Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 23(7): 1917-24, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24705791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability of intraarticular landmark identification for tunnel position calculation in image-free anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) navigation. METHODS: In a test/retest scenario, thirteen experienced ACL surgeons (>50 reconstructions year) experienced in image-free ACL navigation were asked to identify the landmarks required for image-free ACL navigation in the same cadaver knee. Landmark positions were registered using a fluoroscopic ACL navigation system. Positions were determined using validated radiological measurement methods. For variability analysis, mean positions, deviations between the test/retest positions, standard deviations (SD) and range were calculated. RESULTS: Interobserver analysis showed a mean variability (SD) for the tibial landmark positions of 3.0 mm with deviations of up to 24.3 mm (range). Mean femoral landmark variability was 2.9 mm (SD) with deviations of up to 11.3 mm (range). Intraobserver analysis showed a tibial reproducibility of 2.2 mm (SD 2.0 mm; range 10.9 mm) and a femoral of 1.9 mm (SD 1.9 mm; range 10.4 mm). CONCLUSION: The data of the presented study suggest that a considerable inter- and intraobserver variability in intraarticular landmark identification exists. Reasonable ranges were found that have to be considered as a potential risk for miscalculation of tunnel positions in image-free ACL reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Landmark acquisition affects tunnel calculation in image-free ACL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femur/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Tibia/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Cadaver , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Tibia/diagnostic imaging
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 134(10): 1429-36, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25005314

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since tunnel positioning is one of the key factors in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the variability of tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction has so far never been analyzed, the objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer variability of tibial and femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an operating room setup, 13 surgeons were asked to identify the tunnel positions in one and the same ACL-deficient cadaver knee. Using a fluoroscopic based ACL navigation system, tunnel positions were digitally measured in a test/re-test scenario. For variability analysis mean positions, standard deviations and range were calculated as well as differences between test/re-test positions. RESULTS: The intraobserver analysis showed a tibial variability of 3.3 mm (SD 2.1, range 7.5 mm) and a femoral variability of 2.0 mm (SD 1.6 mm, range 6.8 mm). The interobserver variability of the tibial tunnel positions was 3.2 mm (SD) with a range of 18.3 mm and a femoral variability of 3.7 mm (SD) with a range of 13.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a reasonable inter- and intra-observer variability in ACL tunnel positioning exists even among experienced surgeons. Although deviations of 2-3 mm may seem to be acceptable at first sight, a range of up to 18.3 mm indicates that outliers exist, which can cause graft failure. More reliable reconstruction techniques should be developed to reduce the variability in tunnel positioning.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femur/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tibia/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Humans , Knee Injuries/surgery , Observer Variation
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 13: 33, 2012 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22405047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fracture-healing depends on interfragmentary motion. For improved osteosynthesis and fracture-healing, the micromotion between fracture fragments is undergoing intensive research. The detection of 3D micromotions at the fracture gap still presents a challenge for conventional tactile measurement systems. Optical measurement systems may be easier to use than conventional systems, but, as yet, cannot guarantee accuracy. The purpose of this study was to validate the optical measurement system PONTOS 5M for use in biomechanical research, including measurement of micromotion. METHODS: A standardized transverse fracture model was created to detect interfragmentary motions under axial loadings of up to 200 N. Measurements were performed using the optical measurement system and compared with a conventional high-accuracy tactile system consisting of 3 standard digital dial indicators (1 µm resolution; 5 µm error limit). RESULTS: We found that the deviation in the mean average motion detection between the systems was at most 5.3 µm, indicating that detection of micromotion was possible with the optical measurement system. Furthermore, we could show two considerable advantages while using the optical measurement system. Only with the optical system interfragmentary motion could be analyzed directly at the fracture gap. Furthermore, the calibration of the optical system could be performed faster, safer and easier than that of the tactile system. CONCLUSION: The PONTOS 5 M optical measurement system appears to be a favorable alternative to previously used tactile measurement systems for biomechanical applications. Easy handling, combined with a high accuracy for 3D detection of micromotions (≤ 5 µm), suggests the likelihood of high user acceptance. This study was performed in the context of the deployment of a new implant (dynamic locking screw; Synthes, Oberdorf, Switzerland).


Subject(s)
Bone Substitutes/chemistry , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Anatomic , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Biomechanical Phenomena , Calibration , Elastic Modulus , Equipment Design , Fracture Healing , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Motion , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Mechanical , Weight-Bearing
4.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 5(2): 183-93, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20033517

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Research on surgical robotics demands systems for evaluating scientific approaches. Such systems can be divided into dedicated and versatile systems. Dedicated systems are designed for a single surgical task or technique, whereas versatile systems are designed to be expandable and useful in multiple surgical applications. Versatile systems are often based on industrial robots, though, and because of this, are hardly suitable for close contact with humans. METHOD: To achieve a high degree of versatility the Miro robotic surgery platform (MRSP) consists of versatile components, dedicated front-ends towards surgery and configurable interfaces for the surgeon. RESULTS: This paper presents MiroSurge, a configuration of the MRSP that allows for bimanual endoscopic telesurgery with force feedback. CONCLUSIONS: While the components of the MiroSurge system are shown to fulfil the rigid design requirements for robotic telesurgery with force feedback, the system remains versatile, which is supposed to be a key issue for the further development and optimisation.


Subject(s)
Robotics , Telemedicine , Endoscopy/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Robotics/methods , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...