Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neural Eng ; 13(1): 016017, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735572

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are known to have non-monotonic responses to increasing amplitudes of high frequency (2 kHz) biphasic electrical stimulation. That is, an increase in stimulation amplitude causes an increase in the cell's spike rate up to a peak value above which further increases in stimulation amplitude cause the cell to decrease its activity. The peak response for ON and OFF cells occurs at different stimulation amplitudes, which allows differential stimulation of these functional cell types. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the non-monotonic responses of ON and OFF brisk-transient RGCs and the mechanisms underlying their differential responses. APPROACH: Using in vitro patch-clamp recordings from rat RGCs, together with simulations of single and multiple compartment Hodgkin-Huxley models, we show that the non-monotonic response to increasing amplitudes of stimulation is due to depolarization block, a change in the membrane potential that prevents the cell from generating action potentials. MAIN RESULTS: We show that the onset for depolarization block depends on the amplitude and frequency of stimulation and reveal the biophysical mechanisms that lead to depolarization block during high frequency stimulation. Our results indicate that differences in transmembrane potassium conductance lead to shifts of the stimulus currents that generate peak spike rates, suggesting that the differential responses of ON and OFF cells may be due to differences in the expression of this current type. We also show that the length of the axon's high sodium channel band (SOCB) affects non-monotonic responses and the stimulation amplitude that leads to the peak spike rate, suggesting that the length of the SOCB is shorter in ON cells. SIGNIFICANCE: This may have important implications for stimulation strategies in visual prostheses.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Membrane Potentials/physiology , Models, Neurological , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Animals , Computer Simulation , Differential Threshold/physiology , Rats , Rats, Long-Evans , Reproducibility of Results , Retinal Ganglion Cells/cytology , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng ; 23(2): 169-78, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25343761

ABSTRACT

Epiretinal prostheses aim to restore visual perception in the blind through electrical stimulation of surviving retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). While the effects of several waveform parameters (e.g., phase duration) on stimulation efficacy have been described, their relative influence remains unclear. Further, morphological differences between RGC classes represent a key source of variability that has not been accounted for in previous studies. Here we investigate the effect of electrical stimulus waveform parameters on activation of an anatomically homogenous RGC population and describe a technique for identifying optimal stimulus parameters to minimize the required stimulus charge. Responses of rat A2-type RGCs to a broad array of biphasic stimulation parameters, delivered via an epiretinal stimulating electrode (200 × 200 µ m) were recorded using whole-cell current clamp techniques. The data demonstrate that for rectangular charge-balanced stimuli, phase duration and polarity have the largest effect on threshold current amplitude-cells were most responsive to cathodic-first pulses of short phase duration. Waveform asymmetry and increases in interphase interval further reduced thresholds. Using optimal waveform parameters, we observed a drop in stimulus efficacy with increasing stimulation frequency. This was more pronounced for large cells. Our results demonstrate that careful choice of electrical waveform parameters can significantly improve the efficacy of electrical stimulation and the efficacy of implantable neurostimulators for the retina.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...