Streptococcus pneumoniae binds to host GAPDH on dying lung epithelial cells worsening secondary infection following influenza.

Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) alone and during co-infection with influenza A virus (IAV) can result in severe pneumonia with mortality. Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) is an established virulence factor required for Spn evasion of lactoferricin and C-reactive protein-activated complement-mediated killing. Herein, we show that PspA functions as an adhesin to dying host cells. We demonstrate that PspA binds to host-derived glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) bound to outward-flipped phosphatidylserine residues on dying host cells. PspA-mediated adhesion was to apoptotic, pyroptotic, and necroptotic cells, but not healthy lung cells. Using isogenic mutants of Spn, we show that PspA-GAPDH-mediated binding to lung cells increases pneumococcal localization in the lower airway, and this is enhanced as a result of pneumolysin exposure or co-infection with IAV. PspA-mediated binding to GAPDH requires amino acids 230-281 in its α-helical domain with intratracheal inoculation of this PspA fragment alongside the bacteria reducing disease severity in an IAV/Spn pneumonia model.

The Modified Surface Killing Assay Distinguishes between Protective and Nonprotective Antibodies to PspA.

Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) elicits antibody protective against lethal challenge by Streptococcus pneumoniae and is a candidate noncapsular antigen for inclusion in vaccines. Evaluation of immunity to PspA in human trials would be greatly facilitated by an in vitro functional assay able to distinguish protective from nonprotective antibodies to PspA. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to PspA can mediate killing by human granulocytes in the modified surface killing assay (MSKA). To determine if the MSKA can distinguish between protective and nonprotective MAbs, we examined seven MAbs to PspA. All bound recombinant PspA, as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting; four gave strong passive protection against fatal challenge, two were nonprotective, and the seventh one only delayed death. The four that were able to provide strong passive protection were also most able to enhance killing in the MSKA, the two that were not protective in mice were not effective in the MSKA, and the MAb that was only weakly protective in mice was weakly effective in the MSKA (P < 0.001). One of the four most protective MAbs tested reacted to the proline-rich domain of PspA. Two of the other most protective MAbs and the weakly protective MAb reacted with a fragment from PspA's α-helical domain (αHD), containing amino acids (aa) 148 to 247 from the N terminus of PspA. The fourth highly protective MAb recognized none of the overlapping 81- or 100-aa fragments of PspA. The two nonprotective MAbs recognized a more N-terminal αHD fragment (aa 48 to 147).IMPORTANCE The most important finding of this study is that the MSKA can be used as an in vitro functional assay. Such an assay will be critical for the development of PspA-containing vaccines. The other important findings relate to the locations and nature of the protection-eliciting epitopes of PspA. There are limited prior data on the locations of protection-eliciting PspA epitopes, but those data along with the data presented here make it clear that there is not a single epitope or domain of PspA that can elicit protective antibody and there exists at least one region of the αHD which seldom elicits protective antibody. Moreover, these data, in concert with prior data, strongly make the case that protective epitopes in the αHD are highly conformational (≥100-amino-acid fragments of the αHD are required), whereas at least some protection-eliciting epitopes in the proline-rich domain are encoded by ≤15-amino-acid sequences.

The modified surface killing assay distinguishes between protective and nonprotective antibodies to PspA

Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) elicits antibody protective against lethal challenge by Streptococcus pneumoniae and is a candidate noncapsular antigen for inclusion in vaccines. Evaluation of immunity to PspA in human trials would be greatly facilitated by an in vitro functional assay able to distinguish protective from nonprotective antibodies to PspA. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to PspA can mediate killing by human granulocytes in the modified surface killing assay (MSKA). To determine if the MSKA can distinguish between protective and nonprotective MAbs, we examined seven MAbs to PspA. All bound recombinant PspA, as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting; four gave strong passive protection against fatal challenge, two were nonprotective, and the seventh one only delayed death. The four that were able to provide strong passive protection were also most able to enhance killing in the MSKA, the two that were not protective in mice were not effective in the MSKA, and the MAb that was only weakly protective in mice was weakly effective in the MSKA (P < 0.001). One of the four most protective MAbs tested reacted to the proline-rich domain of PspA. Two of the other most protective MAbs and the weakly protective MAb reacted with a fragment from PspA’s a-helical domain (aHD), containing amino acids (aa) 148 to 247 from the N terminus of PspA. The fourth highly protective MAb recognized none of the overlapping 81- or 100-aa fragments of PspA. The two nonprotective MAbs recognized a more N-terminal aHD fragment (aa 48 to 147). IMPORTANCE The most important finding of this study is that the MSKA can be used as an in vitro functional assay. Such an assay will be critical for the development of PspA-containing vaccines. The other important findings relate to the locations and nature of the protection-eliciting epitopes of PspA. There are limited prior data on the locations of protection-eliciting PspA epitopes, but those data along with the data presented here make it clear that there is not a single epitope or domain of PspA that can elicit protective antibody and there exists at least one region of the aHD which seldom elicits protective antibody. Moreover, these data, in concert with prior data, strongly make the case that protective epitopes in the aHD are highly conformational (=100-amino-acid fragments of the aHD are required), whereas at least some protection-eliciting epitopes in the proline-rich domain are encoded by =15-amino-acid sequences.

The modified surface killing assay distinguishes between protective and nonprotective antibodies to PspA

ABSTRACT Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) elicits antibody protective against lethal challenge by Streptococcus pneumoniae and is a candidate noncapsular antigen for inclusion in vaccines. Evaluation of immunity to PspA in human trials would be greatly facilitated by an in vitro functional assay able to distinguish protective from nonprotective antibodies to PspA. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to PspA can mediate killing by human granulocytes in the modified surface killing assay (MSKA). To determine if the MSKA can distinguish between protective and nonprotective MAbs, we examined seven MAbs to PspA. All bound recombinant PspA, as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting; four gave strong passive protection against fatal challenge, two were nonprotective, and the seventh one only delayed death. The four that were able to provide strong passive protection were also most able to enhance killing in the MSKA, the two that were not protective in mice were not effective in the MSKA, and the MAb that was only weakly protective in mice was weakly effective in the MSKA (P < 0.001). One of the four most protective MAbs tested reacted to the proline-rich domain of PspA. Two of the other most protective MAbs and the weakly protective MAb reacted with a fragment from PspA’s a-helical domain (aHD), containing amino acids (aa) 148 to 247 from the N terminus of PspA. The fourth highly protective MAb recognized none of the overlapping 81- or 100-aa fragments of PspA. The two nonprotective MAbs recognized a more N-terminal aHD fragment (aa 48 to 147). IMPORTANCE The most important finding of this study is that the MSKA can be used as an in vitro functional assay. Such an assay will be critical for the development of PspA-containing vaccines. The other important findings relate to the locations and nature of the protection-eliciting epitopes of PspA. There are limited prior data on the locations of protection-eliciting PspA epitopes, but those data along with the data presented here make it clear that there is not a single epitope or domain of PspA that can elicit protective antibody and there exists at least one region of the aHD which seldom elicits protective antibody. Moreover, these data, in concert with prior data, strongly make the case that protective epitopes in the aHD are highly conformational (=100-amino-acid fragments of the aHD are required), whereas at least some protection-eliciting epitopes in the proline-rich domain are encoded by =15-amino-acid sequences.

Bridging the gap: a collaborative to reduce peripherally inserted central catheter infections in the home care environment.

