Self-reported Barriers to Adherence and Persistence to Treatment With Injectable Medications for Type 2 Diabetes.

PURPOSE: This study explored the barriers that adult Americans experience when taking injectable medications for type 2 diabetes, from the time of filling the initial prescription through the decision to discontinue the medication. METHODS: An Internet-based survey was conducted in 2 waves among adult patients (N = 2000) who had received a physician prescription for insulin, liraglutide, or exenatide once weekly (QW), regardless of whether the prescription was filled by a pharmacy. In wave 1, patients were surveyed on their medication history and experience and, if relevant, the medication discontinuation process. Those still taking their injectable medication at the time of wave 1 were contacted 6 months later (wave 2, n = 585) to assess any changes in their medication experience. FINDINGS: Among patients who delayed filling their prescription by ≥1 week, cost was a common reason for delay for refilling of liraglutide (63%) and exenatide QW (49%). The most commonly reported barrier to maintaining injectable medication was injection concerns (42%) such as aversion to needles, pain, or needle size. Lack of perceived need was the most common reason for discontinuation for basal (47%) and prandial/premixed (44%) insulin. For liraglutide, the most common reason for discontinuation was experiencing an adverse event (33%); for exenatide QW, it was injection concerns (38%). IMPLICATIONS: The diverse barriers we identified underscore the need for better patient-prescriber communication to ensure that newly prescribed injectable medications are consistent with a patient's ability or willingness to manage them, to appropriately set expectations about medications, and to address new barriers that arise during the course of treatment.

Asthma that is not well-controlled is associated with increased healthcare utilization and decreased quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Relationships of asthma control to other asthma outcomes have been incompletely documented. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQL) and subsequent healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: A 1-year online prospective longitudinal survey was conducted in 497 adults and 170 children with asthma treated in the past year. Control was measured by Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) and Childhood ACT™ (C-ACT)™ scores dichotomized into "well-controlled" (scores >19) or "not well-controlled" (scores ≤19), and HRQL was measured using the PedsQL™ 3.0 Asthma Module (children) and the SF-12 Health Survey (adults). Multivariate models were used for analysis. RESULTS: HRQL scores were significantly lower for adults (mean decrease 3.4) and children (mean decrease 12.8) whose asthma was not well-controlled compared to patients with well-controlled asthma. Adults with asthma that was not well-controlled at baseline had a threefold greater risk of an asthma-related doctor visit and a 10-fold greater risk of an emergency department (ED) visit for asthma in the subsequent 9 months (odds ratio (OR) = 3.3 and OR = 11.3, respectively). Children with asthma that was not well-controlled had a nearly fivefold increased risk for subsequent asthma-related doctors' and ED visits (OR = 4.8 and OR = 4.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both adults and children with not well-controlled asthma had significantly lower quality of life and were more likely to require an office or ED visit for asthma compared to patients with higher ACT scores. Therefore, it is important to continually assess asthma control and adjust controller therapy accordingly.