Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 43: 224-228, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28601568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer cells can produce lactate in high concentrations. Two previous studies examined the clinical relevance of serum lactate as a biomarker in patients with brain tumors. Patients with high-grade tumors have higher serum concentrations of lactate than those with low-grade tumors. We hypothesized that serum lactic could be used of biomarker to predictor of survival in patients with glioblastoma (GB). METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Demographic, lactate concentrations and imaging data from 275 adult patients with primary GB was included in the analysis. The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared in patients who had above and below the median concentrations of lactate. We also investigated the correlation between lactate concentrations and tumor volume. Multivariate analyses were conducted to test the association lactate, tumor volume and demographic variables with PFS and OS. RESULTS: The median serum concentration of lactate was 2.3mmol/L. A weak correlation was found between lactate concentrations and tumor volume. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated similar survival in patients with higher or lower than 2.3mmol/L of lactate. The multivariate analysis indicated that the intraoperative levels of lactate were not independently associated with changes in survival. On another hand, a preoperative T1 volume was an independent predictor PFS (HR 95%CI: 1.41, 1.02-1.82, p=0.006) and OS (HR 95%CI: 1.47, 1.11-1.96, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that the serum concentrations of lactate cannot be used as a biomarker to predict survival after GB surgery. To date, there are no clinically available serum biomarkers to determine prognosis in patients with high-grade gliomas. These tumors may produce high levels of lactic acid. We hypothesized that serum lactic could be used of biomarker to predictor of survival in patients with glioblastoma (GB). In this study, we collected perioperative and survival data from 275 adult patients with primary high-grade gliomas to determine whether intraoperative serum acid lactic concentrations can serve as a marker of prognosis. The median serum concentration of lactate was 2.3mmol/L. Our analysis indicated the intraoperative levels of lactate were not independently associated with changes in survival. This retrospective study suggests that the serum concentrations of lactate cannot be used as a biomarker to predict survival after GB surgery.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Glioblastoma/surgery , Lactic Acid/blood , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Neurosurgical Procedures/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/blood , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Glioblastoma/blood , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 35: 82-87, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765559

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have examined the impact of anesthetics on cancer recurrence. Isoflurane but not desflurane has protumoral effects. We hypothesize the use of isoflurane but not desflurane during surgery for primary GBM is an independent predictor of disease progression and mortality. METHODS: 378 adult patients were included in the study. The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 1 and 5years were compared in patients who had either desflurane or isoflurane alone or in combination with propofol infusion. Multivariate analyses were conducted to test the association between preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative hyperglycemia with PFS and OS. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated similar survival in patients who had either desflurane or isoflurane. The use of a propofol infusion during surgery did not affect survival. Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, body mass index and the adjusted Charlson comorbidity score were associated with reduced survival. The multivariate analysis confirmed that age and BMI but not the type volatile anesthetic use were independent prognostic factors for PFS (HR, 95%CI: 1.07, 0.85-1.37, 9=0.531) and OS (HR, 95%CI: 1.13, 0.86-1.48, p=0.531). CONCLUSION: The use of isoflurane or desflurane during GBM surgery is not associated with reduced PFS or OS.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Glioblastoma/surgery , Isoflurane/analogs & derivatives , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Desflurane , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Hyperglycemia/complications , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...