Hungarian general practice paediatricians' antibiotic prescribing behaviour for suspected respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a major cause of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The aim of this study was to explore paediatric general practitioners' (GP Peds) antibiotic prescription practice in suspected respiratory tract infections (RTIs), using the capability-opportunity-motivation-behaviour framework. DESIGN: The design is a qualitative study based on individual, semistructured telephone or virtual interviews. SETTING: Paediatric general practice in Hungary. We applied stratified maximum variation sampling to cover the categories of age, sex and geographical location of participants. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 22 GP Peds. Nine were male and 13 were female: 2 of them were less than 40 years old, 14 were between 40 and 60 years, and 6 were above 60 years. 10 worked in low-antibiotic prescription areas, 5 in areas with medium levels of antibiotic prescription, 3 in high-antibiotic prescription areas, and 4 in and around the capital city. RESULTS: Study participants had varying antibiotic prescription preferences. Personal experience and physical examination play a central role in GP Peds' diagnostic and treatment practice. Participants emphasised the need to treat children in their entirety, taking their personal medical record, social background and sometimes parents' preferences into account, besides the acute clinical manifestation of RTI. Most respondents were confident they apply the most effective therapy even if, in some cases, this meant prescribing medicines with a higher chance of contributing to the development of AMR. Some participants felt antibiotic prescription frequency has decreased in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a more prudent attitude toward antibiotic prescribing may have become more common but also highlight relevant gaps in both physicians' and public knowledge of antibiotics and AMR. To reinforce awareness and close remaining gaps, Hungary should adopt its national AMR National Action Plan and further increase its efforts towards active professional communication and feedback for primary care physicians.

Prescribing Patterns and Variations of Antibiotic Use for Children in Ambulatory Care: A Nationwide Study.

The aim of this study was to analyse characteristics of paediatric antibiotic use in ambulatory care in Hungary. Data on antibiotics for systemic use dispensed to children (0-19 years) were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Fund. Prescribers were categorised by age and specialty. Antibiotic use was expressed as the number of prescriptions/100 children/year or month. For quality assessment, the broad per narrow (B/N) ratio was calculated as defined by the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) network. Paediatric antibiotic exposure was 108.28 antibiotic prescriptions/100 children/year and was the highest in the age group 0-4 years. Sex differences had heterogenous patterns across age groups. The majority of prescriptions were issued by primary care paediatricians (PCP). The use of broad-spectrum agents dominated, co-amoxiclav alone being responsible for almost one-third of paediatric antibiotic use. Elderly physicians tended to prescribe less broad-spectrum agents. Seasonal variation was found to be substantial: antibiotic prescribing peaked in January with 16.6 prescriptions/100 children/month, while it was the lowest in July with 4 prescriptions/100 children/month. Regional variation was prominent with an increasing west to east gradient (max: 175.6, min: 63.8 prescriptions/100 children/year). The identified characteristics of paediatric antibiotic use suggest that prescribing practice should be improved.

Содействие надлежащему использованию антибиотиков для сдерживания развития устойчивости к антибиотикам в медицине человека в Венгрии: Аналитический обзор EVIPNet для формирования политики, номер 2

Министерством человеческих ресурсов Венгрии была инициирована подготовка аналитического обзора – к публикации под эгидой Европейской сети по вопросам использования данных научных исследований при формировании политики (EVIPNet-Европа) – в целях выработки научно обоснованных вариантов реагирования на проблему ненадлежащего использования антибиотиков в стране. Эта задача выполнялась в рамках Двухгодичного соглашения о сотрудничестве (ДСС) между Министерством человеческих ресурсов и ВОЗ с участием национальных политикоформирующих учреждений высокого уровня и национальных экспертов, при поддержке технических специалистов Европейского регионального бюро ВОЗ. Национальным центром медицинских услуг Венгрии была создана рабочая группа, в которую вошли представители из областей клинической медицины, фармакологии, общественного здравоохранения и управления услугами здравоохранения. Участники рабочей группы осуществили поиск, отбор, оценку и синтез актуальных данных научных исследований по данной проблеме, определили три варианта для ее решения и рассмотрели соответствующие аспекты их реализации. К рассмотрению были предложены следующие варианты: разработка национальной программы ответственного руководства в сфере антибиотиков, предусматривающей выпуск научно обоснованных клинических руководств по диагностике и лечению распространенных инфекционных заболеваний; усиление программ высшего и последипломного образования в области медицины, стоматологии и фармацевтики и организация обучения разумному использованию антибиотиков; и повышение осведомленности о разумном использовании антибиотиков с помощью информационных кaмпаний, инфоматериалов и межличностного общения.

