Clinical investigational studies for validation of a next-generation sequencing in vitro diagnostic device for cystic fibrosis testing.

PURPOSE: Clinical investigational studies were conducted to demonstrate the accuracy and reproducibility of the Illumina MiSeqDx CF System, a next-generation sequencing (NGS) in vitro diagnostic device for cystic fibrosis testing. METHODS: Two NGS assays - a Clinical Sequencing Assay (Sequencing Assay) and a 139-Variant Assay (Variant Assay) - were evaluated in both an Accuracy Study and a Reproducibility Study, with comparison to bi-directional Sanger sequencing and PCR as reference methods. For each study, positive agreement (PA), negative agreement (NA), and overall agreement (OA) were evaluated. RESULTS: In the Accuracy Study, the Sequencing Assay achieved PA of 99.7% including the polyTG/polyT region and PA of 100% excluding the region. The Variant Assay achieved PA of 100%. NA and OA were >99.99% for both Assays. In the Reproducibility Study, the Sequencing Assay achieved PA of 99.2%; NA and OA were both 99.7%. The Variant Assay achieved PA of 99.8%; NA and OA were both 99.9%. Sample pass rates were 99.7% in both studies for both assays. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic evaluation of a NGS platform for broad clinical use as an in vitro diagnostic, including accuracy validation with multiple reference methods and reproducibility validation at multiple clinical sites. These NGS-based Assays had accurate and reproducible results which were comparable to or better than other methods currently in clinical use for clinical genetic testing of cystic fibrosis.

Safety and immunogenicity of new cell-cultured smallpox vaccine compared with calf-lymph derived vaccine: a blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: US government organisations have identified the need for a new smallpox vaccine to replenish limited stocks of the approved, calf-lymph derived vaccine, the manufacture of which is no longer acceptable. We aimed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of the new cell-cultured smallpox vaccine (CCSV) to that of the calf-lymph derived vaccine (as a positive control) in 350 healthy, adult volunteers. METHODS: We did a randomised controlled study at the University of Kentucky Medical Center. We randomised 150 vaccinia-naive volunteers, aged 18-30 years, and 100 vaccinia-non-naive people, aged 32-65 years, to equivalent doses of either CCSV or test vaccine (2.5x10(5) plaque-forming units) by 15 puncture scarification in double-blind fashion. Immunogenicity was assessed by pock formation (take rate), humoral immune response by plaque-reduction neutralisation titres, and cellular immune response by vaccinia-specific, interferon-gamma T-cell quantification, cytotoxicity, and T-cell proliferation response. A further 100 vaccine-naive individuals, aged 18-30 years, received one of five doses of CCSV (undiluted, diluted 1 in 5, 1 in 10, 1 in 25, and 1 in 50) in single-blind fashion. Routine laboratory assessments, physical examinations, and recording of adverse events were done to assess vaccine safety. The primary endpoints were safety and reactogenicity (take rate) of CCSV. FINDINGS: 349 (99.7%) of 350 volunteers developed pock lesions; one vaccinia-naive individual who received a 1 in 25 dilution of CCSV did not. The rate of adverse events related to vaccine and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses did not differ between the vaccine groups in vaccinia-naive or non-naive people. CCSV was immunogenic in vaccine-naive volunteers at a dose 50 times lower than that approved for Dryvax. INTERPRETATION: CCSV seems to be a safe and immunogenic alternative to calf-lymph derived vaccine for both vaccinia-naive and non-naive people.

Safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of intravenous vaccinia immune globulin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Vaccinia immune globulin (VIG) administered via the intramuscular route has historically been used for the treatment of complications of smallpox vaccination. Intravenous formulations of VIG are required to improve tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile. METHODS: We conducted 2 separate studies to evaluate the feasibility of administration of an intravenous formulation of antivaccinia immune globulin (VIGIV). The first study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly manufactured lyophilized VIG product for intravenous administration (VIGIV-lyo). Seventy-eight healthy volunteers received an intravenous infusion of VIGIV-lyo at doses of 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg. In the second study, we evaluated the safety of a liquid product of VIGIV (VIGIV-liq) in 33 healthy volunteers receiving an intravenous infusion of 100 mg/kg VIGIV-liq. RESULTS: The geometric mean titer of VIG at the target dose (100 mg/kg) after intravenous administration is 2.5 times higher than the predicted geometric mean titer after intramuscular injection (P<.001). The pharmacokinetics of VIGIV-lyo are linear for doses from 100 mg/kg through 500 mg/kg. Administration of the 200-mg/kg and 500-mg/kg doses of VIGIV-lyo does not result in markedly higher adverse event rates. The adverse event rates observed with the liquid product are comparable to those seen with the lyophilized product. CONCLUSIONS: These 2 studies suggest that intravenous administration of VIG is well tolerated and results in a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than does VIG administered intramuscularly.