Risk Factors for Readmission after Ileostomy Creation: an NSQIP Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy creation is associated with excess readmissions following colorectal surgery. This study identifies risk factors for readmission in patients undergoing ileostomy creation and identifies areas of clinical intervention to reduce readmission. METHODS: We used the NSQIP dataset including colectomy specific data to include 39,380 patients who underwent ileostomy creation between 2012 and 2017. We conducted univariate and multivariable analysis to identify predictors of surgery-related 30-day readmissions. Our multivariate model included surgery type (total abdominal colectomy, partial colectomy, enterectomy, or pelvic dissection), gender, age, race, ethnicity, preoperative renal failure, dialysis, transfusion, ascites, ventilator dependence, diabetes, ASA class, functional status, emergency case, SSI, wound disruption, postoperative renal insufficiency, postoperative sepsis, discharge destination, and wound class. RESULTS: A total of 5718 (14.52%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. After multivariate analysis, factors associated with readmission were gender, age, Hispanic ethnicity, dialysis, transfusion, ventilator dependence, diabetes, emergency case, SSI, postoperative renal insufficiency, postoperative sepsis, and discharge to a skilled facility. Patients who had enterectomy and partial colectomies were less likely to be readmitted than patients who had a pelvic procedure. Patients with postoperative renal insufficiency or renal failure were much more likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with readmission included the type of procedure and postoperative complications such as SSI, sepsis, and renal failure. Efforts to reduce readmission should focus on patients undergoing concomitant pelvic procedures as well as avoidance and management of common complications in this group of patients.

Novel Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Hemorrhoidectomy Task Trainers.

OBJECTIVE: Develop and describe a set of low-cost hemorrhoidectomy task trainer prototypes in the setting of inadequate junior resident surgical skill preparation for anorectal cases. DESIGN: This is a study comparing expert and novice performance and opinions. Three task trainers were developed to simulate dissecting, knot-tying, and suturing in a confined space, like the anus. Participants were asked to dissect the peel off of an orange, tie seven 2-handed knots on a weight, and close a defect in a piece of felt with a running stitch. An 8-oz mason jar was used to simulate the confined space. Participants were asked to fill out a 5-point Likert-based evaluation regarding the skills. The primary outcome was time to complete each task in seconds. Secondary outcome measures were number of errors associated with each task, subjective achievability of tasks, and utility of tasks for improving surgical skills. SETTING: General surgery residency program at a safety-net academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty subjects participated in this study. There were 20 experts (7 attending surgeons, 13 PGY-1-PGY-5 surgical residents) and 20 novices (11 third- and 9 fourth-year medical students). RESULTS: Experts knot-tied (59s vs 140s, p < 0.001) and sutured (219s vs 295s, p < 0.001) faster than novices. Experts were able to tie 7 knots in fewer attempts than novices (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in speed of orange dissection between groups. There were no significant differences in the number or frequency of other errors. All participants felt the tasks were achievable (4.90/5) and would be useful in improving skills (4.93/5). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a set of low-cost, low-fidelity prototypical hemorrhoidectomy task trainers can discriminate between experts and novices. Simulation models such as these can offer useful practice opportunities for junior general surgery trainees.

Resident involvement in minimally-invasive vs. open procedures.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic compared to open procedures. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2007-2012 was queried for open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR), inguinal hernia repair (IHR), splenectomy, colectomy, or cholecystectomy (CCY). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 88,337 VHR, 20,586 IHR, 59,254 colectomies, 3301 splenectomies, and 95,900 CCY were identified. Resident involvement was predictive for major complication during open VHR (AOR, 1.29; p < 0.001), but not during any other procedure. Resident participation significantly prolonged operative time for open, as well as laparoscopic VHR, IHR, colectomy, splenectomy, and CCY (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that resident participation has a similar impact on surgical outcomes during laparoscopic and open surgery, and is generally safe.

Epidemiologic Analysis of Diverticulitis.

