Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Emerg Med J ; 33(5): 329-37, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26531861

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Designed to detect early deterioration of the hospitalised child, paediatric early warning scores (PEWS) validity in the emergency department (ED) is less validated. We aimed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of two commonly used PEWS (Brighton and COAST) in predicting hospital admission and, for the first time, significant illness. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of PEWS data for paediatric ED attendances at St Mary's Hospital, London, UK, in November 2012. Patients with missing data were excluded. Diagnoses were grouped: medical and surgical. To classify diagnoses as significant, established guidelines were used and, where not available, common agreement between three acute paediatricians. RESULTS: 1921 patients were analysed. There were 211 admissions (11%). 1630 attendances were medical (86%) and 273 (14%) surgical. Brighton and COAST PEWS performed similarly. hospital admission: PEWS of ≥3 was specific (93%) but poorly sensitive (32%). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was low at 0.690. Significant illness: for medical illness, PEWS ≥3 was highly specific (96%) but poorly sensitive (44%). The AUC was 0.754 and 0.755 for Brighton and COAST PEWS, respectively. Both scores performed poorly for predicting significant surgical illness (AUC 0.642). PEWS ≥3 performed well in predicting significant respiratory illness: sensitivity 75%, specificity 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Both Brighton and COAST PEWS scores performed similarly. A score of ≥3 has good specificity but poor sensitivity for predicting hospital admission and significant illness. Therefore, a high PEWS should be taken seriously but a low score is poor at ruling out the requirement for admission or serious underlying illness. PEWS was better at detecting significant medical illness compared with detecting the need for admission. PEWS performed poorly in detecting significant surgical illness. PEWS may be particularly useful in evaluating respiratory illness in a paediatric ED.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Early Diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Triage/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , London , Male , Pediatrics/methods , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Emerg Med J ; 27(7): 553-4, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20522437

ABSTRACT

For analgesia and sedation in the paediatric setting, intranasal medication is favourable for several reasons, in particular ease of administration and rapid onset of action. A survey was conducted of all Emergency Departments in England and Wales regarding their use of intranasal medication in children. Approximately 50% use intranasal medication, commonly intranasal diamorphine with sporadic use of other opiates. Intranasal midazolam is used for sedation but is less well tolerated than when administered orally. Intranasal diamorphine, however, is safe and effective in the management of pain in the paediatric emergency setting and its ease of administration makes it ideal for use in the already traumatised child.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Child , Conscious Sedation/methods , Drug Utilization Review , England , Health Surveys , Heroin/administration & dosage , Humans , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Wales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...