Az antibiotikumok felelős alkalmazásának ösztönzése az antibiotikum-rezisztencia visszaszorítására a humán gyógyászatban Magyarországon: EVIPNet Europe Szakpolitikai bizonyíték-összefoglaló, 2. szám

Az Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma (EMMI) megbízásából, az Egészségügyi Világszervezet (WHO) Bizonyítékokkal Támogatott Szakpolitikai Hálózatának (EVIPNet) égisze alatt szakpolitikai összefoglaló készült, amely bizonyítékokkal alátámasztott beavatkozási opciókat mutat be a nem megfelelő antibiotikum-alkalmazás problémájának kezelésére Magyarországon. A munkát vezető hazai szakpolitikai intézetek és szakértők végezték, az EMMI és a WHO közötti kétéves együttműködési megállapodás keretében, a WHO Európai Irodájának szakmai támogatásával. Az Állami Egészségügyi Ellátó Központ által létrehozott munkacsoportban infektológus, gyógyszerész, epidemiológus és egészségügyi menedzsmenttel foglalkozó szakemberek vettek részt. A munkacsoport azonosította, értékelte és feldolgozta a problémával, három szakpolitikai opcióval és azok implementációs megfontolásaival kapcsolatos kutatási bizonyítékokat. A három opció a következő: (1) nemzeti antibiotikum stewardship program (ASP) kialakítása, a gyakori fertőzések diagnosztizálására és kezelésére vonatkozó, bizonyítékalapú klinikai ajánlásokkal; (2) az antibiotikumok felelős felírásának hangsúlyosabb oktatása a graduális és posztgraduális orvosi, fogorvosi és gyógyszerészi tanulmányok és képzések során; és (3) a figyelem felhívása a helyes antibiotikum-alkalmazásra tájékoztató kampányok, szórólapok és interperszonális kommunikáció segítségével.

Promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics to contain antibiotic resistance in human medicine in Hungary: EVIPNet evidence brief for policy, number 2

The Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary commissioned a policy brief, to be published under the aegis of the WHO Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe, to develop evidence-informed options for the country to consider in tackling the problem of antibiotic misuse. The task was implemented in frame of the Biennial Collaborative Agreement (BCA) between the Ministry of Human Capacities and WHO, involving high level national policy institutions and national experts, supported by the technical experts of WHO Regional Office for Europe. The National Healthcare Service Center of Hungary convened a working group comprising representatives from the clinical field, pharmacology, public health and health care management. The working group identified, selected, appraised, and synthesized relevant research evidence on the problem, three options for tackling it and considerations in implementing them. The three options are: developing a national antibiotic stewardship programme, complemented by evidence-informed clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of common infections; strengthening undergraduate and postgraduate medical, dental, and pharmacy education and training on the prudent use of antibiotics; and raising awareness of prudent antibiotic use through information campaigns, leaflets and interpersonal communication.

Standardised surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection in European acute care hospitals: a pilot study, 2013.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains poorly controlled in many European countries, of which several have not yet implemented national CDI surveillance. In 2013, experts from the European CDI Surveillance Network project and from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control developed a protocol with three options of CDI surveillance for acute care hospitals: a 'minimal' option (aggregated hospital data), a 'light' option (including patient data for CDI cases) and an 'enhanced' option (including microbiological data on the first 10 CDI episodes per hospital). A total of 37 hospitals in 14 European countries tested these options for a three-month period (between 13 May and 1 November 2013). All 37 hospitals successfully completed the minimal surveillance option (for 1,152 patients). Clinical data were submitted for 94% (1,078/1,152) of the patients in the light option; information on CDI origin and outcome was complete for 94% (1,016/1,078) and 98% (294/300) of the patients in the light and enhanced options, respectively. The workload of the options was 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0 person-days per 10,000 hospital discharges, respectively. Enhanced surveillance was tested and was successful in 32 of the hospitals, showing that C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 was predominant (30% (79/267)). This study showed that standardised multicountry surveillance, with the option of integrating clinical and molecular data, is a feasible strategy for monitoring CDI in Europe.

