Double-bundle PCL and posterolateral corner reconstruction components are codominant.

A more complete biomechanical understanding of a combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner knee reconstruction may help surgeons develop uniformly accepted clinical surgical techniques that restore normal anatomy and protect the knee from premature arthritic changes. We identified the in situ force patterns of the individual components of a combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner knee reconstruction. We tested 10 human cadaveric knees using a robotic testing system by sequentially cutting and reconstructing the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load and 5-Nm external tibial torque. The posterior cruciate ligament was reconstructed with a double-bundle technique. The posterolateral corner reconstruction included reattaching the popliteus tendon to its femoral origin and reconstructing the popliteofibular ligament. The in situ forces in the anterolateral bundle were greater in the posterolateral corner-deficient state than in the posterolateral corner-reconstructed state at 30 degrees under the posterior tibial load and at 90 degrees under the external tibial torque. We observed no differences in the in situ forces between the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles under any loading condition. The popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament had similar in situ forces at all flexion angles. The data suggest the two bundles protect each other by functioning in a load-sharing, codominant fashion, with no component dominating at any flexion angle. We believe the findings support reconstructing both posterior cruciate ligament bundles and both posterolateral corner components.

Biomechanical analysis of a combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Failure to address both components of a combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injury has been implicated as a reason for abnormal biomechanics and inferior clinical results. HYPOTHESIS: Combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction restores the kinematics and in situ forces of the intact knee ligaments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic testing system through sequential cutting and reconstructing of the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load and a 5-N.m external tibial torque at multiple flexion angles. The double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using Achilles and semitendinosus tendons. The posterolateral corner reconstruction consisted of reattaching the popliteus tendon to its femoral origin and reconstructing the popliteofibular ligament with a gracilis tendon. RESULTS: Under the posterior load, the combined reconstruction reduced posterior translation to within 1.2 +/- 1.5 mm of the intact knee. The in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament grafts were significantly less than those in the native posterior cruciate ligament at all angles except full extension. Conversely, the forces in the posterolateral corner grafts were significantly higher than those in the native structures at all angles. Under the external torque with the combined reconstruction, external rotation as well as in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner grafts were not different from the intact knee. CONCLUSIONS: A combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction can restore intact knee kinematics at time zero. In situ forces in the intact posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner were not reproduced by the reconstruction; however, the posterolateral corner reconstruction reduced the loads experienced by the posterior cruciate ligament grafts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By addressing both structures of this combined injury, this technique restores native kinematics under the applied loads at fixed flexion angles and demonstrates load sharing among the grafts creating a potentially protective effect against early failure of the posterior cruciate ligament grafts but with increased force in the posterolateral corner construct.

Exchange reamed nailing for aseptic nonunion of the tibia.

BACKGROUND: Exchange reamed nailing of the tibia is a common procedure in the treatment of an aseptic tibial nonunion. However, reports in the literature supporting this technique are limited. METHODS: Forty patients with a tibial nonunion after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing were retrospectively assessed after an exchange reamed nailing. The main outcome measurements included radiographic and clinical union as well as time from exchange reamed nailing to union. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients achieved union of their fracture (95%). The average time from exchange nailing to union was 29 +/- 21 weeks. Complications included one deep vein thrombosis (2.5%) and two hardware failures (5%). CONCLUSION: Exchange reamed nailing for nonunions of the tibia results in a high union rate and is associated with a low complication rate. This technique is recommended as a standard procedure for aseptic tibial nonunions after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing.

A biomechanical analysis of two reconstructive approaches to the posterolateral corner of the knee.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the biceps femoris tenodesis and popliteofibular ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics. Ten human cadaveric knees were tested in the intact, posterolateral corner (PLC)-deficient, and PLC-reconstructed conditions using a robotic/universal force moment sensor testing system. The knees were subjected to: (1) a 134 N posterior tibial load, and (2) a 10 Nm external tibial torque applied to the tibia at full extension, 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. External tibial rotation of the intact knee ranged from 18.3+/-4.6 degrees at full extension to 27.9+/-4.6 degrees at 30 degrees under the 10 Nm external tibial torque. These values increased after sectioning the PLC by 2.8 degrees -7.5 degrees at 30 degrees and 90 degrees respectively. After the popliteofibular ligament reconstruction, external tibial rotation values were not significantly different from those for the intact knee at any angle tested, while values following the biceps tenodesis were as much as 5.7 degrees greater than the intact knee. Under the 134 N posterior tibial load, there were minimal decreases in posterior tibial translation of up to 0.9 mm with the biceps tenodesis and up to 1.6 mm with the popliteofibular ligament reconstruction compared to the intact knee. The in situ forces in the biceps tenodesis were not significantly different than the intact PLC at full extension or 30 degrees, while the in situ forces in the popliteofibular graft were not significantly different at any flexion angle. Our data suggests that by restoring external tibial rotation the popliteofibular ligament reconstruction more closely reproduces the primary function of the PLC as compared to the biceps tenodesis.