ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Contemporary data regarding the characteristics, treatment and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are needed. We aimed to assess these data and guideline adherence in the EURObservational Research Programme on Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) long-term general registry. METHODS: We analysed 967 patients from the EORP-AF long-term general registry included in the Netherlands and Belgium from 2013 to 2016. Baseline and 1year follow-up data were gathered. RESULTS: At baseline, 887 patients (92%) received anticoagulant treatment. In 88 (10%) of these patients, no indication for chronic anticoagulant treatment was present. A rhythm intervention was performed or planned in 52 of these patients, meaning that the remaining 36 (41%) were anticoagulated without indication. Forty patients were not anticoagulated, even though they had an indication for chronic anticoagulation. Additionally, 63 of the 371 patients (17%) treated with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) were incorrectly dosed. In total, 50 patients (5%) were overtreated and 89 patients (9%) were undertreated. However, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was still low with 4.2% (37 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Overtreatment and undertreatment with anticoagulants are still observable in 14% of this contemporary, West-European AF population. Still, MACCE occurred in only 4% of the patients after 1 year of follow-up.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) does not terminate spontaneously and may cause left ventricular dysfunction and thromboembolic complications. For restoration of sinus rhythm electrical cardioversion (ECV) is most effective. However, AF frequently relapses, necessitating re-ECV and institution of potentially harmful antiarrhythmic drugs. If AF is accepted, rate control and prevention of thromboembolic complications using negative chronotropic drugs and warfarin is pursued. It is our hypothesis that rate control therapy is not inferior to ECV therapy in preventing morbidity and mortality. METHODS: RACE (RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation) is a randomised comparison of serial ECV therapy (repeat ECV as soon as possible after a relapse and institution of an antiarrhythmic drug: sotalol, class IC drug and amiodarone) and rate control therapy (resting heart rate <100 bpm using digitalis, calcium channel blockers and/or ß-blockers) in patients with persistent AF. Morbidity (heart failure, side effects of drugs, thromboembolic complications, bleeding and pacemaker implantation), mortality, quality of life and cost-effectiveness are primary and secondary endpoints. Included are patients with a recurrence of persistent AF, present episode <1 year and a maximum of two previous successful ECVs during the last two years. This study is a multicentre study in 31 centres throughout the Netherlands. All 520 patients have now been included. Follow-up is two years. The results are expected this year.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Development of de novo malignancies emerges as a serious long term complication after liver transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 174 adult one-year survivors for de novo malignancies. The observed cancer rates were compared with the expected cancer rates in the Dutch population. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 174 patients developed 23 malignancies (12%). Skin and lip cancer accounted for 12 of the 23 malignancies (52%). Only one patient had a B-cell lymphoma. The cumulative risk for de novo malignancy was 6, 20, and 55% at 5, 10, and 15 years after transplantation, respectively. The overall relative risk (RR) as compared with the general population was 4.3 (95% confidence interval 2.4-7.1). Significantly increased RRs were observed for non-melanoma skin cancer (RR 70.0), non-skin solid cancer (RR 2.7), renal cell cancer (RR 30.0), and colon cancer (RR 12.5). Multivariate analysis showed that an age > 40 years and pretransplant use of immunosuppression were significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: An increased risk of cancer exists after liver transplantation, for both for skin/lip cancer, and other solid tumors. Older age and the use of immunosuppression are risk factors.
