Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in healthy young volunteers.

Ertapenem (INVANZ) is a new once-a-day parenteral beta-lactam antimicrobial shown to be effective as a single agent for treatment of various community-acquired and mixed infections. The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ertapenem at doses up to 3 g were examined in healthy young men and women volunteers. Plasma and urine samples collected were analyzed using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Ertapenem is highly bound to plasma protein. The protein binding changes from approximately 95% bound at concentrations of <50 micro g/ml to approximately 92% bound at concentrations of 150 micro g/ml (concentration at the end of a 30-min infusion following the 1-g dose). The nonlinear protein binding of ertapenem resulted in a slightly less than dose proportional increase in the area under the curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )) of total ertapenem. The single-dose AUC(0- infinity ) of unbound ertapenem was nearly dose proportional over the dose range of 0.5 to 2 g. The mean concentration of ertapenem in plasma ranged from approximately 145 to 175 micro g/ml at the end of a 30-min infusion, from approximately 30 to 34 micro g/ml at 6 h, and from approximately 9 to 11 micro g/ml at 12 h. The mean plasma t(1/2) ranged from 3.8 to 4.4 h. About 45% of the plasma clearance (CL(P)) was via renal clearance. The remainder of the CL(P) was primarily via the formation of the beta-lactam ring-opened metabolite that was excreted in urine. There were no clinically significant differences between the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in men and women. Ertapenem does not accumulate after multiple once-daily dosing.

Single dose methodology to assess the influence of an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist on uroflowmetric parameters in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

AIMS: To establish methodology which rapidly and reliably assesses the effect of an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist on peak urine flow rates in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This methodology could then be applied to screening new drugs to treat BPH. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with BPH enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study. Patients were either withdrawn from their current alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy (n = 22) or were untreated prestudy (n = 3) and all met prespecified uroflowmetric criteria including: (1) a peak urine flow rate (Qmax) < 12 ml s-1 off therapy (or < 10 ml s-1 if untreated prestudy) and (2) a decrease in peak urine flow rate (Qmax) of > 2 ml s-1 after withdrawal from therapy. Study treatment consisted of tamsulosin 0.4 mg (or matching placebo) once daily for 8 days in a two-period crossover. Uroflowmetry was performed predose and once postdose (4.5-5.5 h postdose) on day 1, and once postdose (4.5-5.5 h postdose) on day 8 of each treatment period. RESULTS: After a single dose of tamsulosin, the least-square mean difference between tamsulosin and placebo in the change from baseline Qmax was 2.8 ml s-1 (P = 0.017 vs placebo). After 8 days dosing of tamsulosin, the least-square mean difference between tamsulosin and placebo in the change from baseline Qmax was also 2.8 ml s-1 (P = 0.044 vs placebo). Additionally, there was no significant difference observed between the single and multiple dose results (P > 0.200 for between group difference). CONCLUSIONS: Both single and multiple doses of tamsulosin 0.4 mg increased Qmax in men with BPH. A single dose produced a comparable response to multiple dose administration. The magnitude of the effect was greater than the effect generally seen in longer term clinical trials, but this difference may be explained by the patient population in this study which was preselected for 'responsiveness' to an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist. These results support the utility of single dose uroflowmetric measurements in rapidly providing preliminary data on new investigational agents, specifically agents which act to increase urine flow in men with BPH. However, clinical efficacy would still need to be confirmed with longer term clinical trials.

The effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacodynamics and pharmcokinetics of warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of 3 doses of rofecoxib (12.5, 25, and 50 mg) on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin. METHODS: Two single-dose (12.5 or 50 mg of rofecoxib with 25 mg or 30 mg of oral warfarin, respectively, on day 7 of each period) trials (N = 12 men) and 1 steady-state warfarin trial (25 mg rofecoxib; N = 15, 13 men and 2 women) were completed as two-period, randomized, balanced, crossover, double-blind designs. The prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) and S(-) and R(+) warfarin enantiomers were assessed during 144 hours after the single warfarin doses. In the steady-state warfarin trial, after the attainment of a stable INR (1.4-1.7), the stable warfarin dose was co-administered with rofecoxib (25 mg) and placebo over two 21-day periods. After the dose of warfarin on day 21, INR and S(-) and R(+) warfarin were assessed during 24 hours. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, rofecoxib slightly increased the INR by approximately 5% (90% confidence interval on the geometric ratio, 1.03, 1.08) and 11% (1.04, 1.19) for the two single-dose warfarin trials with 12.5 and 50 mg of rofecoxib, respectively. In the steady-state warfarin study with 25 mg of rofecoxib, the INR was increased by 8% (1.02, 1.15). Rofecoxib had no significant effect (versus placebo) on the pharmacokinetics of S(-) warfarin. However, in the 3 studies, treatment with 12.5, 25, and 50 mg of rofecoxib was associated with a 27%, 38%, and 40% increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib increased plasma concentrations of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin, which accounted for a small increase in INR. The approximately 8% increase in INR at steady state with warfarin co-administered with 25 mg of rofecoxib is not likely to be clinically important in most patients taking warfarin. However, standard monitoring of INR values should be conducted when therapy with rofecoxib is initiated or changed, particularly in the first few days, for patients receiving warfarin.

Montelukast dose selection in 6- to 14-year-olds: comparison of single-dose pharmacokinetics in children and adults.

Montelukast, an oral leukotriene-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults. A once-daily 10 mg dose (film-coated tablet) was selected as the optimal adult dose based on dose-ranging studies. Asthma is a similar disease and is treated with the same medications in children and adults. These observations suggested that a dose of montelukast in children providing overall drug exposure (i.e., montelukast plasma concentrations) similar to that of the 10 mg film-coated tablet dose in adults would be efficacious, well tolerated, and obviate the need for separate dose-ranging studies in children. Therefore, the dose of montelukast for 6- to 14-year-old children was selected by identifying the chewable tablet dose of montelukast yielding a single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) comparable to that achieved with the adult 10 mg film-coated tablet dose. Based on this approach, which included dose normalization of data from several pediatric pharmacokinetic studies, a 5 mg chewable tablet dose of montelukast was selected for use in clinical efficacy studies in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of montelukast sodium (MK-0476) in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

A study was conducted to (i) characterize the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of oral montelukast sodium (MK-0476), 10 mg d-1 in healthy young subjects (N = 12), (ii) evaluate the pharmacokinetics of montelukast in healthy elderly subjects (N = 12), and (iii) compare the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of montelukast between elderly and young subjects. Following oral administration of montelukast sodium, 10 mg d-1 (the therapeutic regimen for montelukast sodium) for 7 d, there was little difference in the plasma concentration-time profiles of montelukast in young subjects between day 1 and day 7 dosing. On average, trough plasma concentrations of montelukast were nearly constant, ranging from 18 to 24 ng mL-1 on days 3-7, indicating that the steady state of montelukast was attained on day 2. The mean accumulation ratio was 1.14, indicating that this dose regimen results in a 14% accumulation of montelukast. In elderly subjects, mean values of plasma clearance (Cl), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), plasma terminal half-life (t1/2), and mean residence time in the body (MRTIV) following a 7 mg intravenous (5 min infusion) administration of montelukast sodium in the elderly were 30.8 mL min-1, 9.7 L, 6.7 h, and 5.4 h, respectively. Following a 10 mg oral dose, the bioavailability of montelukast in healthy elderly averaged 61%, very close to that (62%) determined previously in healthy young subjects. Also following the 10 mg oral administration, the mean values of AUC0-->infinity, Cmax, tmax, and t1/2, and the mean plasma concentration-time profile of montelukast in the elderly, were generally similar to those in young subjects, indicating that age has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast. There is no need to modify dosage as a function of age.