The role and novel use of natural killer cells in graft-versus-leukemia reactions after allogeneic transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has transformed over the past several decades through enhanced supportive care, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), improved human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, and novel graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-prevention and treatment strategies. Most notably, the implementation of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has dramatically increased the safety and availability of this life-saving therapy. Given reductions in nonrelapse mortality (NRM) with these advances, the HCT community has placed even greater emphasis on developing ways to reduce relapse - the leading cause of death after HCT. When using RIC HCT, protection from relapse relies predominantly on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reactions. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), adoptive cellular therapy, checkpoint inhibition, and post-HCT maintenance strategies represent approaches under study that aim to augment or synergize with the GVL effects of HCT. Optimizing donor selection algorithms to leverage GVL represents another active area of research. Many of these strategies seek to harness the effects of T cells, which for decades were felt to be the primary mediators of GVL and the focus of investigation in relapse reduction. However, there is growing interest in capitalizing on the ability of natural killer (NK) cells to yield potent anti-tumor effects. A potential advantage of NK cell-based approaches over T cell-mediated is the potential to reduce NRM in addition to relapse. By decreasing infection, without increasing the risk of GVHD, NK cells may mitigate NRM, while still yielding relapse reduction through identification and clearance of cancer cells. Most T cell-focused relapse-prevention strategies must weigh the benefits of relapse reduction against the increased risk of NRM from GVHD. In contrast, NK cells have the potential to reduce both, potentially tipping the scales significantly in favor of survival. Here, we will review the role of NK cells in GVL, optimization of NK cell match or mismatch, and burgeoning areas of research in NK cell therapy such as adoptive transfer and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) NK cells.

Murine allogeneic CAR T cells integrated before or early after posttransplant cyclophosphamide exert antitumor effects.

Relapse limits the therapeutic efficacy both of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Patients may undergo these therapies sequentially to prevent or treat relapsed malignancy. However, direct integration of the 2 therapies has been avoided over concerns for potential induction of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by allogeneic CAR T cells. We have shown in murine T-cell-replete MHC-haploidentical allo-HCT that suppressive mechanisms induced immediately after posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), given on days +3/+4, prevent GVHD induction by alloreactive T cells infused as early as day +5. Therefore, we hypothesized that allogeneic CAR T cells given in a similarly integrated manner in our murine MHC-haploidentical allo-HCT model may safely exert antitumor effects. Indeed, allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T cells given early after (day +5) PTCy or even prior to (day 0) PTCy cleared leukemia without exacerbating the cytokine release syndrome occurring from the MHC-haploidentical allo-HCT or interfering with PTCy-mediated GVHD prevention. Meanwhile, CAR T-cell treatment on day +9 or day +14 was safe but less effective, suggesting a limited therapeutic window. CAR T cells infused before PTCy were not eliminated, but surviving CAR T cells continued to proliferate highly and expand despite PTCy. In comparison with infusion on day +5, CAR T-cell infusion on day 0 demonstrated superior clinical efficacy associated with earlier CAR T-cell expansion, higher phenotypic CAR T-cell activation, less CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ CAR T-cell recovery, and transcriptional changes suggesting increased activation of CD4+ CAR T cells and more cytotoxic CD8+ CAR T cells. This study provides mechanistic insight into PTCy's impact on graft-versus-tumor immunity and describes novel approaches to integrate CAR T cells and allo-HCT that may compensate for deficiencies of each individual approach.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Uniquely Restrains Alloreactive CD4+ T-Cell Proliferation and Differentiation After Murine MHC-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) reduces the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), thereby improving the safety and accessibility of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We have shown that PTCy works by inducing functional impairment and suppression of alloreactive T cells. We also have identified that reduced proliferation of alloreactive CD4+ T cells at day +7 and preferential recovery of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) at day +21 are potential biomarkers associated with optimal PTCy dosing and timing in our B6C3F1→B6D2F1 MHC-haploidentical murine HCT model. To understand whether the effects of PTCy are unique and also to understand better the biology of GVHD prevention by PTCy, here we tested the relative impact of cyclophosphamide compared with five other optimally dosed chemotherapeutics (methotrexate, bendamustine, paclitaxel, vincristine, and cytarabine) that vary in mechanisms of action and drug resistance. Only cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and cytarabine were effective in preventing fatal GVHD, but cyclophosphamide was superior in ameliorating both clinical and histopathological GVHD. Flow cytometric analyses of blood and spleens revealed that these three chemotherapeutics were distinct in constraining conventional T-cell numerical recovery and facilitating preferential Treg recovery at day +21. However, cyclophosphamide was unique in consistently reducing proliferation and expression of the activation marker CD25 by alloreactive CD4+Foxp3- conventional T cells at day +7. Furthermore, cyclophosphamide restrained the differentiation of alloreactive CD4+Foxp3- conventional T cells at both days +7 and +21, whereas methotrexate and cytarabine only restrained differentiation at day +7. No chemotherapeutic selectively eliminated alloreactive T cells. These data suggest that constrained alloreactive CD4+Foxp3- conventional T-cell numerical recovery and associated preferential CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg reconstitution at day +21 may be potential biomarkers of effective GVHD prevention. Additionally, these results reveal that PTCy uniquely restrains alloreactive CD4+Foxp3- conventional T-cell proliferation and differentiation, which may explain the superior effects of PTCy in preventing GVHD. Further study is needed to determine whether these findings also hold true in clinical HCT.