses that met the study criteria, only 9 preventive services were selected to demonstrate each model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 2 models were applied to a hypothetical managed care population of 100,000 enrollees with age, sex, and risk distribution similar to that of the US population. Data for the input variables were obtained from cost-effectiveness studies of 9 preventive services. Model variables included the target population, percent of enrollees who received the preventive service, the cost of the preventive service, life years saved, and cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: The models demonstrated that efficient allocation of finite resources can be achieved. When budgets are limited, different premises between the 2 models may yield different health consequences. However, as the budgets were increased, results from the 2 models were more closely aligned. CONCLUSIONS: Resource allocation models have the potential for assisting MCOs in selecting a set of preventive services that will maximize population health. Before this potential can be fully realized, additional methodological development and cost-effectiveness studies are needed. The use of resource allocation should be examined for selecting all healthcare services.


Subject(s)
Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Preventive Health Services/economics , Budgets , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Rationing/methods , Health Services Research/economics , Managed Care Programs/economics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preventive Health Services/standards , Preventive Health Services/supply & distribution , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States
7.
Am J Prev Med ; 16(3): 248-63, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10198666

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Because human and financial resources are limited, health efforts must focus on prevention strategies that yield the most benefit for the investment. Many current strategies identified in the literature offer opportunities to promote health at a reasonable cost. OBJECTIVE: To present a literature-based review of evidence demonstrating that prevention can be an effective and wise use of resources through CDC's An Ounce of Prevention ... What Are the Returns? Second Edition. DESIGN: Systematic review of cost-effectiveness literature for a selected group of prevention strategies. SETTING: Prevention strategies relevant to the U.S. population. RESULTS: Data indicate that the health conditions considered can be addressed through prevention strategies that are either cost effective or cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: An Ounce of Prevention ... What Are the Returns? Second Edition can be used to conveniently access information on prevention strategies, the diseases and injuries they address, and their cost effectiveness. It also complements other comprehensive prevention guides. However, limitations of the available cost-effectiveness studies indicate that standardized procedures should be followed for studies of all recommended prevention strategies. Researchers must standardize review procedures to improve both the quality and comparability of studies.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Health Status , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Life Expectancy , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Preventive Health Services/economics , United States/epidemiology
9.
Arch Intern Med ; 158(11): 1245-9, 1998 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9625404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Arthritis Self-Help Course in reducing the pain of arthritis, the leading cause of disability in the United States and a common problem among older adults. METHODS: A decision model was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of the Arthritis Self-Help Course among individuals with arthritis over a 4-year analytic horizon from 2 perspectives, namely, society and the health care system. The Arthritis Self-Help Course was assumed to reduce pain by 20% and physician visits for arthritis by 40% among individuals receiving conventional medical therapy. Estimates for program costs, costs for physician visits, and time and transportation costs were derived from the published literature and expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on all relevant parameters. Arthritis pain and costs (program, physician visit plus/minus time and transportation) were expressed as cost per person per unit reduction in pain. Because nearly all analyses showed the program to be cost saving, we simply report the reduction in joint pain and the cost savings, because standardizing cost savings is not a useful concept. RESULTS: From both the societal and health care system perspectives, the Arthritis Self-Help Course was cost saving in base-case analyses (reducing pain by 0.9 units while saving $320 and $267, respectively) and throughout the range of reasonable values used in univariate sensitivity analyses. Cost savings were due primarily to reduced physician visits. CONCLUSIONS: The Arthritis Self-Help Course is a cost-saving intervention that further reduces arthritis pain among individuals receiving conventional medical therapy. The benefits for both patients and health care providers warrant its more widespread use as a normal adjunct to conventional therapy.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/therapy , Decision Support Techniques , Patient Education as Topic , Teaching Materials , Adult , Arthritis/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Pain Management , Patient Education as Topic/economics
10.
JAMA ; 279(17): 1371-6, 1998 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9582045