The aim of this article is to evaluate geographic variation in the incidence of diverticulitis and examine behavioral and environmental factors associated with high rates of diverticulitis across the United States. We used state hospital discharge data from 20 states to determine rates of inpatient diverticulitis from January 2002 to December 2004 at patient's county of residence. Next, we merged the county level data with behavioral and environmental survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Finally, we determined the association between behavioral and environmental factors (i.e., teeth removal, dental cleaning, air quality, smoking, alcohol, vaccine, vitamins, and mental health) and high rates of diverticulitis. From January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004, a total of 345,216 hospitalizations for acute diverticulitis were recorded for 1,055 counties. We identified rates of diverticulitis that ranged from 35.4 to 332.7 per 100,000 population. On univariate analysis, high diverticulitis burden was associated with regions of the country with substantial tooth loss from dental disease (45.8% for high diverticulitis counties vs. 37.5% for low diverticulitis counties; p = 0.0001). There is considerable variability in diverticulitis cases by county of residence across the nation. Potential triggers of diverticulitis may be associated with tooth removal and sun exposure.

Do Appendicitis and Diverticulitis Share a Common Pathological Link?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between appendicitis and diverticulitis. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: This study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: We examined the rate of appendectomy among 4 cohorts of patients: 1) patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy, 2) inpatients with medically treated diverticulitis, 3) patients who underwent left-sided colectomy for diverticulitis, and 4) patients who underwent colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the appendectomy rate. RESULTS: We studied a total of 928 patients in this study. There were no differences in the patient characteristics of smoking status, nonsteroidal use, or history of irritable bowel syndrome across the 4 study groups. Patients with surgically treated diverticulitis had significantly more episodes of diverticulitis (2.8 ± 1.9) than the medically treated group (1.4 ± 0.8) (p < 0.0001). The rate of appendectomy was 8.2% for the diverticulosis control group, 13.5% in the cancer group, 23.5% in the medically treated diverticulitis group, and 24.5% in the surgically treated diverticulitis group (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for demographics and other clinical risk factors, patients with diverticulitis had 2.8 times higher odds of previous appendectomy (p < 0.001) than the control groups. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design is associated with selection, documentation, and recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal significantly higher appendectomy rates in patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis, medically or surgically managed, in comparison with patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis. Therefore, we propose that appendicitis and diverticulitis share similar risk factors and potentially a common pathological link.

What Factors Predict Hospital Readmission after Colorectal Surgery?

Readmissions pose a significant hardship for patients and constitute a major quality and financial concern for hospitals. We sought to define risk factors associated with hospital readmission after colorectal surgery at a tertiary care hospital. We evaluated readmission among all patients who underwent a colorectal surgical procedure between July 16, 2007 and June 30, 2011. In a cohort of 4879 operative encounters, 492 (10%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Procedures with highest readmissions included stoma creation (22%), ileoanal pouch surgery (22%), and total proctocolectomy (30%). In multivariate analysis, the following variables were associated with risk of readmission: postoperative complication, use of anxiolytics, high comorbidity score, patient setting, alcohol use, and stoma creation. Surgeon of record was not associated with readmission. In conclusion, several patient, procedural, and postoperative factors were associated with an increased risk of readmission. Considerably high rates of readmission were noted after stoma creation, ileoanal pouch procedures, and proctocolectomy. Surgeon of record was not associated with risk of readmission, indicating little value to this metric as a physician-specific indicator of quality.

