ABSTRACT
Background: Computational pathology has seen rapid growth in recent years, driven by advanced deep-learning algorithms. Due to the sheer size and complexity of multi-gigapixel whole-slide images, to the best of our knowledge, there is no open-source software library providing a generic end-to-end API for pathology image analysis using best practices. Most researchers have designed custom pipelines from the bottom up, restricting the development of advanced algorithms to specialist users. To help overcome this bottleneck, we present TIAToolbox, a Python toolbox designed to make computational pathology accessible to computational, biomedical, and clinical researchers. Methods: By creating modular and configurable components, we enable the implementation of computational pathology algorithms in a way that is easy to use, flexible and extensible. We consider common sub-tasks including reading whole slide image data, patch extraction, stain normalization and augmentation, model inference, and visualization. For each of these steps, we provide a user-friendly application programming interface for commonly used methods and models. Results: We demonstrate the use of the interface to construct a full computational pathology deep-learning pipeline. We show, with the help of examples, how state-of-the-art deep-learning algorithms can be reimplemented in a streamlined manner using our library with minimal effort. Conclusions: We provide a usable and adaptable library with efficient, cutting-edge, and unit-tested tools for data loading, pre-processing, model inference, post-processing, and visualization. This enables a range of users to easily build upon recent deep-learning developments in the computational pathology literature.
ABSTRACT
Recent advances in whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology have led to the development of a myriad of computer vision and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive algorithms. Computational Pathology (CPath) offers an integrated solution to utilise information embedded in pathology WSIs beyond what can be obtained through visual assessment. For automated analysis of WSIs and validation of machine learning (ML) models, annotations at the slide, tissue, and cellular levels are required. The annotation of important visual constructs in pathology images is an important component of CPath projects. Improper annotations can result in algorithms that are hard to interpret and can potentially produce inaccurate and inconsistent results. Despite the crucial role of annotations in CPath projects, there are no well-defined guidelines or best practices on how annotations should be carried out. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by presenting the experience and best practices acquired during the execution of a large-scale annotation exercise involving a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, ML experts, and researchers as part of the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) consortium. We present a real-world case study along with examples of different types of annotations, diagnostic algorithm, annotation data dictionary, and annotation constructs. The analyses reported in this work highlight best practice recommendations that can be used as annotation guidelines over the lifecycle of a CPath project.