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children, and a live, oral vaccine may soon be licensed for prevention. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic impact of a national rotavirus immunization program in the United States. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed from the perspectives of the health care system and society. A decision tree used estimates of disease burden, costs, vaccine coverage, efficacy, and price obtained from published and unpublished sources. INTERVENTION: The proposed vaccine would be administered to infants at ages 2, 4, and 6 months as part of the routine schedule of childhood immunizations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, outcomes prevented, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A routine, universal rotavirus immunization program would prevent 1.08 million cases of diarrhea, avoiding 34000 hospitalizations, 95000 emergency department visits, and 227000 physician visits in the first 5 years of life. At $20 per dose, the program would cost $289 million and realize a net loss of $107 million to the health care system-$103 per case prevented. The program would provide a net savings of $296 million to society. Threshold analysis identified a break-even price per dose of $9 for the health care system and $51 for the societal perspective. Greater disease burden and greater vaccine efficacy and lower vaccine price increased cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: A US rotavirus immunization program would be cost-effective from the perspectives of society and the health care system, although the cost of the immunization program would not be fully offset by the reduction in health care cost of rotavirus diarrhea unless the price fell to $9 per dose.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , National Health Programs/economics , Rotavirus Infections/economics , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines , Rotavirus/immunology , Vaccination/economics , Viral Vaccines/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans , Infant , Morbidity , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Vaccines, Attenuated , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage
11.
Sex Transm Dis ; 24(5): 287-92, 1997 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9153739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Partner notification is an important strategy for prevention of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). PID can be prevented by early diagnosis and treatment of the female sex partners of men infected with C. trachomatis (strategy 1) and by preventing reinfection in women through diagnosis and treatment of their male sex partners (strategy 2). STUDY DESIGN: Using a decision model, the cost-effectiveness of strategies 1 and 2 was compared to no partner notification. Outcomes were measured by cases of PID prevented and net costs expended from a health care system perspective. RESULTS: In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 male and 1,000 female index patients, strategy 1 prevented 64 and strategy 2 prevented 20 cases of PID. Strategy 1 saved $247,000 and strategy 2 saved $33,000 over no partner notification. Sensitivity analysis showed that strategy 1 was cost-effective across a wide range of assumptions. Strategy 2 was cost-effective at baseline, but its cost-saving ability was subject to changes in the model. CONCLUSION: Partner notification of both male and female index patients is a cost-effective public health strategy for prevention of PID. In most settings, both strategies can and should be implemented.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Contact Tracing/economics , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , United States
13.
JAMA ; 276(2): 139-45, 1996 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8656506

