[Is the standard retention of syndesmotic positioning screws after ankle fracture fixation safe and feasible? A retrospective cohort study in 140 consecutive patients at a North American trauma centre]. / Ist das routinemäßige Belassen von Syndesmosenschrauben nach operativer Versorgung instabiler Sprunggelenksfrakturen gerechtfertigt? Erfahrung eines US-Traumazentrums an 140 konsekutiven Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Unstable ankle injuries with associated disruption of the distal-fibular syndesmosis are typically managed by adjunctive placement of temporary syndesmotic positioning screws. The widespread notion that positioning screws must be removed by default after healing of the syndesmosis remains a topic of debate which lacks scientific support. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that syndesmotic positioning screws are safely retained per protocol in asymptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of an institutional prospective database was performed during a 5-year time-window at an academic level 1 trauma centre in the United States. All ankle fractures requiring surgical fixation were included in the analysis. The primary outcome parameter consisted of the rate of elective hardware removal for syndesmotic positioning screws within 6 months after surgical fixation. RESULTS: A total of 496 consecutive patients with 496 isolated ankle fractures managed by surgical fixation were included in this study. Of these, 140 injuries were managed by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws. Within 6 months follow-up, 17.1% of all syndesmotic screws were found to be radiographically broken, and 13.6% of syndesmotic screws revealed radiographic signs of loosening. Only 2 patients (1.4%) required the elective removal of symptomatic positioning screws within 6 months of surgical fracture fixation. CONCLUSION: Despite the high rate of radiographic complications related to breaking or loosening of syndesmotic screws in almost one third of all cases, more than 98% of all patients remain asymptomatic and do not require a scheduled hardware removal. The routine removal of syndesmotic positioning screws does not appear to be justified from a patient safety perspective.

[Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?]. / Das Dogma der Minderwertigkeit von Stahlimplantaten zur Frakturversorgung. Ein Ende der Kontroverse?

BACKGROUND: Titanium plates represent the predominant implants of choice for fracture care in Central Europe, based on the apparently favourable properties related to improved "biocompatibility". The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the use of stainless steel implants for selected fractures represents a safe and efficient treatment modality, which is not associated with an increased rate of complications and surgical revisions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database during a 5-year study period (01/01/2006-12/31/2010) at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center on all fractures treated by stainless steel plates. Inclusion criteria consisted of all consecutive patients >15 years of age whose fractures were fixated with a stainless steel plate. All fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA system. Outcome parameters consisted of the rate of complications and surgical revisions, and the data were placed into context with the published complication rates for titanium plates. RESULTS: A total of 1,001 consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of fractures in the indication spectrum of this study were screened. Of these, 751 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These patients had 774 fractures which were fixated with 859 stainless steel plates. Open fractures accounted for 9.6% of all injuries (n=74). The complication rate of the 774 fractures treated with stainless steel plates was 8.01% (n=62), with a surgical revision rate of 5.16% (n=40). These data are below the reported incidence of complications and surgical revisions for titanium plates in the identical indication spectrum in the pertinent literature published. CONCLUSIONS: The fixation of selected fractures with stainless steel implants represents a safe and efficient treatment option, which does not appear to be associated with increased complication rates. These data challenge the anecdotal superiority of titanium plates and should spur a new discussion on the use of stainless steel implants, particularly under the aspect of cost savings in the DRG era.