Contemporary outcomes for resected type 1-3 gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for tumors of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). However, contemporary analyses of the Western experience for GEJ adenocarcinoma are sparsely reported. METHODS: Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma undergoing resection between 2012 and 2022 at a single institution were grouped based on Siewert subtype and analyzed. Pathologic and treatment related variables were assessed with relation to outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients underwent resection: 161 (53.3%) with type I, 116 (38.4%) with type II, and 25 (8.3%) with type III tumors. Most patients received neoadjuvant therapy (86.4%); 86% of cases were performed in a minimally invasive fashion. Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.0% and 30-day mortality in only 0.7%. The rate of grade 3+ morbidity was lower for the last 5 years of the study than for the first 5 years (27.5% vs 49.3%, P < .001), as was median length of stay (7 vs 8 days, P < .001). There was a significantly greater number of signet ring type tumors among type III tumors (44.0%) than type I/II tumors (11.2/12.9%, P < .001). Otherwise, there was no difference in the distribution of pathologic features among Siewert subtypes. Notably, there was a significant difference in 3-year overall survival based on Siewert classification: type I 60.0%, type II 77.2%, and type III 86.3% (P = .011). Siewert type I remained independently associated with worse survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 4.5; P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, single-institutional series, operative outcomes for patients with resected GEJ adenocarcinoma improved over time. On multivariable analysis, type I tumors were an independent predictor of poor survival.

Biology of Mesothelin and Clinical Implications: A Review of Existing Literature.

Since its discovery in 1992, mesothelin (MSLN) has generated significant interest as a therapeutic target. A number of characteristics make it ideal for this purpose. First, it is not expressed on the parenchyma of any vital organs. Second, it is differentially expressed on a number of cancer types that have relatively poor prognosis and lack effective systemic options. Third, it is expressed on the cell membrane making it accessible to large molecule targeted therapies. However, unlike other drug targets that have been exploited for therapeutic benefit, the precise function of MSLN, why it is expressed in certain cancers, and its biological role have not been clearly elucidated. Here the existing literature on the cellular function and expression patterns of MSLN across tumor types is reviewed in order to gain further understanding of this intriguing molecule. In doing so, we conclude that there remains significant ambiguity surrounding its function and role in cellular and tumor biology. Furthermore, the expression of MSLN and its relation of prognosis seems to depend on the type of tumor. Finally, the unified mechanism by which MSLN acts as a protein that conveys tumor aggressiveness remains elusive. What is clear is that there is much yet to be discovered in this realm and doing so may have large implications for treatment of otherwise lethal malignancies.

High Mesothelin expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is associated with aggressive tumor features but not prognosis.

