ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Accurate delineation of the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) in focal drug-resistant epilepsy often requires stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) recordings. We aimed at: (1) proposing a truly objective and quantitative comparison between electro-encephalography/magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) source-imaging (EMSI), EEG/functional MRI (EEG/fMRI) responses for similar spikes with primary-irritative zone (PIZ) and SOZ defined by SEEG and (2) evaluating the value of EMSI and EEG/fMRI to predict postsurgical outcome. METHODS: We identified patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent EEG/MEG, EEG/fMRI, and subsequent SEEG at the Epilepsy Service from the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital. We quantified multimodal concordance within the SEEG channel-space, as spatial overlap with PIZ/SOZ and distances to the Spike-onset, Spike-maximum-amplitude and Seizure-core intracerebral channels, by applying a new methodology consisting of converting EMSI results into SEEG electrical potentials (EMSIe-SEEG) and projecting the most significant fMRI response on the SEEG channels (fMRIp-SEEG). Spatial overlaps with PIZ/SOZ (AUCPIZ, AUCSOZ) were assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Here, AUC represents the probability that a randomly picked active contact exhibited higher amplitude when located inside the spatial reference than outside. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included. Mean spatial overlaps with the primary-irritative zone and seizure-onset zone were 0.71 and 0.65 for EMSIe-SEEG, and 0.57 and 0.62 for fMRIp-SEEG. Good EMSIe-SEEG spatial overlap with the primary-irritative zone was associated with smaller distance from the maximum EMSIe-SEEG contact to the Spike-maximum-amplitude channel (median distance 14 mm). Conversely, good fMRIp-SEEG spatial overlap with the seizure-onset zone was associated with smaller distances from the maximum fMRIp-SEEG contact to the Spike-onset and Seizure-core channels (median distances 10 mm and 5mm respectively). Surgical outcomes were correctly predicted by EEG/MEG in 12/15 (80%) patients and EEG/fMRI in 6/11(54%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using a unique quantitative approach estimating EMSI and fMRI results in the reference SEEG channel-space, EEG/MEG and EEG/fMRI accurately localized the seizure-onset zone as well as the primary-irritative zone. Precisely, EEG/MEG more accurately localized the primary-irritative zone, whereas EEG/fMRI was more sensitive to the seizure-onset zone. Both neuro-imaging techniques provide complementary localization that can help guiding SEEG implantation and selecting good candidates for surgery.
