Phase 2 study of add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: final results.

ABSTRACT: Ruxolitinib reduces spleen volume, improves symptoms, and increases survival in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. However, suboptimal response may occur, potentially because of signaling via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B pathway. This phase 2 study evaluated dosing, efficacy, and safety of add-on PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. Eligible patients remained on a stable ruxolitinib dose and received add-on parsaclisib 10 or 20 mg, once daily for 8 weeks, and once weekly thereafter (daily-to-weekly dosing; n = 32); or parsaclisib 5 or 20 mg, once daily for 8 weeks, then 5 mg once daily thereafter (all-daily dosing; n = 42). Proportion of patients achieving a ≥10% decrease in spleen volume at 12 weeks was 28% for daily-to-weekly dosing and 59.5% for all-daily dosing. Proportions of patients achieving ≥50% decrease at week 12 in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form symptom scores were 14% and 18% for daily-to-weekly dosing, and 28% and 32% for all-daily dosing, respectively. Most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (23%), diarrhea (22%), abdominal pain and fatigue (each 19%), and cough and dyspnea (each 18%). New-onset grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were observed in 19% of patients, each dosed daily-to-weekly, and in 26% and 7% of patients dosed all-daily, respectively, managed with dose interruptions. Hemoglobin levels remained steady. The addition of parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib can reduce splenomegaly and improve symptoms, with manageable toxicity in patients with myelofibrosis with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02718300.

A Rare Presentation of a Non-Asian Female With Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR L747P Mutation With Clinical Response to Multi-targeted Epigenetic and EGFR Inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been utilized to predict the effectiveness of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The most common EGFR mutations are exon 19 deletion and exon 21-point mutation, which are sensitive to EGFR TKI. However, rare/complex EGFR mutations still exist, data of which are scarce and controversial. Hence, their role in response to standard therapy remains uncertain. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a patient diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma for whom standard chemotherapies, including platinum agents, had failed. The patient was found to have an EGFR exon 19 (L747P) mutation, as evident in her liquid biopsy. This alteration has not been described before in the literature on non-Asian females. Data from the current case study highlight the aggressive nature of this type of EGFR mutation as indicated by the complete resistance to erlotinib. Using standard first-generation EGFR inhibitors in treating this point mutation was considered inadequate. However, this patient showed a substantial response when treated with erlotinib combined with epigenetic therapies, consisting of DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors. For more than 8 years, the patient has been responding to combination therapy with a normal quality of life. CONCLUSION: This case represents a possible novel approach to reducing resistance in patients harboring this rare EGFR mutation which may translate to better outcomes.

Chromatographic capture of cells to achieve single stage clarification in recombinant protein purification.

Recent advancements in cell culture engineering have allowed drug manufacturers to achieve higher productivity by driving higher product titers through cell line engineering and high-cell densities. However, these advancements have shifted the burden to clarification and downstream processing where the difficulties now revolve around removing higher levels of process- and product-related impurities. As a result, a lot of research efforts have turned to developing new approaches and technologies or process optimization to still deliver high quality biological products while controlling cost of goods. Here, we explored the impact of a novel single use technology employing chromatographic principle-based clarification for a process-intensified cell line technology. In this study, a 16% economic benefit ($/g) was observed using a single-use chromatographic clarification compared to traditional single-use clarification technology by improving the overall product cost through decreased operational complexity, higher loading capacity, increased product recovery, and higher impurity clearance. In the end, the described novel chromatographic approach significantly simplified and enhanced the cell culture fluid harvest unit operation by combining the reduction of insoluble and key soluble contaminants of the harvest fluid into a single stage.

An open-label, dose-ranging study of Rolontis, a novel long-acting myeloid growth factor, in breast cancer.

This randomized, open-label, active-controlled study investigated the safety and efficacy of three doses of Rolontis (eflapegrastim), a novel, long-acting myeloid growth factor, versus pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients being treated with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC). The primary efficacy endpoint was duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during the first cycle of treatment. Patients who were candidates for adjuvant/neoadjuvant TC chemotherapy were eligible for participation. TC was administered on Day 1, followed by 45, 135, or 270 µg/kg Rolontis or 6 mg pegfilgrastim on Day 2. Complete blood counts were monitored daily when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) fell to <1.5 × 109 /L. Up to four cycles of TC were investigated. The difference in DSN (time from ANC <0.5 × 109 /L to ANC recovery ≥2.0 × 109 /L) between the Rolontis and pegfilgrastim groups was -0.28 days (confidence interval [CI]: -0.56, -0.06) at 270 µg/kg, 0.14 days (CI: -0.28, 0.64) at 135 µg/kg, and 0.72 days (CI: 0.19, 1.27) at 45 µg/kg. Noninferiority to pegfilgrastim was demonstrated at 135 µg/kg (P = 0.002) and 270 µg/kg (P < .001), with superiority demonstrated at 270 µg/kg (0.03 days; P = 0.023). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were bone pain, myalgia, arthralgia, back pain, and elevated white blood cell counts, with similar incidences across groups. All doses of Rolontis were well tolerated, and no new or significant treatment-related toxicities were observed. In Cycle 1, Rolontis demonstrated noninferiority at the 135 µg/kg dose and statistical superiority in DSN at the 270 µg/kg dose when compared to pegfilgrastim.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in taxane-pretreated, HER2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the best use of the available therapeutic agents is unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with bevacizumab and gemcitabine. PATIENTS: Women who were to undergo first-line treatment for locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were eligible. Patients must have received a taxane-containing regimen in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting with a ≥ 12-month disease-free interval. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase II trial. On day 1 of each 14-day cycle, patients received gemcitabine (2500 mg/m(2)) followed by bevacizumab (10 mg/kg). Patients were treated until complete response, progressive disease (PD), or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Fifty-two women were enrolled and treated. The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.6), the 1-year overall survival rate was 68.7% (95% CI, 54.1%-79.5%), and the response rate was 21.4% (95% CI, 10.3%-36.8%). The clinical benefit rate was 35.7%. The median PFS in the triple-negative (n = 19) and non-triple-negative (n = 33) subsets was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.7-11.7) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-8.1), respectively. The most common (all grades) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (51.9%), fatigue (46.2%), decreased appetite (25.0%), and anemia (25.0%). The most common grade 3 or grade 4 drug-related AEs were neutropenia (13.5%), leukopenia (11.5%), and hypertension (7.7%). CONCLUSION: Although the gemcitabine-bevacizumab doublet appears active, the median PFS was lower than expected. There were no unexpected safety signals at this dose and schedule of this combination.

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine repeating doublet therapy in recurrent breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine, widely used in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancers, has also been used in breast cancer. This trial examined the efficacy and toxicity of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease, recurrent after adjuvant and < or = 1 previous treatment for systemic disease, received carboplatin area under the curve = 2.0 (Calvert) plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, both drugs administered days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of 15 patients accrued, 13 are fully evaluable. RESULTS: There were 2 complete (13.3%) and 6 partial (40%) responses, for an overall response rate by intention to treat of 53.3% (95% CI, 28%-82%). The median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.03-6.97 months), and median overall survival was 28.8 months (95% CI, 9.4-48.2 months). There were 2 patients with grade 3 (13.3%) anemia, 7 patients with grade 3 (46.6%) and 4 patients (26.6%) with grade 4 neutropenia, 4 patients with grade 3 (26.6%) and 3 patients (20%) with grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The repeating doublet of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine reveals activity comparable to that of cisplatin plus gemcitabine, is well tolerated, and warrants evaluation in patients with recurrent breast cancer.