Do patient safety indicators explain increased weekend mortality?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the differential role of patient safety indicator (PSI) events on mortality after weekend as compared with weekday admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PSI events within a cohort of patients with nonelective admissions. First, we identified all patients with a PSI based on day of admission (weekend versus weekday). Then, we evaluated the outcome of mortality after each PSI event. Finally, we entered age, sex, race, median household income, payer information, and Charlson comorbidity scores in regression models to develop risk ratios of weekend to weekday PSI events and mortality. RESULTS: There were 28,236,749 patients evaluated with 428,685 (1.5%) experiencing one or more PSI events. The rate of PSI was the same for patients admitted on weekends as compared to weekdays (1.5%). However, the risk of mortality was 7% higher if a PSI event occurred to a patient admitted on a weekend as compared with a weekday. In addition, compared to patients admitted on weekdays, patients admitted on weekends had a 36% higher risk of postoperative wound dehiscence, 19% greater risk of death in a low-mortality diagnostic-related group, 19% increased risk of postoperative hip fracture, and 8% elevated risk of surgical inpatient death. CONCLUSIONS: Risk adjusted data reveal that PSI events are substantially higher among patients admitted on weekends. The considerable differences in death after PSI events in patients admitted on weekends as compared with weekdays indicate that responses to adverse events may be less effective on weekends.

Adenomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Diagnosis and Management.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndromes make up fewer than 1% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer each year. Patients with familial polyposis syndromes including FAP, attenuated FAP, and MYH-associated polyposis (MAP), are an important group often cared for by colorectal surgeons. Registry and screening programs have been shown to improve survival in patients with adenomatous polyposis, as it allows patients to undergo surgical intervention prior to the development of colorectal cancer. There are several surgical options for the treatment of colorectal polyps in patients with adenomatous polyposis, so it is important to choose the appropriate procedure for each patient after discussing the risk of cancer in the rectal remnant, as well as bowel and sexual function in a predominantly young patient group. Regardless of procedure choice, long-term follow-up is important with yearly endoscopic evaluation of the pouch or remnant rectum, as well as appropriate screening for extracolonic malignancy. Adenomatous polyposis patients require an intense care regimen, but can have a normal lifespan with good quality when cared for appropriately.

Management of Malignant Adenomas.

Most polyps that originate in the colon and rectum are benign. A small subset of polyps will contain a malignancy. Although most malignant adenomas are managed with colonic resection a number can be approached with endoscopic, minimally invasive, and observational techniques. This article reviews the histologic characteristics and adverse risk factors that would portend a poor oncologic outcome and therefore suggest formal colonic resection. Modern endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal resection are discussed.

What are the results of colonic volvulus surgery?

BACKGROUND: Operative results of volvulus are largely unknown because of infrequent diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We examined the results of operative intervention for colonic volvulus. DESIGN: We merged trackable data from the California Inpatient Database with Supplemental Files for Revisit Analyses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. SETTINGS: Trackable data from California discharge records. PATIENTS: We identified all of the patients with colonic volvulus who underwent 1 of 4 surgical procedures, including manipulation/fixation of the colon, right colectomy, left colectomy, or total colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: During the 36-month study period, we identified recurrence risk, recurrence requiring reoperation, time to reoperation, stoma formation, disposition on discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Fisher exact, χ(2), and ANOVA tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 2141 patients with colonic volvulus who were undergoing intraoperative manipulation/fixation of the colon (n = 209 (12%)), right (n = 728 (41%)), left (n = 781 (44%)), or total colectomy (n = 56 (3%)). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation were younger, more likely to be women, and more likely to have private insurance. Patients who underwent total colectomy had the highest risk of mortality (21%), highest risk of stoma creation (64%), and longest length of stay (18 days); were more likely to be readmitted (9%); and were the most likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (48%). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation had the lowest mortality, risk of stoma formation, length of stay, and likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facility but the highest risk of subsequent procedures for volvulus (26%) over a follow-up ranging from 0 to 687 days. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneous patient factors, and inability to identify the time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with volvulus underwent a resectional procedure. A subset without resection had favorable initial outcomes but remained at high risk for subsequent procedures. There may be a potential role for evaluating intraoperative manipulation/fixation in a small subset of patients with colonic volvulus.

