Asthma-COPD overlap in World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees, 2015-2016.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is a newly redefined form of chronic airway disease and has not been well studied among 9/11-exposed populations with increased prevalence of asthma. We assessed the prevalence and risk factors associated with ACO in an exposure cohort of World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR) enrollees. METHODS: This is a longitudinal study, including enrollees with complete data on 9/11/01 exposure at enrollment (2003-2004, Wave 1), asthma and COPD diagnoses and at least 25 years of age at the time of the 2015-2016 (Wave 4) WTCHR survey. Probable ACO was defined as self-reported post-9/11 physician-diagnosed asthma and either emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or COPD. We evaluated whether probable ACO was associated with World Trade Center (WTC)-related exposures, using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 36,864 Wave 4 participants, 29,911 were eligible for this analysis, and 1,495 (5.0%) had self-reported post-9/11 probable ACO. After adjusting for demographics and smoking status, we found 38% increased odds of having ACO in enrollees with exposure to the dust cloud, and up to 3.39 times the odds in those with ≥3 injuries sustained on 9/11. Among rescue/recovery workers, ever working on the pile, on the pile on 9/11 or 9/12/01, or working on the WTC site for >7 days showed increased odds ratios of having ACO. CONCLUSION: Probable ACO is associated with WTC exposures. Further study of ACO is needed to understand the development of this and other environmentally or occupationally-related airway diseases, and how to prevent these in disasters like 9/11.

Effects of routine monitoring of delirium in a surgical/trauma intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is prevalent in surgical and trauma intensive care units (ICUs) and carries substantial morbidity. This study tested the hypothesis that daily administration of a diagnostic instrument for delirium in a surgical/trauma ICU decreases the time of institution of pharmacologic therapy and improves related outcomes. METHODS: Controlled trial of two concurrent groups. The Confusion-Assessment Method for ICU was administered daily to all eligible patients admitted to our surgical/trauma ICU for 48 hours or longer. The result was communicated to one of the two preexisting ICU services (intervention service) and not the other (control service). Primary outcome was the time between diagnosis of delirium and pharmacologic treatment. Secondary outcomes included duration of delirium, mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay. RESULTS: Delirium occurred in 98 (35%) of 283 consecutive patients. Time between diagnosis and therapy did not differ between intervention (35 [35] hours) and control (40 [41] hours) groups. There was a difference in the number of delirium days treated in the intervention (73%) versus control (64%) groups (p = 0.035). The intervention group had significantly lower odds to neglect treating delirium when delirium was present (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.00; p = 0.05). In the subgroup of trauma patients, the odds ratio of negligence was 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.99; p = 0.048), indicating lower probability for trauma patients to be untreated. There was no difference in the average duration of delirium, mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay. CONCLUSION: In our surgical/trauma ICU, daily screening for delirium did not affect the timing of pharmacologic therapy. Although the intervention resulted in a higher number of delirious ICU patients being treated, particularly trauma patients, there was no effect on related outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.