ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Physical rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important for long-term functional recovery. Recently, sensor-based home rehabilitation (SHR) has gained prominence as a promising method that allows monitoring and guidance that is both structured and accessible, compared to traditional methods of physical rehabilitation. Despite the advent of wearable sensor systems, there is a paucity of evidence regarding SHR in the current literature. Thus, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of wearable SHR on post-TKA outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of three electronic databases from the beginning of record to March 12, 2021. Primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after rehabilitation, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society Score (KSS). Secondary outcomes were physical activity levels and functional performance including range of motion (ROM) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). RESULTS: A total of 16 studies involving 1321 subjects were included. All wearable sensors in our included studies involved a combination of accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers as functional units. These studies reported favourable outcomes for all three PROMs, although the extent of improvement in specific domains varied among studies. Moreover, physical activity in terms of daily steps and time spent on physical activity increased post-rehabilitation. Similarly, there were improvements in ROM and TUG that reflected a favourable post-operative trajectory during rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: SHR is effective for improving subjective and objective outcomes post-TKA. The role of SHR should be evaluated by a dedicated cost-benefit analysis to facilitate its wider adoption in healthcare systems.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) is an important treatment option for young patients with deficient menisci; however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal method of allograft fixation. HYPOTHESIS: The various methods of MAT fixation have measurable and significant differences in outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A single-arm meta-analysis of studies reporting graft failure, reoperations, and other clinical outcomes after MAT was performed. Studies were stratified by suture-only, bone plug, and bone bridge fixation methods. Proportionate rates of failure and reoperation for each fixation technique were pooled with a mixed-effects model, after which reconstruction of relative risks with confidence intervals was performed using the Katz logarithmic method. RESULTS: A total of 2604 patients underwent MAT. Weighted mean follow-up was 4.3 years (95% CI, 3.2-5.6 years). During this follow-up period, graft failure rates were 6.2% (95% CI, 3.2%-11.6%) for bone plug fixation, 6.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-10.3%) for suture-only fixation, and 9.3% (95% CI, 6.2%-13.9%) for bone bridge fixation. Transplanted menisci secured using bone plugs displayed a lower risk of failure compared with menisci secured via bone bridges (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .02). Risks of failure were not significantly different when comparing suture fixation to bone bridge (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; P = .12) and bone plugs (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.02; P = .64). Allografts secured using bone plugs were at a lower risk of requiring reoperations compared with those secured using sutures (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.95; P < .001), whereas allografts secured using bone bridges had a higher risk of reoperation when compared with those secured using either sutures (RR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.38; P < .001) or bone plugs (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.51; P < .001). Improvements in Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were comparable among the different groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that bone plug fixation of transplanted meniscal allografts carries a lower risk of failure than the bone bridge method and has a lower risk of requiring subsequent operations than both suture-only and bone bridge methods of fixation. This suggests that the technique used in the fixation of a transplanted meniscal allograft is an important factor in the clinical outcomes of patients receiving MATs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) results in an inflammatory response that can be modified by perioperative steroid administration. However, it remains to be determined if this response's attenuation translates to a reduction in complications. AIM: To evaluate if perioperative administration of steroids reduces complications following HR. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to evaluate the effect of perioperative steroid (compared to placebo or no intervention) use in patients undergoing HR. Clinical outcomes were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: 8 RCTs including 590 patients were included. Perioperative steroid administration was associated with significant reduction in postoperative complications [odds ratios: 0.58; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.35-0.97, P = 0.04]. There was also improvement in biochemical and inflammatory markers, including serum bilirubin on postoperative day 1 [MD: -0.27; 95%CI: (-0.47, -0.06), P = 0.01], C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 [MD: -4.89; 95%CI: (-5.83, -3.95), P < 0.001], and interleukin-6 on postoperative day 1 [MD: -54.84; 95%CI: (-63.91, -45.76), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Perioperative steroids administration in HR may reduce overall complications, postoperative bilirubin, and inflammation. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and duration and patient selection.
