Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Med J ; 35(10): 1210-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25316465

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To isolate, identify, and determine the prevalence of Candida and other yeasts of clinical importance in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study involving retrospective analysis of 6100 samples submitted to the Microbiology Laboratory, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia between 2011 and 2012, and prospective isolation and identification of 84 isolates recovered from various clinical specimens presented to the Microbiology Laboratory between 2012 and 2013 using the classic morphological schemes and the Vitek 2 automated system. RESULTS: The results of the retrospective analysis (2011-2012) indicated that of the 6100 various clinical specimens submitted to the routine microbiology analysis, 143 (2.35%) revealed the presence of Candida spp. The distribution of the 143 Candida spp according to specimens was as follows: urine 72%, sputum 10.5%, endotracheal tube 7%, blood 4.2%, catheter tip 2.1%, throat swab 2.1%, eye swab 0.7%, wound exudates 0.7%, and cerebrospinal fluid 0.7%. The results of the prospective study (2012-2013), which involved the identification of yeast recovered from 84 specimens indicated that Candida albicans 28.6% was the predominant species, followed by Candida parapsilosis 21.4%, Candida tropicalis 14.3%, and Candida lusitaniae 9.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Along with the commonly encountered Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida lusitaniae were detected with significant rates. Many other Candida species and some other pathogenic yeasts have been detected for the first time in the region. Urinary tract samples were the main source of Candida species.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Candida tropicalis/isolation & purification , Candidiasis/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/microbiology , Candidiasis/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eye Infections, Fungal/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/microbiology , Humans , Mycoses/epidemiology , Mycoses/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Wound Infection/microbiology
2.
Pak J Biol Sci ; 16(6): 275-80, 2013 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24498790

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity of antibiotics towards nosocomial infections caused by Acinetobacter species. The study took place during the period Dec. 2011- Dec. 2012 at Assir Central Hospital in collaboration with the department of microbiology, college of medicine, King Khalid University, Abha. A prospective study involving 150 patients presented with nosocomial infections due to Acinetobacter species detected by bacteriological tests; direct microscopy, culture in blood agar media, fermentation test in MacConkey media and MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) for antibiotics sensitivity using Muller Hinton media and Chemical test using API 20. A 150 nosocomial infections in this study showed gram-negative coccobacilli, non motile, glucose-negative fermentor and oxidase negative. All isolates showed 100% sensitivity to: Imipramine, Meropenem, Colistin. From the rest of tested antibiotics the higher resistant ones were; Nitrofurantoin 87% and Cefoxitin 85%. The least resistant antibiotics; Imipenem 3% and Ticarcillin 7%. While variable resistance in the rest of tested antimicrobials. A 47 patients (31.3%) have used antibiotics prior to this study. The high rate of usage occurred in elder patients. The frequency of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii complex multi-drugs resistance ABCMDR is rising including almost all commonly used antibiotics. Only few antibiotics exert 100% sensitivity towards these bacteria.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Acinetobacter/classification , Acinetobacter Infections/diagnosis , Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...