Gap analysis of infection control practices in low- and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infection rates are higher in low- and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries, resulting in relatively larger incidence of patient mortality and disability and additional healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: To use the Infection Control Assessment Tool to assess gaps in infection control (IC) practices in the participating countries. METHODS: Six international sites located in Argentina, Greece, Hungary, India, Nepal, and South Africa provided information on the health facility and the surgical modules relating to IC programs, surgical antibiotic use and surgical equipment procedures, surgical area practices, sterilization and disinfection of equipment and intravenous fluid, and hand hygiene. Modules were scored for each country. RESULTS: The 6 international sites completed 5 modules. Of 121 completed sections, scores of less than 50% of the recommended IC practices were received in 23 (19%) and scores from 50% to 75% were received in 43 (36%). IC programs had various limitations in many sites and surveillance of healthcare-associated infections was not consistently performed. Lack of administration of perioperative antibiotics, inadequate sterilization and disinfection of equipment, and paucity of hand hygiene were found even in a high-income country. There was also a lack of clearly written defined policies and procedures across many facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that adherence to recommended IC practices is suboptimal. Opportunities for improvement of IC practices exist in several areas, including hospital-wide IC programs and surveillance, antibiotic stewardship, written and posted guidelines and policies across a range of topics, surgical instrument sterilization procedures, and improved hand hygiene.

Evaluation of the national surveillance system for point-prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in hospitals and in long-term care facilities for elderly in Norway, 2002-2008.

BACKGROUND: Since 2002, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has invited all hospitals and long-term care facilities for elderly (LTCFs) to participate in two annual point-prevalence surveys covering the most frequent types of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). In a comprehensive evaluation we assessed how well the system operates to meet its objectives. METHODS: Surveillance protocols and the national database were reviewed. Data managers at national level, infection control practitioners and ward personnel in hospitals as well as contact persons in LTCFs involved in prevalence data collection were surveyed. RESULTS: The evaluation showed that the system was structurally simple, flexible and accepted by the key partners. On average 87% of hospitals and 32% of LTCFs participated in 2004-2008; high level of data completeness was achieved. The data collected described trends in the prevalence of reportable HAIs in Norway and informed policy makers. Local results were used in hospitals to implement targeted infection control measures and to argue for more resources to a greater extent than in LTCFs. Both the use of simplified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions and validity of data seemed problematic as compliance with the standard methodology were reportedly low. CONCLUSIONS: The surveillance system provides important information on selected HAIs in Norway. The system is overall functional and well-established in hospitals, however, requires active promotion in LTCFs. Validity of data needs to be controlled in the participating institutions before reporting to the national level.

Investigation of Swedish cases reveals an outbreak of cryptosporidiosis at a Norwegian hotel with possible links to in-house water systems.

BACKGROUND: In March 2007, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health was notified of Swedish individuals diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis after staying at a Norwegian hotel. In Norway, cryptosporidiosis is not reportable, and human infections are rarely diagnosed. METHODS: A questionnaire on illness and exposure history was e-mailed to seven organised groups who had visited the hotel in March. Cases were defined as persons with diarrhoea for more than two days or laboratory-confirmed cryptosporidiosis during or within two weeks of the hotel visit. The risk factor analysis was restricted to two groups with the highest attack rates (AR) and same hotel stay period. Local food safety authorities conducted environmental investigations. RESULTS: In total, 25 diarrhoeal cases (10 laboratory-confirmed) were identified among 89 respondents. Although environmental samples were negative, epidemiological data suggest an association with in-house water consumption. In one group, the AR was higher amongst consumers of water from hotel dispenser (relative risk [RR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-9.8), tap water (RR = 2.3; CI: 0.9-5.8), and lower amongst commercial bottled water drinkers (RR = 0.6; CI: 0.4-1.0). Consumption of ice cubes was a risk-factor (RR = 7.1; CI: 1.1-45.7) in the two groups combined. CONCLUSION: This outbreak would probably have remained undetected without the alert from Swedish health authorities, illustrating the difficulties in outbreak detection due to low health care seeking behaviour for diarrhoea and limited parasite diagnostics in Norway. Awareness of cryptosporidiosis should be raised amongst Norwegian medical personnel to improve case and outbreak detection, and possible risks related to in-house water systems should be assessed.