BACKGROUND: Ochsner Health System agreed to participate in a nationwide collaboration to reduce central line infections in our intensive care units. Our outpatient peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) infection rate was unacceptably high, so as an adjunct to the nationwide study we attempted to reduce PICC infections in the home care environment. Typically, home health nurses or outpatient infusion centers care for PICCs per protocol. However, no standardized protocol exists, and each facility may have a different way to care for PICCs, leading to varied and inconsistent maintenance. METHODS: Key members from our hospital, home health agencies, and an infusion company formulated a plan to reduce outpatient PICC infections. We hypothesized that the only way to reduce infections was to standardize line care and maintenance and to empower the patient to be an advocate for his or her care. The best avenue for achieving standardized care across multiple infusion companies and multiple home health agencies was to develop an order set for PICC care and dressing changes. We also developed a checklist for the nurse and the patient to complete together during dressing changes. The checklist and order set were linked to the hospital's home health discharge orders so that they would print automatically when the provider discharged the patient to home health care. RESULTS: Baseline data were collected from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011. During that time, the infusion company identified 20 PICC infections. In 20,773 line days, the infection rate was 0.963 per 1,000 line days. The new order sets and checklists were instituted on July 1, 2011. From July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012, 11 PICC infections were identified with 21,021 line days. The calculated infection rate was 0.52 per 1,000 line days. PICC infections so far have been reduced by 46%. CONCLUSION: By bridging the gap between inpatient and outpatient care, we reduced PICC infections by 46% in our home infusion patients. We accomplished this result through a collaborative partnership among hospital staff, an infusion company, and home health agencies and a standardized process for line care and maintenance using a PICC home care order set and a patient/nursing PICC care checklist.

Modified opsonization, phagocytosis, and killing assays to measure potentially protective antibodies against pneumococcal surface protein A.

The standard opsonophagocytosis killing assay (OPKA) for antibodies to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide was modified to permit an evaluation of the protection-mediating antibodies to pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA). We found that by increasing the incubation time with the complement and phagocytes from 45 min to 75 min, the protective activity was readily detected. In another modification, we used a capsule type 2 target strain that expressed PspA but not pneumococcal surface protein C (PspC). With these modifications separately or in combination, rabbit antisera to the recombinant α-helical or proline-rich domains of PspA mediated >50% killing of the target strain. The ability of normal human sera to mediate the killing of pneumococci in this modified OPKA correlated with their levels of antibodies to PspA and their ability to protect mice against fatal infection with a type 3 strain. Passive protection of mice against pneumococci and killing in the modified OPKA were lost when normal human sera were adsorbed with recombinant PspA (rPspA) on Sepharose, thus supporting the potential utility of the modified OPKA to detect protective antibodies to PspA. In the standard OPKA, monoclonal antibodies to PspA were strongly protective in the presence of subprotective amounts of anti-capsule. Thus, the currently established high-throughput OPKA for antibodies to capsule could be modified in one of two ways to permit an evaluation of the opsonic efficacy of antibodies to PspA.

Mucosal immunization with polyamine transport protein D (PotD) protects mice against nasopharyngeal colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an encapsulated pathogen that can cause invasive disease following colonization of the nasopharynx. Targeting colonization of mucosal surfaces may, therefore, be the best approach for vaccination to prevent pneumococcal invasive disease. Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that immunization with recombinant polyamine transport protein D (PotD) protects mice against systemic pneumococcal infections. In this study we investigated the efficacy of mucosal immunization with rPotD to protect against pneumococcal carriage and invasion in a murine model. Mice were intranasally immunized with either rPotD and cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) or CTB alone. Significantly less pneumococci were recovered from the nasopharynx of immunized mice compared to the control animals following intranasal challenge with either EF3030 (serotype 19F) (P < 0.05) or an invasive serotype 4 isolate (TIGR4) (P < 0.05). PotD immunized mice also had lesser bacteria in their sinus tissues (P < 0.05), brains (P < 0.05), lungs and olfactory bulbs following intranasal challenge with TIGR4. ELISA analysis demonstrated the presence of IgG antibodies to PotD in the serum and IgA antibodies in the saliva. These results indicate that mucosal immunization with PotD generates both mucosal and systemic immune responses and prevents establishment of nasopharyngeal carriage by multiple pneumococcal serotypes. Thus, PotD is a potentially important antigen for development of a pneumococcal protein vaccine.