ABSTRACT
Viral infections with cytomegalovirus (CMV) or human adenovirus (HAdV) after stem cell transplantation are still associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Transfer of T-cell immunity from a healthy individual to a stem cell transplant recipient, known as adoptive T-cell transfer, has been shown to be effective to prevent viral complications. Treatment efficacy will depend on the availability of functional T-cell lines with a strong T(helper)1 response. Ex vivo isolation of antigen-specific T cells could be performed on the basis of the cytokine capture technique or antigen-induced expression of activation markers. In this study, we compare the specificity, expansion/differentiation potential, and T(helper)1 response against CMV and HAdV after different isolation strategies. Antigen-specific T cells from healthy donors were isolated by antigen-induced expression of IFN-γ and/or CD137 after stimulation with the viral antigens hexon (HAdV) or pp65 (CMV). Isolation of antigen-specific T cells based on the expression of activation markers is feasible and less time consuming, but in contrast to isolation based on IFN-γ secretion, it leads to a reduction of T(helper)1 cells. Both isolated CD137(+) and isolated IFN-γ(+) T cells mainly consist of CD4(+) T(CentralMemory) and T(EffectorMemory) cells with high expansion potential and effective cytokine production. CD154(+) is mainly expressed on CD4(+)T cells and shows coexpression with IFN-γ on activated T cells, which cannot be found for CD137(+) cells. In conclusion, T-cell lines could be easily generated on the basis of IFN-γ(+) and/or expression of the activation marker CD137 but both approaches result in different T-cell populations, which may lead to divergent T-cell responses in vivo.
