Novel Therapies for Centralized Pain: a Brief Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Centralized pain presents a complex pathology that many classic pharmacological agents for pain have not been able to sufficiently treat. To date, there are no clear guidelines for preferred treatment methods or comprehensive protocol that addresses confounding factors in this population. We sought to summarize the current field of knowledge around centrally mediated pain and to understand promising novel therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Many treatments currently used address not only the centralized pain phenotypem but the impact of central sensitization and the common comorbidities that reside within this population. Some novel therapies with promising evidence include the following: low-dose naltrexone, IV ketamine, acupuncture, aerobic activity, and laser therapy. Non-interventional treatment options include aerobic exercise, cognitive-behavioral therapy, mind-body therapies, virtual reality, and patient education on disease expectations. Much of the literature further emphasizes the importance of patient-level predictors, including factors like pain catastrophizing and social history, on treatment compliance and reported pain relief. We found that there are many potential treatment options for patients with centralized pain, particularly those that can be used as adjunct or combination therapies. The introduction of new approaches should occur in a carefully controlled, titrated manner to avoid exacerbation of pain symptoms. This is successfully conducted through patient-physician communication as this is a highly complex and personalized pain category. Our examination shows that while physicians have many options with proven success, there is a need for studies with longitudinal and larger patient populations to better articulate treatment guidelines.

The Regenerative Potential of Therapeutic Ultrasound on Neural Tissue: A Pragmatic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Low-intensity ultrasound (LIU)/low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) may influence nerve tissue regeneration and axonal changes in the context of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and in the animal model. The purpose of this pragmatic review is to understand the current knowledge for the effects of low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound in the animal and human model and determine the future directions of this novel field. DESIGN: Pragmatic review. METHODS: We performed a literature search of available material using OVID, EmBase, and PubMed for LIU/LIPUS, all of which were preclinical trials, case reports, and case series using animal models. For CTS, a literature search was performed on PubMed (1954 to 2019), CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, 1970 to 2018), Web of Science (1954 to 2019), and SCOPUS (1954 to 2019) to retrieve randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Eight articles were discussed showing the potential effects of LIU on nerve regeneration in the animal model. Each of these trials demonstrated evidence of nerve regeneration in the animal model using LIPUS or LIU. Seven randomized controlled trials were reviewed for ultrasound effects for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, each showing clinical efficacy comparable to other treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: LIU/LIPUS is a promising and noninvasive means of facilitating nerve regeneration in the animal model and in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Although many of the trials included in this review are preclinical, each demonstrates promising outcomes that could eventually be extrapolated into human studies.

Regenerative Techniques for Neuraxial Back Pain: a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Regenerative modalities have been identified in numerous clinical studies as beneficial in various settings. The focus of this review is to summarize key studies and current concepts for the role of regenerative medicine in the treatment of neuraxial back pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of regenerative therapies for the treatment of neuraxial back pain. A literature review of clinical trials published between 2015 and 2017 was performed using OVID, PubMed, and Google Scholar to identify investigations attempting to determine the efficacy of various regenerative modalities on two primary sources of low back pain: facet arthropathy and degenerative disc disease. The seven articles analyzed in this systematic review present promising data regarding the use of these autologous biologic treatments, but many of these investigations have several limitations in common including small sample size. Regenerative medicine has been shown to demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of neuraxial back pain. As the field advances, new studies are needed comparing efficacy and safety profiles to better determine best practice techniques and standards in the future.

A patient navigation intervention for drug-involved former prison inmates.

BACKGROUND: Former prison inmates experience high rates of hospitalizations and death during the transition from prison to the community, particularly from drug-related causes and early after release. The authors designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patient navigation to reduce barriers to health care and hospitalizations for former prison inmates. METHODS: Forty former prison inmates with a history of drug involvement were recruited and randomized within 15 days after prison release. Participants were randomized to receive 3 months of patient navigation (PN) with facilitated enrollment into an indigent care discount program (intervention) or facilitated enrollment into an indigent care discount program alone (control). Structured interviews were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes were measured as a change in self-reported barriers to care and as the rate of health service use per 100 person-days. RESULTS: The mean number of reported barriers to care was reduced at 3 and 6 months in both groups. At 6 months, the rate of emergency department/urgent care visits per 100 person-days since baseline was 1.1 among intervention participants and 0.5 among control participants (P = .04), whereas the rate of hospitalizations per 100 person-days was 0.2 in intervention participants and 0.6 in control participants (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of former inmates into an RCT of patient navigation was highly feasible, but follow-up was limited by rearrests. Results suggest a significantly lower rate of hospitalizations among navigation participants, although the rate of emergency department/urgent care visits was not improved. Patient navigation is a promising, pragmatic intervention that may be effective at reducing high-cost health care utilization in former prison inmates.