ABSTRACT
AIM: We aimed to develop national reference values for birth weight, length, head circumference, and weight for length for newborn triplets based on data from the German perinatal survey of 2007-2011. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Perinatal survey data of 3,690 newborn triplets from all the states of Germany were kindly provided to us by the AQUA Institute in Göttingen, Germany. Data of 3,567 newborn triplets were included in the analyses. Sex-specific percentile values were calculated using cumulative frequencies. Percentile values at birth were computed for the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles for 21-36 completed weeks of gestation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We present the first German reference values (tables and curves) for the anthropometric dimensions of triplet neonates and compare selected birth weight and length percentiles of triplets (after 32 and 34 completed weeks of gestation) to those of singletons and twins. The differences in the 50th birth weight percentiles between singletons and triplets after 32 completed weeks of gestation were 180 g for girls and 210 g for boys; after 34 weeks of gestation the differences were 320 and 325 g, respectively. The differences between twins and triplets after 32 weeks of gestation were 100 g for girls and 120 g for boys; after 34 weeks of gestation they were 130 and 135 g, respectively. The data presented here enable the classification of newborn triplets according to somatic parameters making reference to German perinatal data.
Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Birth Weight , Body Height , Health Surveys , Reference Values , Triplets/classification , Triplets/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to develop new national standards for birth weight, length, head circumference, and weight for length for newborn twins based on the German perinatal survey of 2007-2011. We also assessed trends in anthropometric measurements by comparing these new percentile values with the percentile values of 1990-1994. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Perinatal survey data of 110,313 newborn twins from all the states of Germany collected in the years 2007-2011 were kindly provided by the AQUA Institute in Göttingen, Germany. Sex specific percentile values were calculated using cumulative frequencies. Percentile values at birth were computed for the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles for 21-40 completed weeks of gestation. Percentile curves and tabulated values for the years 2007-2011 were compared with the published values of 1990-1994. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The new percentile curves (2007-2011) closely resemble the previous ones (1990-1994). Small differences can nonetheless be found. For example, for birth weight the new values for the 10th percentile are a little higher. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using the new percentile values instead of the old ones.
Subject(s)
Anthropometry , Body Size/physiology , Health Care Surveys , Infant, Newborn/physiology , Twins/statistics & numerical data , Birth Weight/physiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to derive percentile values for birth weight, length, head circumference, and weight for length for singleton neonates based on the German perinatal survey of 2007-2011 (using data from all 16 states of Germany). We also compared these new percentile values with the percentile values of 1995-2000 that so far have been considered standard values. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 3 187 920 singleton neonates from the German perinatal survey of the years 2007-2011 were kindly provided to us by the AQUA Institute in Göttingen, Germany. Sex specific percentile values were calculated using cumulative frequencies. Percentile values at birth were computed for the 3(rd), 10(th), 25(th), 50(th), 75(th), 90(th), and 97(th) percentiles for 21-43 completed weeks of gestation. Percentile curves and tabulated values for the years 2007-2011 were compared with the published values of 1995-2000. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall the new percentile curves closely resemble the previous ones. Minimal differences can be found for the 10(th) percentile and generally for early weeks of gestation. Values for the 10(th) percentile in the 2007-2011 dataset are somewhat higher than values of 1995-2000 for birth weight, length, and weight for length. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of these new percentile values instead of the old ones.
Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Body Size/physiology , Infant, Newborn/physiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Data Collection , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Distribution , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
Background and Aim: We have previously presented analyses of data obtained from the German Perinatal Survey for the years 1995-1997. Here we present an analysis of data from the years 2007-2011 and compare the data to the previous data from the 1990s. Material and Methods: For the years 1995-1997, the data on 1â815â318 singleton pregnancies were provided by the Chambers of Physicians of all the states of Germany except Baden-Württemberg. For the years 2007-2011, the data on 3â187â920 singleton pregnancies from the German Perinatal Survey (all states of Germany) were obtained from the AQUA Institute in Göttingen, Germany. SPSS was used for data analysis. Plausibility checks were performed on the data. Results: Mean maternal age has increased over the years, from 28.7 years in 1995 to 30.2 years in 2011. We observed a decrease in smoking. While not all cases included data on maternal smoking after the pregnancy was known, when the cases with data on smoking were analysed, in 1995-1997 23.5â% of pregnant women were smokers compared to 11.2â% smokers in 2007-2011. Maternal body mass index (BMI) also changed; 8.2â% of women were obese (BMI: 30-40 kg/m2), while 13.0â% were obese in 2011. In 1995, 0.6â% of women were morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) compared to 1.8â% of women in 2011. The mean maternal body weight at the time of the first obstetric consultation also increased from 65.9 kg in 1995 to 68.7 kg in 2011. Conclusions: While the decrease in the number of women smoking over time is clearly a positive development, increasing maternal age and obesity present challenges in clinical practice.