Can the national surgical quality improvement program provide surgeon-specific outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve the quality of surgical care and reduce morbidity and mortality have resulted in outcomes reporting at the service and institutional level. Surgeon-specific outcomes are not readily available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-specific outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 100% capture institutional quality data. DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study evaluating institutional and surgeon-specific outcomes following colorectal surgery procedures at 1 institution over 5 years. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent an operation by a colorectal surgeon at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality, reoperation, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, superficial surgical site infection, and organ space infection were the primary outcomes measured. ANALYSIS: We compared annual and 5-year institutional and surgeon-specific adverse event rates between the data sets. In addition, we categorized individual surgeons as low-outlier, average, or high-outlier in relation to aggregate averages and determined the concordance between the data sets in identifying outliers. Concordance was designated if the 2 databases classified outlier status similarly for the same adverse event category. RESULTS: In the 100% capture institutional data, 6459 operative encounters were identified in comparison with 1786 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program encounters (28% sampled). Annual aggregate adverse event rates were similar between the institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. For annual surgeon-specific comparisons, concordance in identifying outliers between the 2 data sets was 51.4%, and gross discordance between outlier status was in 8.2%. Five-year surgeon-specific comparisons demonstrated 59% concordance in identifying outlier status with 8.2% gross discordance for the group. LIMITATIONS: The inclusion of data from only 1 academic referral center is a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Each surgeon was identified as a "high outlier" in at least 1 adverse event category. Comparisons at the annual and 5-year points demonstrated poor concordance between our 100% capture institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

All things not being equal: readmission associated with procedure type.

BACKGROUND: There is an accelerated effort to reduce hospital readmissions despite minimal data detailing risk factors associated with this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data from January 1, 2011-December 31, 2011, evaluating all patients undergoing one of 34 targeted operative procedures across all surgical specialties. Multivariate regression models of risk for readmission were developed including targeted procedure codes, demographic variables, preoperative variables, intraoperative variables, and postoperative adverse events. Our main outcome measure was hospital readmission. RESULTS: A total of 217, 389 patients met study inclusion criteria. Minimal associations existed between patient factors and risk of readmission. Adverse events including unplanned operating room return (odds ratio [OR] 8.5; confidence interval [CI] 8.0-9.0), pulmonary embolism (OR 8.2; CI 7.1-9.6), deep incisional infection (OR 7.5; CI 6.7-8.5), and organ space infection (OR 5.8; CI 5.3-6.3) were associated with increased risk of readmission. Our data suggest the type of procedure performed is significantly associated with risk of readmission. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed procedures, involving the pancreas, rectum, bladder, and lower extremity vascular bypass, were associated with the highest risk of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications demonstrated stronger association with readmission than patient factors. Focused analysis of higher risk procedures may provide insight into strategies for risk reduction.

Outcomes after operations for anal fistula: results of a prospective, multicenter, regional study.

BACKGROUND: There are various surgical techniques used treat anal fistulas. The adoption and success rates of newer techniques have not been clearly established. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the healing rate after operations for anal fistulas in New England colorectal surgery practices. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at colorectal surgery practices in New England. PATIENTS: A prospective, multicenter registry was created by the New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Surgeons were invited to collect data prospectively regarding patients operated on for anal fistulas between January 1, 2011, and August 1, 2013. Fistula classification, surgical intervention, continence scores, and healing were determined by the treating surgeon. INTERVENTION: Operation for anal fistula was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the proportion of patients with healed fistulas at 3 months. RESULTS: Sixteen surgeons submitted data regarding 240 operations for fistula with curative intent. Mean patient age was 45 ± 14 years. A total of 158 patients (66%) were men, and 110 (46%) had undergone an anorectal operation. Twenty-nine (12%) had Crohn's disease. The healing rates of fistulotomy, advancement flap, and fistula plugs at 3 months were 94% (95% CI, 89-97), 60% (95% CI, 33-77), and 20% (95% CI, 5-50). The healing rate of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure at 3 months was 79% (95% CI, 65-88). Hospital site was the only variable associated with healing (p < 0.05). Hospitals that performed more ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures had higher healing rates at 3 months (p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by selection bias and reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of techniques are used to treat anal fistulas in our region. Fistulotomy continues to have excellent results. There has been enthusiastic early adoption of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract technique. Early healing rates after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appear to be excellent.

