Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Acta Orthop ; 93: 894-900, 2022 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36448721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block is a novel anesthetic technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our objective was to compare the effect of IPACK and adductor canal block (ACB) and periarticular injection (PAI), relative to ACB and PAI only, from baseline to postoperative day 3, in patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Adults over the age of 50 who were scheduled for unilateral primary TKA were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to ACB and PAI block (control group), or ACB, PAI, and IPACK block (IPACK group). The primary outcome was mean pain at rest during 24-48 hours post-operation using a numerical rating scale (0-10). We also investigated opioid use and ambulation pain. RESULTS: 89 patients were evaluated, 45 from the control group and 44 from the IPACK group. Despite slightly higher mean pain score at rest in the control group, no statistically significant difference was found during 0-24 hours (0.13; 95% CI -0.19 to 0.46), 24-48 hours (0.42; CI -0.06 to 0.89), and 48-72 hours (0.35; CI 0.00 to 0.69) postoperatively as well as in maximum pain scores at rest. Neither pain during ambulation nor the number of opioids used differed between the trial groups at any given time point. CONCLUSION: The addition of the IPACK block to ACB and PAI did not reduce postoperative pain intensity or opioid usage. Therefore, IPACK block may not offer any benefit for pain management in patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA who are already receiving ACB and PAI.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Adult , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Knee Joint , Lower Extremity , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
2.
J Ultrasound ; 25(3): 529-533, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34993922

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Percutaneous hamstring lengthening is increasingly popular due to its simplicity, fast recovery rate, and low morbidity. Neurovascular anatomy changes due to knee flexion contracture and the precise proximity of peroneal nerve and Biceps femoris tendon are not well established. This study examined (1) the coronal distance between the peroneal nerve and lateral hamstring tendon ("PLD"), and (2) the distance between the popliteal vessels and medial hamstring tendons ("VMD") to determine the safe distance for percutaneous hamstring lengthening. METHODS: This prospective study recruited cerebral palsy patients aged under 15 who needed hamstring lengthening. Ultrasonography was performed after the patients were anesthetized. PLDs and VMDs at popliteal angles (PAs) of 40°, 60°, and 80° knee flexions were collected. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (32 knees) were enrolled. The mean minimum PLDs at PAs of 40°, 60°, and 80° were 3.5, 4.1, and 3.1 mm, respectively. The peroneal nerve physically touched the lateral hamstring tendon in 5/32 knees (15.6%). The mean minimum VMDs at PAs of 40°, 60°, and 80° were 19, 18.3, and 16.4 mm, respectively. One spastic diplegic patient had a minimum VMD < 3 mm on both sides. Changing the PAs demonstrated no statistical significance for both PLD and VMD (P value = 0.105 and 0.779, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous medial hamstring lengthening should be done with caution. We recommend open biceps femoris surgery, with preoperative ultrasonography (to check the PLD) or peroneal nerve palpation to reduce the risk of peroneal nerve transection.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Aged , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Tenotomy
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 5, 2022 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspiration is a major complication in anesthesia, and various studies have shown that gastric sonography can reliably provide valuable information relative to both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of gastric content. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasound assessment of gastric content compared between two novice anesthesiologist gastric sonographers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study of two anesthesiologists learning to perform qualitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content on healthy volunteers was conducted at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (reg. no. NCT04760106). RESULTS: Of the 50 enrolled participants, three were excluded due to study protocol violation. Each anesthesiologist performed a qualitative assessment on 47 participants for an overall total of 94 scans. There were 15 males and 32 females (age 42 ± 11.7 years, weight 61.2 ± 13.1 kg, height 160.7 ± 7.3 cm, and BMI 23.6 ± 4.3 kg/m2). The overall success rate for all gastric content categories was approximately 96%. From antral cross-sectional area measurement, as the ingested volume increased, there was a tendency toward increased deviation from the actual ingested volume. Interrater agreement between anesthesiologists was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A larger fluid volume was found to be associated with a lower level of agreement between the two anesthesiologists. The ICCs were 0.706 (95% CI: -0.125 to 0.931), 0.669 (95% CI: -0.254 to 0.920), 0.362 (95% CI: -0.498 to 0.807) for the 100 ml, 200 ml, and 300 ml fluid volumes, respectively. The mean duration to perform an ultrasound examination for each gastric content category and for the entire examination did not differ significantly between anesthesiologists (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content is highly accurate and can be easily learned. In contrast, quantification of gastric volume by novice gastric sonographers is more complex and requires more training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04760106 Date registered on Feb 11, 2021. Prospectively registered.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Contents/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Clinical Competence , Cohort Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Qualitative Research , Reproducibility of Results , Thailand
4.
