Autologous stem cell transplantation followed by consolidation chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure after autotransplantation (auto-PBSCT) for Hodgkin's disease (HD). The administration of non-crossresistant therapies during the post-transplant period may delay or prevent relapse. We prospectively studied the role of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) after auto-PBSCT in 37 patients with relapsed or refractory HD. Patients received high-dose gemcitabine-BCNU-melphalan and auto-PBSCT followed by involved-field radiation and up to four cycles of the DCEP-G regimen, which consisted of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin, gemcitabine given at 3 and 9 months post transplant alternating with a second regimen (DPP) of dexamethasone, cisplatin, paclitaxel at 6 and 12 months post transplant. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2.5 years were 59% (95% CI=42-76%) and 86% (95% CI=71-99%), respectively. In all, 17 patients received 54 courses of CC and 15 were surviving event free (2.5 years, EFS=87%). There were no treatment-related deaths during or after the CC phase. Post-transplant CC is feasible and well tolerated. The impact of this approach on EFS should be evaluated in a larger, randomized study.

A survey of patients' rights representatives in Israeli Hospitals: 1999-2000.

Israel's legislature enacted a Patients' Rights Act in 1996. The Act directed hospitals to designate a representative responsible for supervising protection of patients' rights under the new law, investigating complaints, and educating medical staff regarding the provisions of the Act. This survey was conducted in order to evaluate implementation of that section of the law pertaining to hospital representatives of patients' rights. The authors conducted interviews with responsible individuals at government hospitals in Israel, inquiring about their duties, training, complaint procedures, and practices. The authors found that while the representatives shared some basic knowledge of their legal duty, methods of implementation differed widely. It is recommended that a comprehensive program of training be devised for hospital patients' rights representatives, in order to realize the potential of the Act.

Disclosure of Huntington's disease to family members: the dilemma of known but unknowing parties.

Predictive genetic testing presents unique issues in the legal and ethical debate concerning disclosure of information within the physician-patient relationship. A duty to disclose information to family members has been found when the disclosure is likely to result in the ability to mitigate the damaging effects of the disease. When evaluating the situation where a individual is at risk of Huntington's disease, the analysis must be different, as shown in this paper, and necessitates an ethical and legal examination of the consequences of receipt of the information on family members, those known but unknowing parties who are at risk of inheriting a genetic disease. This paper analyzes the potential legal duty of a physician to disclose or withhold genetic information from the family members of patients. Existing statutes governing genetic information do not directly address the interests of family members. Courts that have ruled on the duty to disclose medical or genetic information have analyzed these issues using traditional concepts of tort law. Yet the situation presented by Huntington's disease is unique and demands a different framework for analysis, given the late onset and lack of curative or ameliorative treatment. This paper also analyzes the ethical standards to be invoked when considering violating the privacy of a patient or a family member. The principles of autonomy and self-determination of family members are considered, versus the risk of harm and the privacy interest in not knowing potentially devastating information.