Comparative Early Hemodynamic Profiles in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Septic and Nonseptic Acute Circulatory Failure Using Focused Echocardiography.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the early hemodynamic profile of patients presenting with acute circulatory failure to the Emergency Department (ED) using focused echocardiography performed by emergency physicians after a dedicated training program. METHODS: Patients presenting to the ED with an acute circulatory failure of any origin were successively examined by a recently trained emergency physician and by an expert in critical care echocardiography. Operators independently performed and interpreted online echocardiographic examinations to determine the leading mechanism of acute circulatory failure. RESULTS: Focused echocardiography could be performed in 100 of 114 screened patients (55 with sepsis/septic shock and 45 with shock of other origin) after a median fluid loading of 500 mL (interquartile range: 187-1,500 mL). A hypovolemic profile was predominantly observed whether the acute circulatory failure was of septic origin or not (33/55 [60%] vs. 23/45 [51%]: P = 0.37). Although a vasoplegic profile associated with a hyperkinetic left ventricle was most frequently identified in septic patients when compared with their counterparts (17/55 [31%] vs. 5/45 [11%]: P = 0.02), early left or right ventricular failure was observed in 31% of them. Hemodynamic profiles were adequately appraised by recently trained emergency physicians, as reflected by a good-to-excellent agreement with the expert's assessment (Κ: 0.61-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Hypovolemia was predominantly identified in patients presenting to the ED with acute circulatory failure. Although vasoplegia was more frequently associated with sepsis, early ventricular dysfunction was also depicted in septic patients. Focused echocardiography seemed reliable when performed by recently trained emergency physicians without previous experience in ultrasound.

[Misuse and adverse effects of new direct oral anticoagulants: A prospective observational study in patients admitted to an emergency unit of a French university hospital]. / Mésusage et iatrogénie des anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) : étude observationnelle dans le service des urgences du CHU de Limoges.

INTRODUCTION: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is complex: indications, dosage adjustments and precautions. Emergency departments (ED) are increasingly faced with patients receiving NOAC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the misuse and the adverse effects (AE) of NOAC. METHODS: All subjects with NOAC admitted to the Limoges University Hospital ED from 1/8/2013 to 1/4/2014 were included in a prospective observational study. Misuse was identified from the NOAC summary of product characteristics and from the 2014 ANSM guideline (indication, dose, co-medications, age, hepatic and renal function); adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 198 subjects were included receiving rivaroxaban (68.7 %), dabigatran (30.8 %) or apixaban (0.5 %). Main indications were embolic prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (78.7 %) and curative treatment of venous thromboembolism (17.2 %). In 16.2 % of the cases, the treatment was not in according to the guidelines: 78 % for prescribing errors (incorrect dosage according to age, renal function, co-medications) and 22 % for wrong initial indication. AE related to NOAC were encountered in 25.8 % patients. Hemorrhagic events were diagnosed in 36 patients with no according to the guidelines in 11.1 % of them. Hemorrhagic events resulted in 3 deaths (8.3 %). Thrombotic events occurred in 15 patients, all these patients were issued with appropriate guidelines. CONCLUSION: Through the view of an ED, this study confirms a part of misuse and highlights the risk of spontaneous bleeding of NOAC despite appropriate use.