J Orthop Sci ; 27(4): 844-849, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tendon surgery in the pediatric foot and ankle could cause severe postoperative pain, which may lead to psychologic distress and chronic pain. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block (PNB) and local surgical site infiltration (LSI) in pediatric foot and ankle tendon surgery. METHODS: Forty pediatric patients, who underwent foot and ankle tendon surgery were enrolled. Patients age 1-6 years old were allocated to group 1 and 7-15 years old were group 2. The popliteal-sciatic nerve block with 0.5% Bupivacaine (0.25 ml/kg) for group 1A and 2A. Group 1B and 2B received 0.5% Bupivacaine (0.25 ml/kg) local injection before wound closure. Pain score was recorded using CHEOPS in 1-6 years (Group1A, 1B), NRS in age 7-15 years (Group 2A, 2B). The post-operative morphine consumption and complications were recorded. RESULTS: For 7-15 years, pain score in group 2B was more than group 2A at postoperative 2 and 6 h [Mean difference (95% CI); -3.4 (-6.4 to -0.3), and -2 (-4.4 to 0.5), respectively], and reached MCID of 2. The number of morphine consumption was significantly higher in group 2 B at 0-6 and 6-12 h post-operatively [Mean difference (95% CI); -0.8 (-1.4 to -0.2), and -0.6 (-1.1 to -0.1), respectively, with p-value < 0.05]. For 1-6 years, there was no significant difference in pain score and number of postoperative morphine consumption. CONCLUSIONS: PNB and LSI provided effective pain management in patients aged 1-6 years old with no statistically significant difference. PNB showed significant superior pain control in patients aged 7-15 years old.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Pain Management , Adolescent , Anesthetics, Local , Ankle/surgery , Bupivacaine , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Morphine , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Sciatic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional
5.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 282, 2021 11 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34773995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study compared the effects of adductor canal blocks with those of a low concentration of popliteal-sciatic nerve block (SNB) and dexamethasone as an adjunctive technique for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed in 50 patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs undergoing unilateral TKAs. All patients received spinal anesthesia, adductor canal blocks, and periarticular infiltration. The 25 patients in the intervention group received SNB (0.125% bupivacaine [20 ml] and dexamethasone [5 mg]). RESULTS: The SNB group significantly had lower median resting pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h: the control group, 1 (0-4.5), 3 (0-5), and 3 (2-5); the intervention group, 0 (0-0), 0 (0-3), and 1 (0-3); p-values, 0.012, 0.021, and 0.010, respectively. Movement-evoked pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h were also lower: control group, 3 (0-5.5), 5 (2.5-6.5), and 7 (4-9); intervention group, 0 (0-1.5), 2 (0-4), and 3 (2-5); p-values, 0.019, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively. There were no differences in motor function. Moreover, the mean morphine consumption 24 h was also reduced in the SNB group: control group, 3.80 ± 2.48 mg; intervention group, 1.96 ± 2 mg; p-value, 0.005. CONCLUSION: For patients susceptible to the adverse effects of NSAIDs, a low concentration of SNB and dexamethasone is an effective adjunctive technique for early postoperative pain control (especially on movement) following TKAs, without an increase in motor weakness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03486548 , Registered 3 April 2018.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Spinal , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Sciatic Nerve , Time Factors
6.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 99(5): 578-83, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27501614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequate analgesia and early rehabilitation is necessary for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (A CLR) surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia and quadriceps strength after femoral nerve block (FNB) with intra-articular infiltration (IA) using 0.25% bupivacaine for ACLR with patella tendon graft. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty patients were randomized to receive FNB under ultrasound guidance with 20 mL of bupivacaine or IA with 15 mL of bupivacaine into the knee joint and 5 mL infiltrated along the incision sites including portal sites at the end of surgery. All patients received intravenous ketorolac at wound closure. Data regarding demographic, time to first pain, time to first morphine requirement, morphine usage, pain scores and quadriceps strength were recorded. RESULTS: Significant difference in quadriceps strength was shown. Ninety percent of patients in Group IA and fifty-five percent of patients in Group FNB had good ability to extend knee at 24 hours after surgery (p = 0.013). No differences were found in demographic data, time to first pain, time to first morphine requirement, post operative pain scores and morphine consumption, CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrated that IA has an effect on quadriceps strength less than FNB while provide comparable postoperative analgesia after patellar tendon graft ACLR.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femoral Nerve/physiology , Muscle Strength , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Morphine/therapeutic use , Patellar Ligament/surgery , Quadriceps Muscle
