Anticoagulation management pre- and post atrial fibrillation ablation: a survey of canadian centres.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is crucial to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications. There are broad ranges of approaches to anticoagulation management pre and post AF ablation procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the anticoagulation strategies currently in use in patients peri- and post AF ablation in Canada. METHODS: A Web-based national survey of electrophysiologists performing AF ablation in Canada collected data regarding anticoagulation practice prior to ablation, periprocedural bridging, and duration of postablation anticoagulation. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 36 (97%) of the 37 electrophysiologists performing AF ablation across Canada. Prior to AF ablation, 58% of electrophysiologists started anticoagulation for patients with paroxysmal AF CHADS(2) scores of 0 to 1, 92% for paroxysmal AF CHADS(2) scores ≥ 2, 83% for persistent AF CHADS(2) scores of 0 to 1, and 97% for persistent AF CHADS(2) scores ≥ 2. For patients with CHADS(2) 0 to 1, warfarin was continued for at least 3 months by most physicians (89% for paroxysmal and 94% for persistent AF). For patients with CHADS(2) ≥ 2 and with no recurrence of AF at 1 year post ablation, 89% of physicians continued warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Although guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulation in patients with CHADS(2) ≥ 2, 11% of physicians would discontinue warfarin in patients with no evidence of recurrent AF 1 year post successful ablation. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding periprocedural anticoagulation management in clinical practice. Clinical trial evidence is required to guide optimal periprocedural anticoagulation and therapeutic decisions regarding long-term anticoagulation after an apparently successful catheter ablation for AF.

Biventricular pacing for end-stage heart failure: early experience in surgical vs. transvenous left ventricular lead placement.

Transvenous coronary sinus lead placement is currently the standard approach for left ventricular pacing. The aim of this study is to assess whether a mini-thoracotomy approach would be feasible and safe when used for cases in which transvenous procedures were ineffective or judged unlikely to succeed. Biventricular pacing was performed in 138 consecutive patients with 47 patients undergoing a mini-thoracotomy procedure. NYHA status, quality of life, electrical and echocardiographic data were assessed in the two groups over a follow-up period of 17.6+/-4.2 weeks. There was no significant difference in the preoperative characteristics in both groups other than a greater prevalence of renal failure and previous cardiac surgery among the surgical patients. The mean procedure time was significantly longer in the transvenous group. No significant differences were noted in the immediate or long-term pacing parameters. Two mortalities were observed in the surgical group >2 weeks following the procedure. During the follow-up period, we noted a comparable improvement in the echocardiographic parameters, QRS duration and NYHA status with both approaches. Our results suggest that even when performed on high-risk patients, epicardial lead placement through a mini-thoracotomy is beneficial and feasible as a 'rescue' procedure after a failed transvenous approach.

Sex differences in the relationship between amiodarone use and the need for permanent pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone use was associated with an increased need for pacemaker insertion in a retrospective study of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior myocardial infarction. The aims of this study were to determine prospectively whether amiodarone increases the need for pacemakers in a general population of patients with AF and whether this effect is modified by sex. METHODS: The study included 1005 patients with new-onset AF who were enrolled in the Fibrillation Registry Assessing Costs, Therapies, Adverse events, and Lifestyle (FRACTAL). Multivariable Cox regression models, including time-dependent covariates accounting for medication exposure, were used to evaluate the risk of pacemaker insertion associated with amiodarone use. RESULTS: Amiodarone use was associated with an increased risk of pacemaker insertion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.76) after adjustment for age, sex, atrial flutter, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension. The effect of amiodarone use was modified by sex, with a significant risk in women but not in men (HR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.99-11.05 vs HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.42-2.58 [P = .02]). This interaction remained significant after adjustment for weight, body mass index, weight-adjusted amiodarone dose, and use of other antiarrhythmic or rate control drugs. CONCLUSION: The risk of bradyarrhythmia requiring pacemaker insertion associated with amiodarone use for AF is significantly greater in women than in men, independent of weight or body mass index.

Effect of amiodarone dose on the risk of permanent pacemaker insertion.

