Psychosocial characteristics of adults who experience difficulties with retching.

OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to reach a greater understanding of psychosocial variables in patients who gag, and is a recognised gap within current literature. Obtaining a profile of patients who gag could provide valuable information in relation to future treatment planning and management of this type of difficulty. METHODS: All new patients aged > or =18 years, identified as having a difficulty with retching, and who attended the Anxiety Management Clinic, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Birmingham Dental Hospital, were invited to complete a brief questionnaire with questions related to general demographic data; difficulties with retching; and an oral health status measurement. This study has reported on 48 patients who attended the dental anxiety management clinic at Birmingham Dental Hospital and who presented with retching difficulties. One patient did not wish to take part in the study, leaving a final sample size of 47. The sample comprised 57% male (n=27) and 43% female (n=20) patients. RESULTS: Retching was more commonly seen in the 40-49-year age group. Onset was frequently related to an earlier dental experience and over half the sample studied had experienced previous psychological difficulties. A fear of choking or suffocation was frequently expressed, supporting a cognitive model in terms of assessment and treatment. CONCLUSION: A number of themes were identified which would be worthy of further exploration. For example, the impact of previous or existing physical health problems such as respiratory complaints, family history of retching, and prevalence of other psychological difficulties. Through participation in this study, patients were able to reach a greater awareness of this commonly encountered difficulty within dentistry.

Evaluation of dentists' perceived needs regarding treatment of the anxious patient.

BACKGROUND: With regard to the management of dental anxiety in general dental practice, it has been considered that general dental practitioners (GDPs) are well placed to treat adults with mild forms of dental anxiety. However, little is known about the specific anxiety management techniques being used by GDPs in the UK. Aim To determine the views and experiences of dental practitioners in their current use of anxiety management techniques, their undergraduate and post-graduation training in these techniques and future training needs. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to a sample of GDPs working in the Midlands region (n = 750) in the UK. Dentists were randomly selected using lists provided by the primary care trusts for each locality. RESULTS: The response rate was 73% (n = 550). Of these, 90 were not included in the final analysis due to exclusion criteria set prior to questionnaire release. This left 460 questionnaires for analysis. Eighty-five percent of respondents agreed that dentists had a responsibility to help dentally anxious patients (n = 391). Dentists were asked their reasons for not using anxiety management techniques in practice. Psychological techniques, sedation (oral, inhalation, or intravenous) and hypnosis were reported as not having been used due to the paucity of time available in practice, a shortage of confidence in using these techniques and the lack of fees available under the NHS regulations. Also, 91% reported feeling stressed when treating anxious patients. When asked about the quality of teaching they had received (undergraduate and postgraduate), 65% considered that the teaching was less than adequate in the use of psychological methods, whereas 44% indicated that they would be interested in further training in psychological methods if financial support was available. CONCLUSION: The need for further training in managing the dentally anxious patient is supported by dentists' lack of confidence and inadequate training in treating such patients, as determined from the results of a postal questionnaire to UK GDPs.

Relaxation and complementary therapies: an alternative approach to managing dental anxiety in clinical practice.

Dental anxiety is a widespread problem and has a significant impact on the provision of dental care for the general population. Anxiety leads to avoidance of dental treatment and increased stress for dental practitioners. Traditionally, dental anxiety has been managed using pharmacological techniques. This article reviews alternative treatment approaches, including psychological and complementary therapies which can be used in managing dental anxiety and facilitating dental treatment. Many of these approaches are currently being used within the dental profession. Others are gaining a wider acceptance as to their usage. Where available, the evidence of their efficacy will be reviewed.

A review of self-management interventions for panic disorders, phobias and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To review current evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions for panic disorder, phobias and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD: Papers were identified through computerized searches of databases for the years between 1995 and 2003, manual searches and personal contacts. Only randomized-controlled trials were reviewed. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified (one OCD, five panic disorder, four phobias). Effective self-management interventions included cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and exposure to the trigger stimuli for phobias and panic disorders. All involved homework. There was evidence of effectiveness in terms of improved symptoms and psychological wellbeing when compared with standard care, waiting list or relaxation. Brief interventions and computer-based interventions were effective for most participants. In terms of quality, studies were mainly based on small samples, lacked long-term follow-up, and failed to address cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of reviewed studies, there appears to be sufficient evidence to warrant greater exploration of self-management in these disorders.