7.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 97(7): 717-23, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25265770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve block (FNB) with varying concentrations of bupivacaine is often used for postoperative analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether FNB using 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine provided better analgesia with less effect on quadriceps strengths after ACL reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred patients were randomized to receive FNB with 20 mL of 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine. Data regarding demographic, effectiveness of FNB, time to first pain, time to first analgesic, pain scores, morphine use, and recovery of sensory and motor function were recorded. RESULTS: Median time to first morphine requirement was 12 hours in 0.5% bupivacaine group and 10 hours in 0.25% bupivacaine group (p = 0.048). Pain score at 18 hours was lower in 0.5% bupivacaine group compared with 0.25% bupivacaine group (p = 0.001). When specify to the patellar tendon graft subgroup, the patients requiring morphine were 70% in 0.5% bupivacaine group and 90% in 0.25% bupivacaine group (p = 0.03). No differences were found in demographic data, effectiveness of FNB, time to first pain, morphine consumption, and recovery of sensorimotor function. CONCLUSION: FNB with 0.5% bupivacaine provided longer time to first analgesic and lower narcotic requirements after patellar tendon graft ACL reconstruction when compared to 0.25% bupivacaine. Both concentrations showed similar effect on quadriceps strengths.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Nerve Block/methods , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Femoral Nerve , Humans , Male , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Patellar Ligament/surgery , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 97(5): 530-5, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative oral carbohydrate (CHO) drink may improve patients' comfort. However, whether it prevents or reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is questionable. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of oral rehydration with 10% CHO drink before anesthesia on incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after spinal morphine injection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred patients scheduled for unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 50 each). Group I patients received 400 ml 10% CHO drink the preoperative night and 2-hour before anesthesia, whereas Group II patients served as control. Spinal anesthesia for all patients contained 0.5% bupivacaine 2.0 to 3.5 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. Pain therapy was standardized with femoral nerve block, local infiltration, intravenous parecoxib, and oral paracetamol. Incidence and severity of PONV within 24 hours were recorded In addition, preoperative intensity of thirst and hunger, dry lips and throat, and anxiety was also recorded RESULTS: Incidence and severity of PONV (81.2% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.536) as well as preoperative thirst, hunger dry lips, and throat were not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative oral rehydration with carbohydrate drinks had no positive effect on PONV nor patients' comfort.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Beverages , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Fluid Therapy/methods , Morphine/administration & dosage , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Local Reg Anesth ; 3: 21-6, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22915864

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Fracture of femur is a painful bone injury, worsened by any movement. This prospective study was performed to compare the analgesic effects of femoral nerve block (FNB) with intravenous (IV) fentanyl prior to positioning patients with fractured femur for spinal block. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four ASA I-III patients aged 18-80 years undergoing surgery for femur fracture were randomized into two groups. Fifteen minutes before spinal block, the FNB group received nerve stimulator-assisted FNB with a mixture of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 10 mL normal saline 0.9%, and the fentanyl group received two doses of IV fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg with a five-minute interval between doses. Numeric rating pain scores were compared. During positioning, fentanyl in 0.5 µg/kg increments was given every five minutes until pain scores were ≤4. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups according to pain scores, need for additional fentanyl, and satisfaction with positioning before spinal block. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate a benefit of FNB over IV fentanyl for patient positioning before spinal block. However, FNB can provide postoperative pain relief, whereas side effects of fentanyl must be considered, and analgesic dosing should be titrated based on pain scores. A multimodal approach (FNB + IV fentanyl) may be a possible option.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...