Bradyarrhythmia requiring permanent pacemaker insertion has been associated with amiodarone use but the effect of amiodarone dose has not been investigated. In order to determine the effect of amiodarone dose on the risk of requiring permanent pacemaker insertion, a cohort of 15,824 subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior myocardial infarction was established. This study included 1,340 subjects who received a first prescription of amiodarone at > 65 years of age. Cox regression with daily dose and cumulative dose (weighted for recency of exposure) represented by time dependent covariates was performed, adjusting for baseline risk factors and time dependent exposure to other cardiac medications. The incidence of pacemaker insertion was 2.2% per person-year during a mean of 1.8 +/- 1.5 years of follow-up, and 5.2% per person-year during the first 90 days of amiodarone exposure. Amiodarone daily doses > 200 mg were associated with an increased risk during the entire follow-up HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0 to 4.1) as well as during the first 90 days (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 9.0). Cumulative doses greater than the equivalent of continuous therapy with 200 mg per day were also associated with an increased risk (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.5). Baseline conduction disorder or sinus node dysfunction was the only other significant predictor of pacemaker insertion. This study suggests that there is a dose dependent increased risk of permanent pacemaker insertion associated with amiodarone use that appears to be greatest during the initial months of treatment.

Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing.

The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) trial was a prospective, multicenter, single blind, randomized comparison of single chamber, rate adaptive, ventricular pacing (VVIR) with dual chamber, rate adaptive pacing (DDDR) in 407 patients aged > or =65 years(mean 76 +/- 7 years, 60% male)with standard bradycardia indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation. The incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) developing after pacemaker implantation in the PASE trial were studied prospectively. During a median follow-up of 18 months, AF developed in 73 (18%) patients. Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidences of AF in patients with sinus node dysfunction (n=176) at 18 months were 28% in the VVIR and 16% in the DDDR groups (P=0.08). After adjustment for other clinical variables using a Cox multivariate regression model, randomization to VVIR compared with DDDR pacing mode among patients with sinus node dysfunction was independently associated with a 2.6-fold increased relative risk (RR) of developing AF after pacemaker implantation (P=0.01). Other independent clinical risk factors for development of postimplant AF included a preimplant history of hypertension (P=0.02) or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias(P<0.04). Patients who developed AF had similar health related quality of life scores and cardiovascular functional status after 18 months of pacing as patients who remained free of AF. The RR of death, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization was not increased in patients who developed AF. Thus, in the elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction requiring permanent pacing, DDDR pacing mode protected against the development of AF. However, development of AF after pacemaker implantation in this population was not associated with a significant impact on quality-of-life, functional status, or other clinical endpoints during 18 months of follow-up.

Complications arising after implantation of DDD pacemakers: the MOST experience.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence, time course, frequency, and spectrum of acute and chronic complications arising from dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. This information may serve as a benchmark when comparing complication rates for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with those for biventricular pacemaker implantation.

Amiodarone and the risk of bradyarrhythmia requiring permanent pacemaker in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and prior myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of bradyarrhythmia requiring a permanent pacemaker. BACKGROUND: Reports of severe bradyarrhythmia during amiodarone therapy are infrequent and limited to studies assessing the therapy's use in the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: A study cohort of 8,770 patients age > or =65 years with a new diagnosis of AF was identified from a provincewide database of Quebec residents with a myocardial infarction (MI) between 1991 and 1999. Using a nested case-control design, 477 cases of bradyarrhythmia requiring a permanent pacemaker were matched (1:4) to 1,908 controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of pacemaker insertion associated with amiodarone use, controlling for baseline risk factors and exposure to sotalol, Class I antiarrhythmic agents, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and digoxin. RESULTS: amiodarone use was associated with an increased risk of pacemaker insertion (OR: 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30 to 3.54). This effect was modified by gender, with a greater risk in women versus men (OR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.70 to 8.75 vs. OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.80 to 2.89). Digoxin was the only other medication associated with an increased risk of pacemaker insertion (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of amiodarone in elderly patients with AF and a previous MI increases the risk of bradyarrhythmia requiring a permanent pacemaker. The finding of an augmented risk of pacemaker insertion in elderly women receiving amiodarone requires further investigation.

Single chamber ventricular compared with dual chamber pacing: a review.

Since its introduction in the 1950s, the cardiac pacemaker has become increasingly sophisticated in an attempt to mimic normal cardiac physiology. Rapidly evolving pacing technology has seen pacemakers evolve from crude, fixed-rate, single chamber ventricular devices to dual chamber rate-adaptive units. While there is indirect evidence that supports the use of dual chamber pacing in the vast majority of patients, it is still unclear whether these newer, more expensive devices afford a significant morbidity and mortality benefit over single-chamber, ventricular, rate-adaptive pacemakers. A review of three large, randomized trials failed to demonstrate a clear benefit of dual chamber or atrial-based pacing over single chamber ventricular pacing for the majority of cardiovascular outcomes (heart failure, stroke and mortality), with the possible exception of atrial fibrillation. Information is also needed on the potential protective effects of atrial-based pacing over dual chamber pacing in elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction. Longer follow-up periods may be necessary to determine whether there are any mortality benefits associated with dual chamber pacing. Additional confirmation of benefits of dual chamber pacing may be provided by other ongoing prospective trials.