Mesothelin is a cell surface marker expressed on most pancreatic cancers and has been associated with aggressive biology. Despite its popularity as a drug target, clinical relevance of Mesothelin expression in pancreatic cancer is unclear. We set out to define transcriptomic signatures associated with high Mesothelin expression and identify its role in tumor biology and its clinical relevance. We analyzed pancreatic adenocarcinomas in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA), (n = 145) and the results were validated using GSE62452 cohort (n = 69). We divided the cohorts into high and low Mesothelin expression by the median. High Mesothelin was not associated with progression-free, disease-free, disease specific, nor overall survival in TCGA cohort. Despite this, high Mesothelin expression was associated with high Ki67 expression and enriched all five cell proliferation-related Hallmark gene sets, but not with previously investigated pathways: TNF-alpha, PI3K, nor angiogenesis. Mesothelin expression did not correlate with MUC16 expression. The high Mesothelin pancreatic cancers demonstrated higher homologous recombination deficiency, fraction altered, and silent and non-silent mutation rates (all P < 0.001) that indicate aggressive cancer biology. However, lymphocyte infiltration score, TIL regional fraction, TCR richness, infiltration of CD8 T-cells, and cytolytic activity were all significantly lower in Mesothelin high tumors (all P < 0.015). Finally, we found that Mesothelin expression significantly correlated with sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer cell lines. In conclusion, high Mesothelin expression is associated with enhanced proliferation, depressed immune response, and sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy, which may explain there was no difference in survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Age Determines Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Resected Stage II Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Treatment recommendations rely largely on the presence of certain high-risk features for recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We sought to define patient and clinicopathologic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer and determine whether these differences impact treatment. We hypothesized that high-risk features in stage II colorectal cancer differed between age groups and would most strongly influence administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a Commission on Cancer designated hospital as well as the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program. PATIENTS: Patients with resected stage II colon cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Patients were stratified into young (≤45), middle-aged (50-75), and older (>75) age groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of high-risk clinicopathologic features and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were measured. RESULTS: A total of 14,966 patients met inclusion criteria. Young patients were found to have had at least one high-risk feature ( n = 489, 44%) slightly more often than both middle-aged ( n = 3734, 40%) and older patients ( n = 1890, 42%). A total of 332 (7%) older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 627 (56%) young patients and 2854 (30%) middle-aged patients. Age group was independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy when controlling for relevant clinicopathologic factors. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study without granular detail on treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients are frequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy for both high- and low-risk tumors despite questionable benefit in the latter. Older patients rarely receive adjuvant therapy. Both medical and surgical oncologists should be aware of disparities in cancer treatment and remain conscientious about making treatment decisions solely based on age. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . LA EDAD DETERMINA EL USO DE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN EL CNCER DE COLON RESECADO EN ESTADIO II: ANTECEDENTES:El papel de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II sigue siendo controversial . Las recobmendaciones para el tratamiento dependen en gran medida de la presencia de ciertas características de alto riesgo de recurrencia.OBJETIVO:Buscamos definir las diferencias clínico-patológicas del paciente entre el CCR de inicio temprano y tardío; y determinar si estas diferencias afectan el tratamiento. Hipotetizamos que las características de alto riesgo del cáncer colorrectal en estadio II difieren entre los grupos de edad y que influyen fuertemente en la administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital designado por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer, así como el Programa de Investigación Intramural del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron los pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II en la Base de datos nacional del cáncer y se registraron las características clínico-patológicas. Los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de edad jóvenes (≤45), de mediana edad (50-75) y mayores (> 75).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron la incidencia de las características clínico-patológicas de alto riesgo y la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.RESULTADOS:Un total de 14.966 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontró que los pacientes jóvenes tenían al menos una característica de alto riesgo (n = 489, 44%) un poco más frecuente que los pacientes de mediana edad (n = 3734, 40%) y los pacientes mayores (n = 1890, 42%). Un total de 332 (7%) de los pacientes mayores recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante en comparación con 627 (56%) de los pacientes jóvenes y 2854 (30%) de los pacientes de mediana edad. El grupo de edad se asoció de forma independiente con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante al controlar los factores clínico-patológicos relevantes.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo sin detalles granulares sobre las decisiones de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:A los pacientes jóvenes se les prescribe con frecuencia quimioterapia adyuvante para tumores de alto y bajo riesgo, a pesar de los cuestionables beneficios en estos últimos. Los pacientes de edad avanzada rara vez reciben terapia adyuvante. Tanto los oncólogos clínicos como los quirúrgicos deben ser conscientes de las disparidades en el tratamiento del cáncer y ser conscientes de tomar decisiones de tratamiento basadas únicamente en la edad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) presents a therapeutic dilemma, particularly as it often involves adjacent organs through desmoplasia or true pathologic invasion. To obtain a margin-negative resection, these tumors require en bloc gastrectomy with multivisceral resection (G+MVR), and contention remains regarding its safety and oncologic benefit. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to retrospectively evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with LAGC treated in the USA between 2004 and 2016. Associations with margin status and perioperative outcomes were calculated using logistic regression. Survival was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 785 pathologic stage T4b (pT4b) patients diagnosed with LAGC underwent gastrectomy (n = 438) or G+MVR (n = 347). There was no association between G+MVR and short- or long-term mortality. Positive resection margins (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.40-2.03), the presence of nodal disease (HRs 1.46-1.50), treatment at a high-volume center (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85), and the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80) were independently associated with overall survival. Diffuse-type histology was associated with higher rates of an R1 resection (OR 3.60, 95% CI 2.20-5.87). Perioperative and long-term survival metrics were comparable between patients with pT4a and pT4b LAGC who underwent a margin-negative G+MVR. Undergoing a margin-negative G+MVR imparted a 6-month survival benefit over non-curative gastrectomy alone (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the safety and long-term feasibility of G+MVR for disease clearance in well-selected patients with LAGC, and we advocate for their referral to high-volume centers for optimal care.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland metastasizing to the pericardium and diaphragm: Report of a rare case.

BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is an uncommon malignancy of the salivary gland characterized by slow growth, increased risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. The annual incidence in the United States is approximately 1200 cases per year and rarely involves the body cavities. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 48-year-old male diagnosed with AdCC of the left submandibular gland. He received his last chemotherapy in 2006 and presented with pleural metastasis. After undergoing pleurectomy and decortication procedure, pericardial fluid and biopsies from the chest wall, sixth rib, diaphragm, pleural cavity and pericardium were sent for pathologic evaluation. A diagnosis of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma was confirmed, including in the pericardium, pericardial fluid and diaphragm. CONCLUSION: AdCC of the submandibular gland is a malignant tumor with a high mortality rate. It is very rare for AdCC to metastasize to the pericardium and diaphragm. Metastasis to uncommon sites such as seen in our case with metastases to the pericardium and diaphragm shows the aggressive and unpredictable nature of this tumor, requiring close follow up, and indicating the need for molecular profile analysis and biomarker-stratified clinical trials.

Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in pT1-T3 gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most gallbladder cancers are diagnosed after cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease, and nodal staging to inform subsequent treatment is therefore often lacking. We evaluated the association of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) with regional lymph node involvement in gallbladder adenocarcinoma and its impact on survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma and with available staging and LVI status. Patients with pT4 and M1 disease were excluded. Univariable and multivariable regression identified factors associated with positive lymph nodes. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 1649 patients with available LVI status, 1142 (69.7%) had at least one positive lymph node and 765 (46.4%) had LVI. On multivariable regression, presence of LVI was the strongest predictor of positive lymph nodes (odds ratio, 3.69; P < .001). The positive predictive value of LVI for positive lymph nodes in pT2 and pT3 tumors was 80.1% and 90.5%, respectively. LVI was independently associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio, 1.21; P = .001), as were node-positive disease and increasing T stage. CONCLUSION: In patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma, LVI is independently associated with regional lymph node metastases and abbreviated OS. LVI status may help risk-stratify patients following initial cholecystectomy and inform subsequent treatment.

Characterization of alveolar soft part sarcoma using a large national database.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar soft part sarcoma is a rare, histologic subtype of soft tissue sarcoma that remains poorly defined. We aimed to describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns and to examine factors associated with survival for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma. METHODS: After identifying patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma in the National Cancer Database, we recorded their clinicopathologic characteristics. Univariable log-rank survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were employed. For context, survival comparisons were included for patients with other sarcoma subtypes. RESULTS: Overall, 293 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma were identified. Interestingly, patients with head and neck tumors were least likely to present with distant disease (40%, P = .025). The majority of patients underwent resection (n = 183, 63%). Among those, no predictors of lesser survival were identified other than the presence of metastases (hazard ratio 6.04, P ≤ .001). Patients with stage IV alveolar soft part sarcoma who underwent resections experienced improved survival relative to similar patients with more common subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Alveolar soft part sarcoma is exceedingly rare, and patients often present with metastases. Primary tumors can occur anywhere in the body, and location impacts the rates of metastases at presentation. Resection is associated with a favorable survival advantage when compared to other, more common histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas.

Mesothelin-Targeted Recombinant Immunotoxins for Solid Tumors.

Mesothelin (MSLN) is a cell surface glycoprotein normally expressed only on serosal surfaces, and not found in the parenchyma of vital organs. Many solid tumors also express MSLN, including mesothelioma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Due to this favorable expression profile, MSLN represents a viable target for directed anti-neoplastic therapies, such as recombinant immunotoxins (iToxs). Pre-clinical testing of MSLN-targeted iTox's has yielded a strong body of evidence for activity against a number of solid tumors. This has led to multiple clinical trials, testing the safety and efficacy of the clinical leads SS1P and LMB-100. While promising clinical results have been observed, neutralizing anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation presents a major challenge to overcome in the therapeutic development process. Additionally, on-target, off-tumor toxicity from serositis and non-specific capillary leak syndrome (CLS) also limits the dose, and therefore, impact anti-tumor activity. This review summarizes existing pre-clinical and clinical data on MSLN-targeted iTox's. In addition, we address the potential future directions of research to enhance the activity of these anti-tumor agents.