Which operative repair is associated with a higher likelihood of reoperation after rectal prolapse repair?

The rate of reoperation after transabdominal as compared with transperineal repair for rectal prolapse is unknown. We evaluated all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse performed through transabdominal or transperineal repair from the trackable California Inpatient data files and Revisit Analyses during the time period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007. We specifically evaluated rates of reoperation and stoma formation during the 36-month study period. A total of 3400 patient discharges with rectal prolapse from California during the 36-month study period was identified. Of this cohort, 1772 patients had one or more prolapse repairs. Procedures were more likely to be performed through a transabdominal (1035 [58%]) as compared with a transperineal approach (737 [42%]). There was no difference in reoperation for transabdominal (11%) as compared with transperineal procedures (11%; P = 0.9). However, a significantly larger proportion of patients underwent stoma formation after transabdominal (8%) as compared with transperineal repair (5%; P < 0.02). Time to reoperation was not significantly different for patients treated with transabdominal (295 ± 254 days) as compared with transperineal repair (271 ± 246 days; P = 0.6). In conclusion, the risk of reoperation is substantial for both transabdominal and transperineal procedures for rectal prolapse.

Is patient diagnosis a risk factor for organ space infection after colorectal resections?

BACKGROUND: Validated risk adjustment programs do not use patient diagnosis as a potential covariate in the evaluation of organ space infections. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that patient diagnosis is an important risk factor for organ space infection after colorectal resections. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study abstracting data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 2005 through December 2009. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent 1 of 3 types of colorectal resections (ileocolostomy, partial colectomy, and coloproctostomy) were identified by the use of Current Procedural Terminology codes. We excluded patients with concomitant formation of diverting or end stoma. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was organ space infection. ANALYSIS: Validated risk adjustment models were used with the addition of diagnostic codes. RESULTS: We identified 52,056 patients who underwent a colorectal resection of whom 1774 patients developed an organ space infection (3.4%) and 894 (50.2%) returned to the operating room for further surgery. For ileocolostomy, operations for endometriosis (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.7-36.6) and intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0) were associated with increased risk of organ space infection. For partial colectomy, operations for intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3), IBD (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.8), and bowel obstruction (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection. For coloproctostomy, operations for malignant neoplasm (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3) and diverticular bleeding (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.0) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for National Surgical Quality Improvement Program covariates, intra-abdominal fistula, endometriosis, and diverticular bleeding were the diagnoses associated with the highest risk of organ space infection following colorectal resections.

Changing paradigms in acute care surgery: a shift to the hindgut.

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.

What is the effect of stoma construction on surgical site infection after colorectal surgery?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections after an index colorectal surgical procedure. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We evaluated all patients who underwent colorectal surgery procedures from January 2005 to December 2009 with or without creation of a stoma and sought to identify the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections. RESULTS: A total of 79,775 patients underwent colorectal procedures (laparoscopic 30.7%, open 69.3%), while 8,113 patients developed a surgical site infection (10.2%). The univariate analysis revealed that surgical site infections were much more common in patients with a stoma compared to those with no stoma (11.8% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, stoma construction during the index colorectal procedure (OR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4), ASA class ≥2, smoking, and abnormal body mass index were associated with surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: The construction of a stoma with colorectal procedures is associated with a higher risk of surgical site infection. Although the stoma effect on surgical site infection is attenuated with laparoscopic techniques, the association remained statistically significant.

Modern management of hemorrhoidal disease.

Complaints secondary to hemorrhoidal disease have been treated by health care providers for centuries. Most symptoms referable to hemorrhoidal disease can be managed nonoperatively. When symptoms do not respond to medical therapy, procedural intervention is recommended. Surgical hemorrhoidectomy is usually reserved for patients who are refractory to or unable to tolerate office procedures. This article reviews the pathophysiology of hemorrhoidal disease and the most commonly used techniques for the nonoperative and operative palliation of hemorrhoidal complaints.