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a short-course zidovudine program to prevent perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 in sub-Saharan African country settings. DESIGN AND SETTING: Several clinical trials of short-course zidovudine during pregnancy for prevention of perinatal transmission of HIV are under way in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa. A decision model was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of zidovudine programs in a hypothetical 1-year birth cohort in a sub-Saharan African setting from the perspective of the health care system and of society. A completed short course of zidovudine was assumed to reduce perinatal HIV transmission from 25% to 16.5%, approximately one half of the effect of the longer-course zidovudine. Estimates of program costs, lifetime HIV-related health care costs, and lost productivity costs were derived from the published literature and from preliminary data available from sites of planned clinical trials. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on all relevant parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical costs, lost productivity costs, program costs, cost savings, and incremental cost-effectiveness, expressed as cost per infant HIV infection prevented. RESULTS: The model estimated that a national zidovudine program in a setting with 12.5% HIV seroprevalence would reduce perinatal HIV incidence by 12% (4.9 infections per 1000 births). The costs to the health care system would be $3748 per infant HIV infection prevented. When productivity losses were included in the model, the cost decreases to $1115 per infant HIV infection prevented. The cost to implement a national zidovudine program including the cost of counseling, testing, and drugs, would be $2 million per 100,000 births or $20 per pregnant woman. In the base case, decreases in the cost of counseling and testing and increases in maternal HIV prevalence, zidovudine efficacy, and medical and lost productivity costs improved cost-effectiveness of the zidovudine program. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming demonstrable efficacy of short-course zidovudine prevention of perinatal HIV, a national perinatal HIV prevention program with zidovudine in most sub-Saharan African country settings would reduce the incidence of infant HIV infection and, in some settings, provide societal savings; however, substantial initial investment in such programs will be required. Where health care resources are limited, as in these regions, allocation of resources to a perinatal zidovudine program will need to be considered in the context of resources required for other pressing medical care needs.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/economics , Developing Countries , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV-1 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Zidovudine/economics , Africa South of the Sahara , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Developing Countries/economics , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/economics , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Program Development/economics , Zidovudine/administration & dosage , Zidovudine/therapeutic use
14.
Arch Intern Med ; 156(9): 1013-6, 1996 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8624166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 1992, a food-borne outbreak of hepatitis A associated with a catering facility in Denver, Colo, resulted in 43 secondary cases of hepatitis A and the potential exposure of approximately 5000 patrons. OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) disease control costs, including state and local health department personnel costs, provision and administration of immune globulin, and cost of extra hepatitis A serologic tests performed; (2) business losses; and (3) cost of the cases' illnesses. METHODS: Cost data were collected from hospitals, health maintenance organizations, health departments, laboratories, the caterer's insurance company, and the catering facility involved in the outbreak. RESULTS: The total costs assessed in the outbreak from a societal perspective were $809,706. Disease control costs were $689,314, which included $450,397 for 16,293 immune globulin injections and $105,699 for 2777 hours of health department personnel time. The cases' medical costs were $46,064, or 7% of the disease control costs. CONCLUSIONS: The cases' medical costs and productivity losses were only a minor component of the total cost of this outbreak. The high cost of food-borne outbreaks should be taken into account in economic analyses of the vaccination of food handlers with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Food Microbiology , Hepatitis A/economics , Colorado/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Hepatitis A/transmission , Humans
15.
Pediatrics ; 96(4 Pt 1): 609-15, 1995 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7567319

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic consequences in the United States of routine childhood immunization of children younger than 1 year of age with a rotavirus (RV) vaccine. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a national RV immunization program from the perspective of the health care system and the perspective of society. Estimates of disease incidence, medical expenditures, productivity costs, vaccine efficacy, and vaccine coverage rates were derived from published literature and unpublished vaccine trial reports. The impact of changes in estimates of vaccine efficacy and medical costs was determined by sensitivity analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost effectiveness, expressed as savings per case of RV diarrhea prevented. RESULTS: Given a vaccine efficacy rate of 50% and a vaccine cost of $30 per dose, an RV immunization program would prevent more than 1 million cases of RV diarrhea, 58,000 hospitalizations, and 82 deaths per year. A vaccine program would cost $243 million per year but would yield net savings of $79 million from the perspective of the health care system and $466 million from the perspective of society. The incremental cost effectiveness was a savings of $459 per case prevented from the societal perspective and $78 per case prevented from the health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses substantiated net savings over a wide range of variables, and cost effectiveness increased with greater vaccine efficacy or decreased vaccine cost. CONCLUSIONS: Economic and disease reduction benefits would be realized from the use of an RV vaccine that is partially protective against severe RV diarrhea. These findings suggest that immunization with an RV vaccine would be cost effective and cost saving.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Infant , Models, Economic , Rotavirus Infections/economics , Treatment Outcome , United States
16.
Sex Transm Dis ; 22(5): 274-80, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7502180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Azithromycin, an approved single-dose therapy for cervical chlamydia infections, costs four times as much as doxycycline, the standard multidose theapy. GOAL OF THIS STUDY: This study examined whether azithromycin is cost effective for treating cervical chlamydia infections. STUDY DESIGN: Two diagnostic strategies were compared: 1) laboratory confirmation of chlamydia, and 2) presumptive diagnosis from the perspective of the healthcare system and the publicly funded clinic. RESULTS: From the healthcare perspective, the cost per case of pelvic inflammatory disease prevented with azithromycin ranges from a savings of $3,502 for laboratory confirmation to a cost of $792 for presumptive diagnosis. From the publicly funded clinic perspective, the cost per case of pelvic inflammatory disease prevented ranges from $709 for lab-confirmed diagnosis to $3,969 for presumptive treatment. CONCLUSION: For the healthcare system, azithromycin is a cost-effective alternative to doxycycline. However, the cost of azithromycin must decrease markedly for it to be less costly to the publicly funded clinic.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Azithromycin/economics , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia trachomatis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Chlamydia Infections/complications , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/economics , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/etiology , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/prevention & control
17.
Bull Med Libr Assoc ; 82(4): 396-400, 1994 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7841909

