ABSTRACT
Background Intraductal papillomas (IDPs) are typically classified as B3 lesions in histology as they may show intralesional heterogeneity with a potential upgrade to malignancy. On core needle biopsy (CNB), a distinction between papilloma versus papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be difficult. It is well known that otherwise benign papillomas may harbor foci of atypical ductal hyperplasia or DCIS. In this study, we aimed to calculate the radiological (mammogram and ultrasound) accuracy of IDP and to analyze the accuracy of CNB to diagnose IDP. Furthermore, we calculated the percentage of upgrade to malignancy after surgical excision. Any case that had a co-existing in-situ or invasive carcinoma during surgical excision was considered as an "upgrade" to malignancy. Finally, we analyzed the current management protocol for IDP in the institution and suggested changes, if needed. Methodology This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 112 cases diagnosed as IDP radiologically and/or by histopathology over a one-year time frame were included. A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of the radiological diagnosis was done by comparing it with CNB and/or surgical excision biopsy reports. The number of cases diagnosed with a co-existing in-situ or invasive carcinoma was calculated. This was considered as an "upgrade" from a B3 lesion in CNB to carcinoma in surgical excision. Current institutional management protocols were evaluated and compared with international benchmarks. Results Out of the 112 cases, 91 were suspected to be papilloma by imaging. The remaining 21 cases who were positive for papilloma on biopsy but were not diagnosed radiologically were also studied separately. Among the biopsied patients, eight were positive for IDP with atypia in CNB. Five out of these eight cases had an in-situ or invasive component during the surgical excision, with one invasive lobular carcinoma, three lobular carcinomas in situ, and one DCIS on surgical excision histopathology. The upgrade percentage was calculated to be 22.72%. Conclusions Due to the large upgrade potential of IDP, it is recommended to biopsy every radiologically suspected lesion and excise pathology-proved lesions. If the biopsy shows papilloma without atypia, vacuum excision is sufficient; otherwise, surgical excision with a clearance of margins is advocated. Annual mammograms/surveillance is recommended for biopsy-proven cases. IDP has a high upgrade potential, and, hence, care should be taken to biopsy suspicious lesions. An excision of biopsy-proven lesions must be done.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Compared with other countries in the Middle East, Qatar has one of the highest breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Poor quality mammography images may be associated with advanced stage breast cancer, however there is limited information about the quality of breast imaging in Qatar. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical image quality of mammography examinations performed at a tertiary care center in Doha, Qatar using a standardized assessment tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral mammograms from consecutive patients from a tertiary care cancer center in Doha, Qatar were obtained. Proportions of examinations deemed adequate for interpretation were estimated. Standardized clinical image quality assessment form was utilized to evaluate image quality components. For each image, image quality components were given grades on a 1-5 scale (5-excellent, 4-good, 3-average, 2-fair, 1-poor). Mean scores with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each component. RESULTS: Consecutive sample of 132 patients was obtained representing 528 mammographic images. Overall, 99.2% of patients underwent examinations rated as acceptable for interpretation. Mean scores for each image quality component ranged from 4.045 to 5.000 (lowest score for inframammary fold). Image quality component scores were 93.0% excellent, 5.2% good, 1.1% average, 0.6% fair, and 0.1% poor. CONCLUSION: Overall image quality at a tertiary care center in Doha, Qatar was acceptable for interpretation with minimal areas identified for improvement.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative assessment of pure Ductal Carcinoma Insitu (DCIS) is essential in the surgical planning. The role of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been debated. The impact of MRI on the management of High Grade (HG) DCIS was assessed, whether it accurately captures the true size of this entity in comparison to conventional imaging, and, if MRI use would reduce the number of re-excision surgery. METHOD: Ninety-one consecutive patients with HG DCIS, who were identified from a prospectively collected data at Kettering General Hospital between April 2011 and December 2015. All patients had preoperative MRI scan in addition to the standard breast imaging. This was compared to a control group of consecutive patients (n=52) which was obtained from a period just before 2011. Impact on surgical planning and number of surgeries for each patient was compared. The size of HG DCIS estimated by MRI was compared to the final histological size. Secondary outcomes included change of initial surgical plan and detection of occult contralateral breast cancer. RESULTS: MRI group had 91 patients with median age of 63. Seventy percent of which presented through the screening program. The overall sensitivity of MRI to detect HG DCIS was 77% (70/91) with a false negative rate FNR of 23% (21/91). Therefore, 70 patients only were included in the data analysis. The control group included 52 screening patients with comparable baseline characteristics. Re-excision (or completion mastectomy) rates were higher in the control group 26% compared to 8% in the MRI group (P-value 0.012). MRI use correctly converted the initial plan of breast conservation to mastectomy in 9 patients (13%). Five patients had additional ipsilateral malignant features (7%).Occult contra lateral disease, was diagnosed in 2 patients (3%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that MRI could be an important tool in reducing the re-excision rates in the surgical management of HG DCIS. Although still controversial, selective MRI imaging can be useful in the preoperative diagnosis and evaluation of HG DCIS. Case by case discussion at MDT is crucial. Wider adaptation of MRI when indicated in the assessment of breast lesions with proper correlation to histology postoperatively is a key in improving our MRI interpretation skills, helping us to exploit the full scope of this useful tool.
