Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 31(5): 1986-1993, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881148

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Portable ultrasonography (P-US) is increasingly used to diagnose syndesmotic instability. The aim of this study was to evaluate syndesmotic instability by measuring the distal tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) in a cadaveric model using P-US with progressive stages of syndesmotic ligamentous transection under external rotation stress. METHODS: Ten fresh lower leg cadaveric specimens amputated above the proximal tibiofibular joint were used. Using P-US, the TFCS was evaluated in the intact stage and after progressive sectioning of the (1) anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), (2) interosseous ligament (IOL), and (3) posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). The TFCS was measured in both the unstressed (0 Nm) state and with 4.5, 6.0, 7.5, and 9.0 Nm of external rotation stress using a bone hook placed on the first metatarsal bone at each stage of ligamentous transection stage using both P-US and fluoroscopy. RESULTS: When assessed with P-US, partial syndesmotic injury encompassing the AITFL and IOL resulted in significant TFCS widening at 4.5 Nm of external rotation torque when compared to intact state with a TFCS-opening of 2.6 ± 2 mm, p = 0.01. In contrast, no significant differences in TFCS were detected using fluoroscopy. Only a moderate correlation was found between P-US and fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: P-US is a useful tool in diagnosing syndesmotic instability during external rotation stress examination. TFCS-opening increased as additional ligaments of the syndesmosis were transected, and application of 4.5 Nm torque was sufficient to detect a difference of 2.6 mm after the IOL cut.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Joint Instability , Lateral Ligament, Ankle , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnosis , Lateral Ligament, Ankle/injuries , Ultrasonography , Cadaver
2.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(4): 1284-1293, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474612

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the bone healing, clinical, and return to daily activity outcomes after either surgical or conservative management of acute zone 1, 2, and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies published from the earliest record to January 2019 using EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. All articles assessing clinical outcomes of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures were included. Bone healing and clinical outcomes were thereafter calculated using a simplified pooling method. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles comprising of a total of 1,239 fractures were included, of which one was a randomized controlled trial, seven were prospective studies, and 24 were retrospective studies. 627 zone 1 fractures demonstrated union rates of 93.2% following conservative treatment and 95.1% following surgical treatment. Conservatively managed zone 1 fractures were displaced 49.5% of the time, compared to a rate of 92.8% for the surgically treated cases. For Jones' (zone 2) fractures, bone healing outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment showed union rates of 77.4% versus 96.3%, refracture rates of 2.4% versus 2.1%, and mean time to union of 11.0 weeks versus 9.4 weeks, respectively. Only ten proximal diaphyseal (zone 3) fractures were reported, with a mean return to work of 8.2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Acute zone 1 fractures are preferably treated conservatively as similar union rates were found after both conservative and surgical management. In contradistinction, acute zone 2 fractures demonstrate higher union rates and faster time to union when treated surgically. The outcomes of acute zone 3 fractures are rarely reported in the literature, so treatment recommendations remain unclear. Further research of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures is warranted to provide more definitive conclusions, but current findings can aid surgeons during the shared clinical decision making process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/therapy , Metatarsal Bones/injuries , Activities of Daily Living , Clinical Decision-Making , Conservative Treatment , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Metatarsal Bones/physiopathology , Metatarsal Bones/surgery
3.
Injury ; 51(11): 2703-2709, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741605

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Syndesmotic instability, when subtle, is challenging to diagnose and often requires visualization of the syndesmosis during applied stress. The primary aim was to assess normal distal tibiofibular motion in the sagittal plane using dynamic ultrasound under stress conditions. The secondary aim was to evaluate the reliability of dynamic stress ultrasonography. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants without history of ankle injury were included. Sagittal fibular translation was generated by applying a manual force to the fibula from anterior to posterior and from posterior to anterior. Distance between the ultrasound probe and the fibula was taken at two predefined points: 1) no force applied and, 2) during maximum force application. Each participant was scanned twice by two independent examiners, and each scan was analysed by two independent examiners. Three participants were scanned a second time by the same examiner who analysed these films twice to assess for intraobserver agreement. Means of exam 1 versus exam 2 were compared using a mixed linear model. Agreement among observers was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) interpreted as 0.4, poor; 0.4 〈 ICC < 0.59, acceptable; 0.6 < ICC < 0.74, good; ICC 〉 0.74, excellent. RESULTS: Fifty-six ankles were included in the study, including 16 (57%) males and 12 (42%) females. Average anterior to posterior fibular sagittal translation was 0.89 ± 0.6 mm and posterior to anterior fibular sagittal translation was 0.49 ± 1.1 mm. Anterior to posterior translation means of exam 1 versus exam 2 showed no significant differences, means of 0.81 mm [0.7-0.9] versus 0.77 mm [0.7-1.0], and posterior to anterior means [95% CI] of 0.42 mm [0.3-0.5] versus 0.44 mm [0.2-0.6] (p-values 0.416 and 0.758, respectively). Excellent Inter- and intraobserver agreement was found for all measurements taken. CONCLUSION: Dynamic ultrasound allows one to effectively and readily evaluate sagittal translation of the distal tibiofibular joint. It is able to afford bilateral comparisons, which becomes critical as the amount of syndesmotic instability approaches greater degrees of subtlety.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Joint Instability , Ankle Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fibula/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments, Articular , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...