ABSTRACT

Network connectivity is critical in Arizona, where travel distances are great, academic programs dispersed, and health care practitioners often geographically isolated. Accordingly, the University of Arizona (UA) applied for $50,000.00 in National Library of Medicine/National Science Foundation (NLM/NSF) Connections Program funding to promote statewide collaboration in supporting UA's health sciences education and research programs by expanding network connectivity to hospitals and other health-related institutions. The proposal outlined three strategies: Each major nonuniversity teaching hospital would secure and maintain a leased communications line dedicated to network connectivity, and NSF funds would be used to buy some necessary hardward. NSF funds would be used to establish a modern bank for dial-up Internet access by rural practitioners and teaching sites. Co-principal investigators of the project would promote and support the use of this new statewide connectivity and foster its continued expansion. The proposal was based on a conservative philosophy: familiar technologies and, where possible, existing networks and equipment would be used. The proposal was approved, and NSF funds hastened creation of an expanded health information network in Arizona. Once that network was in place, participants moved quickly from managing the mechanics of connectivity to planning for a computing and communications platform with services. Private funds were obtained to help organize the Arizona Health Information Network to direct these expanded services.


Subject(s)
Computer Communication Networks/organization & administration , Financing, Organized , Information Services/organization & administration , Libraries, Medical/organization & administration , National Library of Medicine (U.S.) , Online Systems/organization & administration , Arizona , Computer Communication Networks/economics , Cost Allocation , Financing, Organized/economics , Humans , Information Services/economics , Libraries, Medical/economics , Library Automation/economics , National Library of Medicine (U.S.)/economics , Online Systems/economics , United States
18.
Biol Reprod ; 42(2): 307-16, 1990 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2110838

ABSTRACT

The specific cellular localization of prostaglandin endoperoxide (PGH) synthase was studied throughout the rat estrous cycle. Animals were necropsied at 1300 h on each day of the 4-day cycle, and an additional group was necropsied at 2300 h on proestrus. Ovaries were removed and processed for cellular identification of PGH synthase by immunohistochemistry. At all stages of the cycle, intense immunostaining was observed in newly formed corpora lutea. Luteal cells were immunoreactive, but the connective tissue centrum was unstained. Interstitial tissue contained heavily labeled cells, whereas the germinal epithelium exhibited faint staining. During estrus, metestrus, and diestrus, thecal cells from preantral and antral follicles contained PGH synthase immunoreactivity, but granulosa cells were unstained. Faint staining of mural granulosa cells was observed first in 78% of preovulatory follicles (less than 400-microns diameter) in ovaries collected on the afternoon of proestrus. After the luteinizing hormone surge, 95% of the preovulatory follicles exhibited PGH synthase staining. The percentage of immunoreactive granulosa cells in these preovulatory follicles increased 4-fold in ovaries collected at 2300 h on proestrus. The presence of ovarian PGH synthase throughout the rat estrous cycle and the changes in cellular localization may reflect the potential role of PGs in follicular and luteal function.


Subject(s)
Estrus/metabolism , Ovary/enzymology , Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases/metabolism , Animals , Female , Immunohistochemistry , Ovary/cytology , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...